User talk:Gtanswell

Brynglas House

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Brynglas House, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. If you agree with the deletion of the article, and you are the only person who has made substantial edits to the page, please add {{db-author}} to the top of Brynglas House. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 16:14, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Brynglas House

A tag has been placed on Brynglas House requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not indicate the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable, as well as our subject-specific notability guideline for biographies.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the article (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the article's talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Pumpmeup^{(is awake!)} 16:19, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Brynglas House

I have nominated Brynglas House, an article you created, for deletion. I do not feel that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Brynglas House. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. FisherQueen (talk · contribs) 17:22, 17 December 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Time-space (de)compression

I have nominated Time-space (de)compression, an article you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Time-space (de)compression. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time. Terraxos (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC) Terraxos (talk) 02:42, 6 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:Welsh Assembly Traffic Officer

Yup, made sure of that and changed the other links. Mind if I change Talk:Welsh Assembly Traffic Officer to be a redirect to Talk:Trunk road agency? ninety:one (reply on my talk) 23:05, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! No problem, it was something that had needed doing for a while. ninety:one (reply on my talk) 23:10, 4 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Amy Kitcher for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Amy Kitcher is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Amy Kitcher until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. QueenCake (talk) 19:00, 28 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ysgol Gyfun Gwynllyw.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ysgol Gyfun Gwynllyw.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:28, 23 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]