User talk:Groovyman1969

word up!

Sentences. Complete ones.

I loved your edit summary :) --dab (𒁳) 09:08, 10 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanking you, I am! -Groovyman1969 (talk) 01:40, 11 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your note

For what it's worth, the talk page matter must have been an edit overlap, as I was already responding to you when you deleted the message. So, no "dead horse" quips please. --Ckatz^chat _spy 19:01, 27 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I see; it was just an edit conflict and my subsequent misunderstanding. Sorry about that; I removed my comment from your talk page. Thanks & happy editing, Groovyman1969 (talk) 02:25, 28 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion at Family Research Council

Someone restarted the straw poll re: including the SPLC's characterization in the lead. You are getting this because you participated in the last poll. Please see Talk:Family Research Council to give your input on its inclusion.-- Kim van der Linde ^{at venus} 16:03, 9 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]