User talk:Gsaup

Welcome!

Hello, Gsaup, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! --Esprit15d 14:33, 31 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

The article Black swan management has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable neologism

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 11:45, 24 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Dark side of planning

The article Dark side of planning has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The term is rarely used in the real world.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 17:01, 12 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Dark side of planning for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Dark side of planning is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Dark side of planning until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. — Arthur Rubin (talk) 14:52, 13 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Courtesy backup copy

I've made you a courtesy backup copy of User:Gsaup/Dark side of planning. It looks like you've received some rough treatment by our administrative corps. Unfortunately, the process Wikipedia uses to determine who holds these positions tends to favor those who lack social skills and who lack the ability to communicate clearly and effectively. Please accept my apologies in advance and feel free to contact me for any help in the future. Thanks. Viriditas (talk) 02:05, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Also, you may be interested in reviewing the discussion over at Talk:Planetary boundaries, where Arthur made the same claims he is making about the dark side of planning. Why he is repeatedly making false arguments about concepts he personally disagrees with is a serious question that needs to be asked. Viriditas (talk) 08:34, 14 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I really appreciate your kind comment and help, and I'm surprised by the tone of the critique. Gsaup

Blocked as a sockpuppet

This account has been blocked indefinitely as a sock puppet of Sonderbro (talk · contribs · global contribs · page moves · user creation · block log) that was created to violate Wikipedia policy. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but using them for illegitimate reasons is not. If this account is not a sock puppet, and you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here ~~~~}} below, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.
— Berean Hunter (talk) 12:46, 8 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]