Welcome!

Hello, Gs814, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as One America News Network, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! JetBlast (talk) 21:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of One America News Network

The article One America News Network has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Not really notable

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JetBlast (talk) 21:03, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

advice=

Welcome to Wikipedia . We're always glad to have articles on notable new subjects. But the rules are that an article on an organization needs to show notability with references providing substantial coverage from 3rd party independent published reliable sources, print or online, but not press releases, or material derived from press releases. For One America News Network , if you have such sources, it may be possible to rewrite the article; otherwise, it will not be possible until such sources are published.

As you expand the article, remember that a Wikipedia article needs to be written like an encyclopedia article, not a press release--don't praise the organization or person, say what they do Don't include material that would better belong in an advertisement or a web page, such as a detailed list of products or of executives or branch offices.Remember not to copy from a web site, even your own -- first it's a copyright violation, but, even if you own the copyright and are willing to give us permission according to WP:DCM (permission that irrevocably gives everyone in the world the right to copy, reuse, and modify the material) , the tone will not be encyclopedic and the material will not be suitable. (Thus, there is generally no purpose in giving permission; it is better to rewrite.)

Include only material that would be of interest to a general reader coming across the mention of the subject and wanting the sort of information that would be found in an encyclopedia. Do not include material that would be of interest only to those associated with the subject, or to prospective clients/purchasers/students/supporters/donors--that sort of content is considered promotional.

As reviewing administrator, I removed the prod tag and placed an "underconstruction" tag on the article which should give you a few days to find sources before it gets listed for deletion. If you find you can't do it yet you can facilitate matters by placing at the top a line reading : {{db-author}}, and it will be quickly deleted.. When you have the necessary material, then try again. I do not want to discourage you, but to encourage you to continue to contribute. DGG ( talk ) 21:16, 5 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice! I have made sure a couple sources and additional information have been added and hopefully that will do for now. I know more information will become available as the network is apparently just now launching. Gs814 (talk) 05:32, 6 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Gs814, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Gs814! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! SarahStierch (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:18, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:One America News Network logo.jpg

The file File:One America News Network logo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This appears to be a former logo no longer being used by the network for primary identification purpose and which is not (depsite the claim made in the non-free use rationale) being used in the main infobox or at the top of the article. This means that it's non-free use is not much harder to justify. Generally, former logos are only allowed when the context for non-free use required by WP:NFCC#8 is being clearly provided through some sourced critical commentary of the logo itself as explained in WP:NFC#cite_note-4. I cannot find any content at all in the article related to the network's choice of logos or it's branding; so, omitting this file is not going to be detrimental to the reader's understanding in any way.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- Marchjuly (talk) 02:01, 9 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]