User talk:Gualt Mariana

March 2017

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that using multiple accounts is allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not, and that all edits made while evading a block or ban may be reverted or deleted. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below. NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:48, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Please see WP:SCRUTINY and stick to one account. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 02:50, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gualt Mariana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Not sockpuppeting. My IP is dynamic, and my browser does not save cookies or passwords. I only create accounts to hide my IP. This is the nature of the internet, who is to stop me from just posting as a random IP? This is ridiculous. And the supposed thing I was banned for has expired long ago. Perhaps you need to show good faith, and not ban people first without asking questions. You are making assumptions which is a biased offence, did I personally disturb you? I really do not understand why I was labeled as sock puppet and banned so quickly. Gualt Mariana (talk) 03:06, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

As NeilN stated below, only this account has been blocked. You're welcome to continue editing as usual by signing into your GR.no account. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

correction, my browser does save cookies, but it automatically deletes them after a certain period. Gualt Mariana (talk) 03:08, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Again, use your GR.no account please. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:07, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not have the password for it anymore. And I cannot remember such things for long, nor am I required to. And I am certainly not evading any ban. Gualt Mariana (talk) 03:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I did not say you were avoiding a ban. I pointed you towards WP:SCRUTINY: "Avoiding scrutiny: Using alternative accounts that are not fully and openly disclosed to split your editing history means that other editors may not be able to detect patterns in your contributions. While this is permitted in certain circumstances (see legitimate uses), it is a violation of this policy to create alternative accounts to confuse or deceive editors who may have a legitimate interest in reviewing your contributions." --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:12, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Did you confirm an email address with the account? If so, you can recover the password to the account by clicking here. ~Oshwah~^{(talk) (contribs)} 03:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I do not provide email addresses. Gualt Mariana (talk) 03:21, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I will unblock this account and block the other one if you post a clear message on your user page that links the two accounts. Fair? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think the point is that I'm not trying to confuse anyone. And given the nature of my internet connection and browser configuration, I would not be feasible to always announce who I am. Wikipedia does technically allow anonymous editing, though the IP address is exposed. Again the only purpose I create an account is to hide the IP, but I may forgo doing this in the future if it will avoid any possibility of being automatically banned without any questions asked again. Show good faith. Gualt Mariana (talk) 03:29, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You can hide your IP by editing with a registered account. You cannot create new registered accounts at whim. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Furthermore, I am not trying to make any edits that Gr.no had made. I have purposely abandoned any subjects associated with him. Gualt Mariana (talk) 03:42, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really? Anyways, will you post a clear message on your user page that links the two accounts? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 03:44, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I don't see your point in linking the comment I made on Jimbo's talk page. And I have no problem agreeing with you, but I believe this is unnecessary; all of it, even this conversation. Also, I'm afraid I have made a few assumptions myself. I do not agree with the subject I posted in, I just glaced at the subject and assumed poor adminship was something common without even reading the subject. Gualt Mariana (talk) 04:14, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Poor adminship is NOT the norm here, right? I mean lets pretend for a moment that I wasn't just automatically banned through poor assumption and quick judgement. Gualt Mariana (talk) 04:19, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Really must be honest with you, I just want to see an admin admit to being wrong about something. To see if it's even possible. I assure you I am not being stubborn, I really don't have any problem associating myself with GR.no. But I am really curious to see an admin actually admit to being wrong, forgive my curiosity. Gualt Mariana (talk) 04:32, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I understand why you linked the comment I made on Jimbo's talk page. I assume you are being a smart ass, correct? Yes, what I meant was that I have not edited any subjects GR.no has edited, and have been purposely avoiding them. Don't be foolish now. Gualt Mariana (talk) 04:41, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Given you stated that you abandoned any subjects associated with your prior account yet your third edit with this account directly referred to basically the only subject GR.no edited, I'm hardly being a "smart ass". Also, have you created more accounts in the past? If so, what were they? --NeilN ^{talk to me} 12:09, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I think you need to unban this account before even asking any further questions. The nerve of you. And you are bringing up trivial matters for no apparent reason, I would definitely call this being a smart ass. This account has not made any edits to any subjects GR.no has edited, what is so difficult to understand about that? There is absolutely no connection to GR.no other than mentioning some of his edits in a totally unrelated talk page. You must be joking. Seriously. Take a break. 19:10, 17 March 2017 (UTC)

Given you are unwilling to disclose any alternative accounts you may have used, I see no reason to unblock this account. --NeilN ^{talk to me} 19:18, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

That's fine, you are truly delusional to believe anyone cares though. Pathetic and delusional, and you are also wrong here. This does amuse me by the way. I am not associated with any other accounts other than GR.no and maybe perhaps one other (which I cannot remember) and some Random IP addresses, due to the nature of my computer which periodically deletes information, I cannot remember all of my accounts. This should be obvious by now, and there is no reason to keep me banned other than perhaps some stupid game you are playing. It's totally unnecessary. Gualt Mariana (talk) 20:13, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gualt Mariana (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Reasons discussed on my talk page.

Decline reason:

After seeing the personal attacks and insults above, no. And if I see any more such attacks and insults, you will be losing the ability to edit this talk page too. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 09:07, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Hello, I'm Jim1138. I noticed that you made a comment on the page User talk:Gualt Mariana with this edit that didn't seem very civil, so I removed it. Wikipedia needs people like you and me to collaborate, so it’s one of our core principles to interact with one another in a polite and respectful manner. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Jim1138 (talk) 22:18, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Because of this, I have revoked your ability to edit this talk page. If you want to make any further appeal, see WP:UTRS. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 22:29, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]