User talk:Guest2610

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Kawasaki KLR650. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include (but are not limited to) links to personal web sites, links to web sites with which you are affiliated, and links that attract visitors to a web site or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Since Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, external links do not alter search engine rankings. If you feel the link should be added to the article, please discuss it on the article's talk page rather than re-adding it. Thank you. V-train (talk) 08:17, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2008

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Kawasaki KLR650. Note that the three-revert rule prohibits making more than three reversions in a content dispute within a 24 hour period. Additionally, users who perform a large number of reversions in content disputes may be blocked for edit warring, even if they do not technically violate the three-revert rule. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing. Please do not repeatedly revert edits, but use the talk page to work towards wording and content that gains a consensus among editors. If necessary, pursue dispute resolution. V-train (talk) 08:20, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Please read WP:EL for the reasons why your additions are being treated as WP:SPAM, and reverted. Snowfire51 (talk) 09:02, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked for a period of 48 hours from editing in accordance with Wikipedia's blocking policy for continuing to add spam links. If you wish to make useful contributions, you are welcome to come back after the block expires. Persistent spammers will have their websites blacklisted from Wikipedia. If you believe this block is unjustified, you may contest the block by adding the text {{unblock|your reason here}} below.

I notice that your only edits are to add these links. Please be aware that if you come off this block and start re-adding them or making similar non-constructive edits, your account is liable to be blocked indefinitely. Stifle (talk) 10:46, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Guest2610 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

No "spam" links were added. What kind of people do you have running this place, abuse seems to be rampant. All links added meet the policies of Wikipedia and none of them were commercial or spam. Someone is removing all other community websites except for their own. The links that were added are for the benefit of the readers, I stand to gain nothing by sharing them. People deserve the knowledge.

Decline reason:

spamming links to an site is spam. _→AzaToth 14:19, 7 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.