User talk:Gudzwabofer
Welcome!
Hello, Gudzwabofer, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
- The five pillars of Wikipedia
- Tutorial
- How to edit a page and How to develop articles
- How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
- Manual of Style
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! -- Jytdog (talk) 02:55, 20 March 2015 (UTC)
A kitten for you! Awww.......
[edit]
Isn't this kitty cute?
Young Naturopath 01 (talk) 13:55, 22 March 2015 (UTC)
Invitation
[edit]
Hello, Gudzwabofer,
The Editing team is asking for your help with VisualEditor. I am contacting you because you may have tried to use VisualEditor before. Please tell them what they need to change to make VisualEditor work well for you. The team has a list of top-priority problems, but they also want to hear about small problems. These problems may make editing less fun, take too much of your time, or be as annoying as a paper cut. The Editing team wants to hear about and try to fix these small things, too.
You can share your thoughts by clicking this link. You may respond to this quick, simple, anonymous survey in your own language. If you take the survey, then you agree your responses may be used in accordance with these terms. This survey is powered by Qualtrics and their use of your information is governed by their privacy policy.
More information (including a translateable list of the questions) is posted on wiki at mw:VisualEditor/Survey 2015. If you have questions, or prefer to respond on-wiki, then please leave a message on the survey's talk page.
Thank you, Whatamidoing (WMF) (talk) 19:12, 26 March 2015 (UTC)
WikiProject Percussion
[edit]Are you sure you want to claim whistle as percussion? I've seen some odd ways to play woodwind, but banging on or with whistles isn't one of them! :-) Martin of Sheffield (talk) 14:47, 4 September 2015 (UTC)
- Please go back and re-assign the importance of most percussion articles to Low or Mid. They cannot all be High. Binksternet (talk) 06:12, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- So far all I have assigned are the percussion instrument articles, which are an important focus of the percussion project, which is all the rating system is about. There are plenty of unassigned percussion articles, mostly related to individual percussionists, percussion ensembles, and instrument manufacturers which you're more than welcome to sort through should you wish to join the project.Gudzwabofer (talk) 06:21, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Do you intend to move articles such as Tan-tan from High importance to Low importance? Or are you inviting me to clean up after you? Binksternet (talk) 06:29, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- A Tan-tan is a common percussion instrument in Brazil, therefore, it can't be classed as of low importance to the percussion category. The only reason I have given these ratings is as an aid to working on better organising the percussion category, as explained at Wikipedia_talk:WikiProject_Percussion/Assessment. As you're not part of this project, I'm not sure what concern of yours this is. By "cleaning up after me" all you'd be doing is making my job harder. Honestly this feels like rather pedantic harassment.Gudzwabofer (talk) 06:40, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- Also your description of this as re-assigning is inaccurate. Most of these pages were previously unassigned, as I personally reinstated the importance scale for the percussion project yesterday.Gudzwabofer (talk) 06:48, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- The point is that you assigned "High" to every percussion article, without regard to the real-world importance of the topic. By "re-assign" I mean that your new assignment should be redone because it is wrong in most cases. By the way, anyone who expresses an interest in WikiProject activities is free to comment or participate, without formally signing up as a member.
- If you assign a High importance to every single topic in a WikiProject then you are already making the job harder. Binksternet (talk) 06:58, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
- If you listened to what I said you would realise your point is moot. I have not assigned High importance to every percussion article, there are still 390 unassigned articles which would almost all be classed as low or mid level importance as none of them are instrument articles. The overal ratings may change in time. But for what I'm working on at present (and given the low level of participation in this project it is mostly me), this simplified approach is working best. I haven't even begun to look at categories because there are still percussion articles which don't even have a basic tag of belonging to the project. At present my main focus is to make sure they're all tagged with basic ratings, all incorporated into List of percussion instruments, and all given infoboxes and H-S classifications. I haven't even begun to look at how complete or incomplete category listings are, and I've only just begun to look at which articles may need merging. I've only made one submission in this regard so far.
- Now that I have today just finished incorporating every presently tagged instrument into List of percussion instruments I'm not going to spend effort in trying to stop you touching the High, Mid, Low, and Untagged categories, but please don't remove any pages from the Top level importance as even the specialist technical stubs are there for a reason as I need to check if they're linked or incorporated in the larger top-level articles. Please also don't add tags to any percussion articles without also adding them to List of percussion instruments as this is the primary means of keeping track of which percussion instrument articles are presently in existence. (The categories are a mess and don't include many instruments). Also please don't simply revert what I've done on pages because in some cases I've added tags where no tags previously existed.Gudzwabofer (talk) 07:23, 9 September 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:37, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]
Hello, Gudzwabofer. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
New Challenge for Oceania and Australia
[edit]Hi, Wikipedia:WikiProject Oceania/The 10,000 Challenge and Wikipedia:WikiProject Australia/The 5000 Challenge are up and running based on Wikipedia:The 10,000 Challenge which has currently produced over 2300 article improvements and creations. The Australia challenge would feed into the wider region one and potentially New Zealand could have a smaller challenge too. The main goal is content improvement, tackling stale old stubs and important content and improving sourcing/making more consistent but new articles are also welcome if sourced. I understand that this is a big goal for regular editors, especially being summertime where you are, but if you'd like to see large scale quality improvements happening for Oceania and Australia like The Africa Destubathon, which has produced over 1700 articles in 5 weeks, sign up on the page. The idea will be an ongoing national editathon/challenge for the region but fuelled by a series of contests to really get articles on every province and subject mass improved. The Africa contest scaled worldwide would naturally provide great benefits to Oceania countries, particularly Australia and attract new editors. I would like some support from existing editors here to get the Challenges off to a start with some articles to make doing a Destubathon worthwhile and potentially bring about hundreds of improvements in a few weeks through a contest! Cheers.♦ --MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:12, 24 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gudzwabofer. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, Gudzwabofer. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
The article Jason Barnes (drummer) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
No claim to notability
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JDDJS (talk to me • see what I've done) 05:49, 15 September 2019 (UTC)