User talk:Guest934

Your recent edits

Hi there. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. If you can't type the tilde character, you should click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your name and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you! --SineBot (talk) 20:47, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

Your contributions history shows that you have been aggressively cross-posting, in order to influence User talk:Sam Blacketer. Although the Arbitration Committee has ruled that "The occasional light use of cross-posting to talk pages is part of Wikipedia's common practice."¹, such cross-posting should adhere to specific guidelines. In the past, aggressively worded cross-posting has contributed towards an Arbitration Committee ruling of disruptive behavior that has resulted in blocks being issued. It is best not to game the system, and instead respect Wikipedia's principle of consensus-building, by ceasing to further crosspost, and instead allowing the process to reflect the opinions of editors that were already actively involved in the matter at hand. Gscshoyru (talk) 20:54, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

what you talking about i appealing to arbitrators

There's a difference between 'appealing' and 'spamming your little heart out'. You ask one person for help. Not fifteen. HalfShadow (talk) 21:02, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why you call my hearts small my heart big i do not want anyone's fingers to be cut off wikipedian is threatening to chop off a wikipeida reviewers fingers need help now

You're going about this the wrong way and your edits are getting reverted. Durova^Charge! 21:08, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

why you people trying to hide that wikipedain threatened wikipedia reviewer with violence ask arbitrators if you do not believe me wikipedia review say one of them received threats why you hold your critics hostage this is not right the world need to know about the wrong happening here Guest934 (talk) 21:11, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from spamming so many talk pages about this matter. As Durova said above, its "the wrong way" to go about it. Thank you.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 21:34, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Chopping off peoples fingers wrong. World need to know. Letting world know not wrong. Guest934 (talk) 21:49, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guest934 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Why you guys intent on covering up that wikipedia hold its critics hostage. Charles Matthews arbitrator say that arbcom know about this. Why you guys stop me talking to Charles Matthews arbitrator. I demand to talk to Charles Matthews arbitrator. Guest934 (talk) 22:12, 26 February 2008 (UTC)

Decline reason:

Seriously, it's not by annoying the maximum number of people that you will get any sympathy... — -- lucasbfr ^talk 22:14, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Please stop this

Your posting of this has been pointless and disruptive.

"Wikipedia" is not threatening Armed Blowfish. Some individual person who signed up for a Gmail account did so. I and others at Wikipedia have offered to assist Armed Blowfish with a criminal case to identify and prosecute the threatener - AB has so far wished to remain anonymous and not prosecute. If AB changes their mind they have our total support on this matter.

Splattering accusations all over Wikipedia that this is our fault is just wrong. Please stop. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:18, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If not your fault why not let world know on administrator noticeboard. World need to know. More eyes is better. I want to talk to Charles Matthews arbitrator. I was talking to Charles Matthews arbitrator but they will not let me. Guest934 (talk) 22:25, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If the world needed to know, AB would have posted it on Wikipedia Review a couple of months ago and asked us to post it here widely.

What you're doing here is not in any way helpful. Look at the discussion thread on Wikipedia Review, please. Spamming discussion all over Wikipedia is completely pointless. Georgewilliamherbert (talk) 22:28, 26 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]