User talk:Gtmnetwork

Re: Article Modification

Hi! I looked at your edit, and don't see anything wrong with the content, although the formatting is wrong. However, that does not mean it should have been removed. In my eyes there was nothing wrong with what you had written.

You don't need to add the bold or italic emphasis, as you have done. To cite a website as a source you should use the template {{cite web}}, and create a references section with the template {{reflist}}

I hope that helps, Howie ☎ 23:14, 23 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Request for Assistance

Copied from editor assistance requests, in respose to your query

It appears to have been a one time thing, and you were able to change it back without any problems. Please remember the note on the editing page: "If you don't want your writing to be edited mercilessly or redistributed for profit by others, do not submit it." If a difference of opinion over what should be included in the article becomes a problem, please ask for further assistance. Pastordavid (talk) 15:35, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revetec, BSFC

Please use the 212 figure for the Revetec engine. Orbital tested it twice for a good reason. Unless you can provide evidence that other engines are using figures that are the best of a given set of runs, rather than the average, then I will mercilessly revert your edits. Also Revetec has plenty of information on its own page, it does not need more puffery on the BSFC page. Incidentally there is no such thing as a moderator on wiki. Greg Locock (talk) 03:11, 26 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]