User talk:Grumpy goat 99

This account is a sockpuppet of Mr Wiki Pro (talk · contribs · logs), and has been blocked indefinitely.
Please refer to the sockpuppet investigation of the sockpuppeteer, and editing habits or contributions of the sockpuppet for evidence. This policy subsection may be helpful.

Account information: block log – contribs – logs – abuse log – CentralAuth

January 2014

Hello, I'm MusikAnimal. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions, such as the one you made with this edit to Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard, because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. — MusikAnimal ^talk 17:42, 8 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Jim1138 (talk) 17:53, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello there. I have blocked you indefinitely as a vandalism-only account. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Bishonen | talk 18:23, 8 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grumpy goat 99 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I am a sockpuppet

Decline reason:

Whatever. As you wish. --jpgordon^{::==( o )} 19:37, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Well, I'm shocked! Shocked! Bishonen | talk 18:55, 8 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]

HeHeHe. Your better than the other admins-they just revoke my talk page access--Grumpy goat 99 (talk) 19:02, 8 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

As long as you go easy, I won't. But somebody else may. Bishonen | talk 22:08, 8 January 2014 (UTC).[reply]