User talk:Gromoror

Welcome!

Hello, Gromoror, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! Active Banana (talk) 21:09, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to make constructive contributions to Wikipedia, but at least one of your recent edits, such as the one you made to Wikia, did not appear to be constructive and has been automatically reverted by ClueBot.

Please use the sandbox for any test edits you would like to make, and take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
Cluebot produces very few false positives, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been detected as unconstructive, please report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Wikia was changed by Gromoror (u) (t) deleting 29194 characters on 2010-05-21T23:56:18+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot (talk) 23:56, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did with this edit to the page Fantastik. Such edits constitute vandalism and are reverted. Please do not continue to make unconstructive edits to pages; use the sandbox for testing. Thank you. ... discospinster _talk 00:04, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not remove content from pages without explanation, as you did with this edit to Wikia. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. ... discospinster _talk 00:11, 22 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

This is the final warning you will receive regarding your disruptive edits. The next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did to Fantastik, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. -- Gogo Dodo (talk) 20:55, 24 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Active Banana has given you a cookie! Cookies promote WikiLove and hopefully this one has made your day better. Spread the WikiLove by giving someone else a cookie, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Happy munching!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:Cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat this cookie on the giver's talk page with {{subst:munch}}!

Thanks for the cookie!

Active Banana has eaten your {{cookie}}! The cookie made them happy and they'd like to give you a great big hug for donating it. Spread the WikiLove by giving out more {{cookie}}s, whether it be someone you have had disagreements with in the past or a good friend. Thanks again!

Spread the goodness of cookies by adding {{subst:cookie}} to someone's talk page with a friendly message, or eat a cookie with {{subst:munch}}!

Active Banana (talk) 00:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Fantastik

If you would like to see the Fantastik article stay as a stand alone article, you can use information from the specific sites identified [1] or [2] (except for the sites marked "blog") to add information about the company's history, major ad campaigns, controversies that may have involved the product (see WP:NPOV) or other information that has been covered. Note that you will need to cite the sources, either formally or at least with a link to the site between <:ref> source of the material goes here <:/ref> (but you would take out the colons)

Here is what a midrange article about a company might look like: Land O'Lakes. Active Banana (talk) 00:36, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also note, that after you have put a lot of effort in improving an article, it is common to think of it as YOUR article, but it is not, and so you have to get used to the fact that others will be contributing to content that you have added. Active Banana (talk) 00:40, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Also, even if the current article gets deleted, you can work on a replacement on a user subpage User:Gromoror/fantastik and when you get it into good shape, ask that it be moved back to article space. Active Banana (talk) 00:58, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Further vandalism

Following the final warning above you have continued with vandalism, as in this edit, this one, and this one. I would normally be reporting this to Administrators' Intervention against Vandalism. However, since these pieces of vandalism have gone unreported for a while and you have done none since, I am prepared to give you another chance. However, please do not return to this kind of unconstructive editing, or you will be blocked. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:55, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I vow to no longer disrupt wikipedia Gromoror (talk) 16:24, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your commitment! A lot of people get off to rocky starts - working in a collaborative environment can take a lot of adjustment. If you have questions, please feel free to ask - on my talk page or for perhaps a quicker response, with the {helpme} tag. Active Banana (talk) 16:49, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiLove

Wikipedia has

policies which must be followed by everyone, "all the time"
guidelines which should be followed by everyone, but there are some occasions where it makes sense to do otherwise

and

essays which are more personal opinions that can help editors interperet and apply the policies and guidelines.

WikiLove is an "essay". The best place to get advice on Wikilove is Wikipedia talk:WikiLove. It does not appear that it is a very active site, and so you may want to contact one of the more active members on the talk page directly if you do not get a response on the talk page within a day or so. Active Banana (talk) 22:08, 26 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at User talk:JamesBWatson. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. See this policy, and stop goofing about. TFOWR^propaganda 23:06, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not attack other contributors, as you did with this edit to User talk:174.26.20.3. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing. 5 albert square (talk) 23:12, 27 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing, for a period of 72 hours, for abuse of editing privileges. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make constructive contributions. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal the block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Peter 23:22, 27 May 2010 (UTC)

Disappointed

I am a little disappointed. I stood up for you a number of times. You stated that you would no longer disrupt Wikipedia, and I believed you. That makes me sad.

When this block is over, I do hope that you truly decide to contribute positively to the community - which is here to build an encyclopedia, not chit chat back and forth, but you will have to actively show that you are in fact capable of being a productive member before I will be able to show any support for you again.Active Banana (talk) 02:20, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Amongst other recent disruptive editing I see a whole thread of trolling you put on my talk page, in which you pretended to be two different editors. This edit and this one are particularly interesting. JamesBWatson (talk) 08:51, 28 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

And the recreation of [[3]. It was deleted for a reason and your recreation without any attempt to provide the required sourcing is another mark of disruptive behavior on your record. Active Banana (talk) 20:59, 5 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

June 2010

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for repeated abuse of editing privileges. If you would like to be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} below, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Peter 09:03, 12 June 2010 (UTC)