User talk:Gsp8181

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, then place {{Talkback|your username}} on my talk.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Gsp8181}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Archives

no archives yet (create)

Parker Kindred

I undid your revert as it removed all references. I took away the Myspace external link, wasn't aware you weren't supposed to use that. Can i remove the notability and referencing tags too? Sillyfolkboy (talk) 18:46, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry, I thought I was reverting the myspace link but infact I must've got the was and now the wrong way round, Must've been unreverting the link >:( Sorry! Gsp (talk) 18:55, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problems. I can see it was an honest mistake! thanks. Sillyfolkboy (talk) 19:21, 6 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you

Thank you for tagging the 163.153.22.20 user page. The district is in the midst of checking logs to find the individuals involved. They also wanted to let you know that "We have no tolerance for this type of behavior". --NERIC-Security (talk) 17:10, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

No problemo, Just rving vandalism :-) Gsp (talk) 17:32, 7 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Revert?

Did you mean to do this? I don't see an obvious reason to revert that edit. Friday (talk) 16:27, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Aha, I hit the wrong article there on Lupins Anti Vandal Tool, Sorry to all affected :-( Gsp (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, no big deal. Friday (talk) 16:29, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Did you meant to this? I don't see an obvious reason to revert that edit. Endless Dan 16:33, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I've just answered that above, Nope, Accident with Anti Vandal Tool :-( Gsp (talk) 16:35, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Eh, no big deal. Endless Dan 16:40, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hmm? Gsp (talk) 16:41, 9 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Rowdy Rams deleted

My page for Rowdy Rams was deleted without my knowledge as well as the photos last nite right after I finished working on it for the last 5 months. I stated that I had the right to both photos and info because I'm apart of the organization that the article was about. I was hoping you could save my page. its Rowdy Rams, which the VCU student supporters. Quite similar to Cameron Crazies of Duke. The person who deleted my article gave no warning to deleting it and deleted the photos on copyright suspicion despite the photos belonging to me. I also had references and sources for all my info from espn sites and our organization group online

Rowdy Rams Continued

I mentioned last week that Rowdy Rams page and pictures had been deleted. The article itself was deleting without warning or heads up. User: Anetode finally simply stated I didn't think it was important. The Rowdy Rams are a well known name not just in the CAA Conference but is mentioned frequently on ESPN. ESPN is a channel known for broadcasting sports around the globe so its highly unlikely anything said on a channel such as that woulddn't be important. I would like that to be highly considered in the decision in the deletion of the article. Something of low importance would not be broadcasted around the globe—Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightstanger (talk • contribs) 18:48, 11 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I haven't got it sorry :-( Gsp (talk) 13:11, 12 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Would there be a way for you to get in contact with this user? He seemed not really care just because he didn't know what it was. I been working on that page for over 5 months. I would have expected some warning or even a better explanation than it didn't seem important for removing my article. I had members of that organization viewing our new page only to find one night it no longer existed. Not to mention be accused of copyright infringement on a article and pictures of which I owned and had full rights to, which was had been noted as well as the sources supporting my article —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightstanger (talk • contribs) 04:32, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I would suggest to leave a message on his user:talk page, I'm in the same position to contact him as you are ;-) Gsp (talk) 14:11, 13 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I been trying to talk to him but the officer doesn't respond or even seem to care what so ever. I figured maybe another officer might be able to help me out —Preceding unsigned comment added by Nightstanger (talk • contribs) 00:49, 14 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Try http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Category:Wikipedia_administrators_who_will_provide_copies_of_deleted_articles Gsp (talk) 18:20, 2 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ICER Brands, LLC

Hi, Im not sure why this has a "speedy deletion tag"

The article is referenced, completely neutral, and relevant because it talks about a company who does the marketing & owns the licensing rights to Apple Bottoms, a brand that is both international, and well established. Amongst a number of other established brands, that were listed as well. Please tell me what needs to be done to remove the Speedy deletion tag. Thanks —Preceding unsigned comment added by Dmanzor (talk • contribs) 15:36, 3 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I run an addon that automates the process, Must've been a false positive sorry Gsp (talk) 17:54, 4 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Need Help!

Hello Gsp8181, this is Survir. There is this article name Saat Phere, which is about an Indian television series. As you probably have noticed, people countinue to add episode synopsis (or storylines) into the main page under the plot section, which made the article too long and create many problems. So what I did is that I transfered all the information into a seperate page called Saat Phere Storylines, which I'm going to edit/improve by leaving just the original plot/concept of the television program into the main page, but I really need your help in managing this seperate page and save the article from getting destroyed by anonymous user (Someone already removed the cast/character information, as it took me so long to find characters real names). So can you please help me. I will be really thankful to you. Your new wiki friend Survir, 16 October 2008, 9:32 (UTC).

Try this http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Saat_Phere&oldid=245333316 Gsp (talk) 16:35, 16 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Your request for rollback

After reviewing your request for rollback, I have enabled rollback on your account. Keep in mind these things when going to use rollback:

Getting rollback is no more momentous than installing Twinkle.
Rollback can be used to revert vandalism only, and not good faith edits.
Rollback may be removed at any time.

If you no longer want rollback, then contact me and I'll remove it. Also, for some information on how to use rollback, you can view this page. I'm sure you'll do great with rollback, just leave me a message if you run into troubles or have any questions about appropriate/inappropriate use of rollback. Happy editing! Tiptoety ^talk 14:13, 17 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Cheers! Gsp 8181 15:37, 27 October 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have to disagree with your evaluation that my edits were not "constructive". They improved the article (as I explained in the edit history) and did not violate any rules of Wikipedia. Please explain your thought process. 173.70.141.227 (talk)Kolef88

Re: December 2008

Please review your reversion. I just removed possibly libelous charges out of there. Next time, please take care while reverting. Alexius08 (talk) 10:43, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism to my talk page

Thanks for the quick revert of vandalism that appeared on my talk page, it's very much appreciated :). Thanks again, Schumi555 (talk) 17:10, 9 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

User talk:Shannon914

Hi GSP, can I suggest you rethink and perhaps ~~strikeout~~ your comment at User talk:Shannon914? It looked to me like she was blanking an article she wrote as a request to delete it. 16:45, 2 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just noticed that, Thought it was an article blanker before I realised the content, tagged it for her and rolled back my mistake, forgot about the warning! Thanks for the heads up Gsp 8181 08:15, 3 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

-

OK I get it - thanks for warning me!

The second one was by accident, sorry! Gsp 8181 10:26, 12 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:DPRK rally.jpg

Dunno where you're getting this idea about "breaking North Korean law". No one has mentioned that- we're talking about the non-free content criteria. J Milburn (talk) 19:30, 18 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I should have expanded on it, I meant to say, Breaking NK law because there would be no none copyright alternative, NK hardly releases anything anywayGsp 8181 09:48, 19 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please update your status with WP:VG

Dear WikiProject Video games member,

You are receiving this message because you have either Category:WikiProject Video games members or {{User WPVG}} somewhere in your userspace and you have edited Wikipedia in the recent months.

The Video games project has created a member list to provide a clearer picture of its active membership.

All members have currently been placed in the "Inactive" section by default. Please remove your username from the "Inactive" listing and place it under the "Active" listing if you plan on regularly:

Editing video game-related pages in the Article namespace
Participating in video game-related discussions in the Project namespace (WT:VG, WP:AfD, WP:GAN, etc.)

Ideally, members are encouraged to do both, but either one meets our criteria of inclusion. Members still listed inactive at the beginning of November 2009 may be removed. You may re-add yourself to the active list at any time. Thank you for your help, and we look forward to working with you.

—WikiProject Video games (delivery by xenobot 03:29, 24 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

For the guideline on reviewing, see Wikipedia:Reviewing. Being granted reviewer rights doesn't change how you can edit articles even with pending changes. The general help page on pending changes can be found here, and the general policy for the trial can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. —DoRD (talk) 11:53, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gsp8181. You have new messages at Cannonbolt2's talk page.
Message added 11:53, 10 August 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Jason Leopold

This has simply gotten ridiculous. I'm drafting a user conduct RfC at User:Yworo/draft. I've never done one of these before, have you? Could you collaborate on getting it properly filled out? Yworo (talk) 22:02, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I can help you out with it, but it will have to be tomorrow morning as I have a headache and it's stopping me from concentrating

Description should be (generally) that he has been blocked for edit warring and 3rr on both accounts using one to ban evade the other, threats of legal action, npov, trying to force changes into the article without consensus etc. The first paragraph should be generally about why you think the user is being uncooperative. Second paragraph should be the users more recent behaviour, particular behaviour that is directly ignoring an sysops advice after an unblock
Evidence of Disputed behaviour, diffs of changes he has attempted to make, general uncooperativeness, any legal threats, any personal attacks or taunts, repeated 3rr's etc, particulary messages you have received that back up the description, for instance, if a John Doe says he will sue you for all your money in your talk page you would link the diff where he makes that threat.
Applicable policies and guidelines, link all the policies you show he has violated
Evidence of trying to resolve the dispute, you would link things you have said to him to try and calm him down, etc telling him to reach a consensus on the talk page before editing, and what he has said back
Evidence of failing to resolve the dispute, link continued edits and messages etc
Users certifying the basis for this dispute, sign and people who were active in trying to resolve (by adding their messages to the rfc) would sign here
Other users who endorse this summary, Other users sign this who have looked at the case and agree
Ignore sections Response and Outside View for now
EVIDENCE OF DISP BEHAVIOR, EVIDENCE OF TRYING TO RESOLVE, EVIDENCE OF FAILIURE, all have a seperate subheader for each user who add their own diffs

Hope this helps, il file my part in the morning :) Gsp 8181 22:48, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

oh and check the already filed requests, should be of helpGsp 8181 22:50, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Great, thanks. I don't expect to get this done today, as I have other business to attend to shortly. However, I've documented all the IP addresses and they all geolocate primarily to LA and Beverly Hills. Surprise, surprise. Yworo (talk) 22:56, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Okay, I've had enough for today. I'm sure you can come up with more, as well as your attempts to educate the user and resolve the problems. I'll check back in tomorrow. Yworo (talk) 06:18, 15 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Jimmy at AN/I

Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there currently is a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Request for community ban of Jimmy McDaniels. Yworo (talk) 06:49, 19 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Huggle

Hi there, it seems you managed to solve the 'unable to log in' problem for a Wikipedian before - could you possibly do the same for me (i.e. upload a version of 0.9.11 with that line commented out)? It would be much appreciated. It Is Me Here ^{t / c} 19:54, 26 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I took so long to reply, dont check wikipedia as often as i'd like :) made a version of the latest 2.1.3 huggle at [1]. if you need any other versions email me and i'd be happy to help! Gsp 8181 22:19, 30 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Primary school redirect

Hi Gsp8181, Primary schools that don't meet notability standards here get redirected to the schools location per WP:OUTCOMES as well as per Consensus at AFDs,
I couldn't find anything to establish notability but if you can please revert and readd ... If not then it'll have to stay as it is,
Thanks and Happy editing, –Davey2010^Talk 16:42, 12 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Gsp8181. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Gsp8181. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Gsp8181. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

"Doctor who 1963-2008" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Doctor who 1963-2008. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 March 21#Doctor who 1963-2008 until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Dominicmgm (talk) 23:16, 21 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]