User talk:Gsaxena1809

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. However, the reviewer felt that a few things need to be fixed before it is accepted. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved. (You can do this by adding the text {{subst:submit}} to the top of the article.)

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan.
To edit the submission, you can use the edit button at the top of the article, near the search bar
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Help desk or the reviewer's talk page. Alternatively you can ask a reviewer questions via live help

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Bryce (talk | contribs) 01:05, 1 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Ram Ki JalSamadhi

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Ram Ki JalSamadhi requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. Hallows AG 12:18, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Kavi bharat bhushan ji.jpg

Hello, Gsaxena1809!

It was really helpful of you to upload File:Kavi bharat bhushan ji.jpg, but in order to keep new images, we need to know their exact source and copyright status.

If you can edit the description page and add that information, that would be great. If you're not sure how or would like some help, please ask us at the media copyright questions page and we'll be happy to assist you.

Thanks again! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 17:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

More information needed about File:Sh bharat bhushan ji.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Sh bharat bhushan ji.jpg. However, it needs some more information before it is okay to use on Wikipedia.

Please click here and do the following:

Add a description of where the image is from and who the author is. Please be specific, and include a link if possible.
Find the appropriate license from the list of free, non-free media, or public domain options. Copy the license template and paste it in the file's page, and save.

If you follow these steps, your image can help enhance Wikipedia. If you have any questions, feel free to ask at the media copyright questions page.

Thank you for your contribution! --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 18:07, 8 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sagar ke seep

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sagar ke seep requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, contest the deletion by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". Doing so will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, you can contact one of these administrators to request that the administrator userfy the page or email a copy to you. GILO A&E⇑ 12:36, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

JAnuary 2012

Hello Gsaxena1809. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest or close connection to the subject.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about following the reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:04, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ye Asangati.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ye Asangati.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. JamesBWatson (talk) 13:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ye Asangati

The article Ye Asangati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unsourced article about a book of poetry that appears not to meet Wikipedia's standard for notability of articles about books.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 13:07, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ye Asangati

The article Ye Asangati has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Fails WP:NBOOK

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 13:19, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Ye Asangati for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Ye Asangati is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Ye Asangati until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 13:20, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy at Sagar ke seep

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thanks for taking the time to contribute.

I'm a bot designed by another Wikipedia editor, and I'm here to help you with our deletion process. I noticed that while working on an article recently, you removed a speedy deletion template that tagged it for deletion. Don't get discouraged! Deletion discussions happen on Wikipedia all the time.

If you don't want the article to get deleted, please click here.

The link will take you to the talk page, where you can explain why the article should be kept. If you have any questions about this or need help with editing, you can ask at the Help desk.

We really hope you'll stick around to help make Wikipedia better! Thank you, - SDPatrolBot (talk) 13:32, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Mere Chuninda Geet

The article Mere Chuninda Geet has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Funnyfarmofdoom _{(talk to me)} 14:10, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Mere Chuninda Geet for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Mere Chuninda Geet is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mere Chuninda Geet until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 14:41, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

January 2012

To be the subject of a Wikipedia article, a topic has to satisfy Wikipedia's notability standards. Please do not keep creating articles about works with no notability, just because they are connected with your family. If you do, you may be blocked from editing. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:55, 9 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sagar ke seep.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sagar ke seep.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 05:42, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Response to your comments on my talk page

You wrote on my talk page: "You gave a reason saying that the article was created only because he's my gandfather." That's simply not true. Here is what I actually wrote:

Unreferenced article about a book of poetry. No indication that this book is notable and specifically no evidence it meets WP:NBOOK. Google searching throws up a few mentions, but no obvious reliable sources. This is one of a set of articles by the same author that suffer from the same problems - they are evidently about the works of the author's grandfather and are here to help the author write an article about his grandfather.

I suggested the article be deleted because it was unreferenced and does not meet Wikipedia's standard for notability of books. When I wrote that your articles are "here to help the author write an article about his grandfather." that was a direct quote of what you wrote. It was not the reason why I suggested the article be deleted and it was not the reason that the article was deleted after a debate. If you can cite reliable sources that show how the subject does meet WP:NBOOK then you can recreate the article. But please be aware that verifiability is a non-negotiable part of Wikipedia's rules. This means you must have reliable sources in the article. Merely asserting that the article is notable is not enough. Good luck, Sparthorse (talk) 21:55, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Mere chuninda Geet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Mere chuninda Geet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude2 (talk) 22:22, 19 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Ye Asangati.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Ye Asangati.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 19:06, 1 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article submission Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan

Hello Gsaxena1809. It has now been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan.

If you no longer want this submission, it will shortly be deleted. However, if you wish to keep it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia:Articles for creation/Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will place the undeleted submission in your user space.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. j⚛e decker ^talk 20:48, 4 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:11, 5 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan

Hello Gsaxena1809. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Geet Samrat: Kavi Bharat Bhushan}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 08:00, 1 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]