User talk:Grislydan

Duplicate images uploaded

Thanks for uploading Image:Eddie, Curt, Dan, Ben P., Chris, Jeff.jpg. A machine-controlled robot account noticed that you also uploaded the same image under the name Image:Eddie, Curt, Dan, Ben P., Chris, Jeff.JPG. The copy called Image:Eddie, Curt, Dan, Ben P., Chris, Jeff.JPG has been marked for speedy deletion since it is redundant. If this sounds okay to you, there is no need for you to take any action.

This is an automated message- you have not upset or annoyed anyone. In the future, you may save yourself some confusion if you supply a meaningful file name and remember exactly which name you chose (file names are case sensitive, including the extension) so that you won't lose track of your uploads. For tips on good file naming, see Wikipedia's image use policy. If you have any questions about this notice, or feel that the deletion is inappropriate, please contact User:Staecker, who operates the robot account. Staeckerbot 04:48, 11 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The Shape of Sola Scriptura

A "{{prod}}" template has been added to the article The Shape of Sola Scriptura, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process. All contributions are appreciated, but the article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice explains why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may contest the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page. Also, please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Flex (talk/contribs) 13:33, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of The Merge Ministry

I've nominated The Merge Ministry and Refresh Worship Toronto, articles you created, for deletion. We appreciate your contributions, but in this particular case I do not feel that either satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion; I have explained why in the nomination space (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and the Wikipedia deletion policy). Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Merge Ministry and please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~). You are free to edit the content of these articles during the discussion but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the articles; such removal will not end the deletion discussion. Thank you. --Flex (talk/contribs) 15:47, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Invite

You are cordially invited to participate in WikiProject Calvinism

The goal of WikiProject Calvinism is to improve the quality and quantity of information about Calvinism available on Wikipedia. WP:WikiProject Calvinism as a group does not prefer any particular tradition or denominination of Calvinism, but prefers that all Calvinist traditions are fairly and accurately represented.

--Flex (talk/contribs) 15:48, 22 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Notability of Arnold Reimer

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Arnold Reimer, by SkierRMH (talk · contribs), another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Arnold Reimer seems to be about a person, group of people, band, club, company, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is notable: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, articles that do not assert the subject's importance or significance may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Arnold Reimer, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Please note, this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Arnold Reimer itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. --Android Mouse Bot 2 07:43, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Bayview Glen Church

This article was deleted as a repost; see Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Bayview Glen Church. NawlinWiki 20:06, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Christina_&_Ben_Porter.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Christina_&_Ben_Porter.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Dan_th.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Dan_th.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:09, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Graham_Legiehn.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Graham_Legiehn.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Adriel_Clayton.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adriel_Clayton.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Zee_Nasser.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Zee_Nasser.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:10, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eddie,_Curt,_me,_Ben,_Chris,_Jeff_3.JPG listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eddie,_Curt,_me,_Ben,_Chris,_Jeff_3.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 22:11, 26 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Awtozer.gif

Thanks for uploading Image:Awtozer.gif. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 05:46, 27 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Jdcarlson.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Jdcarlson.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:30, 29 June 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Kwopperman.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Kwopperman.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:31, 1 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Erica,_Curt,_&_Andrea.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Erica,_Curt,_&_Andrea.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Curt,_Matt_C.,_&_Ben_P..jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Curt,_Matt_C.,_&_Ben_P..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:08, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Andrea_&_Erica.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Andrea_&_Erica.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ben_P.,_Curt,_Ted,_Erica,_&_Matt_C..jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ben_P.,_Curt,_Ted,_Erica,_&_Matt_C..jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:09, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Merge_Front_Outlook.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Merge_Front_Outlook.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:The_Merge_Ministry's_Missions_Team_to_Ghana_(2006).jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:The_Merge_Ministry's_Missions_Team_to_Ghana_(2006).jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Jerven_and_Sarah_Weekes.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Jerven_and_Sarah_Weekes.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:10, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Ben,_Jeff,_and_Curt.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Ben,_Jeff,_and_Curt.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Eddie,_Curt,_Dan,_Ben_P.,_Chris,_Jeff.jpg listed for deletion

An image or media file that you uploaded or altered, Image:Eddie,_Curt,_Dan,_Ben_P.,_Chris,_Jeff.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Images and media for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. User:Gay Cdn (talk) (Contr) 01:11, 2 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Shapesolascriptura.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Shapesolascriptura.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 07:58, 4 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:01 The Old Kings (untitled).jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:01 The Old Kings (untitled).jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:01 The Old Kings (untitled).jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[1][2]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:01 The Old Kings (untitled).jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:02 The Old Kings (Going to the Opera).jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:02 The Old Kings (Going to the Opera).jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:02 The Old Kings (Going to the Opera).jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[3][4]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:02 The Old Kings (Going to the Opera).jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:03 The Old Kings (Welcome to the Inn of Happiness).jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:03 The Old Kings (Welcome to the Inn of Happiness).jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:03 The Old Kings (Welcome to the Inn of Happiness).jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[5][6]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:03 The Old Kings (Welcome to the Inn of Happiness).jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:04 The Old Kings (Divine Society).jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:04 The Old Kings (Divine Society).jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:04 The Old Kings (Divine Society).jpg has a copyright license type implying some type of restricted use, such as for non-commercial use only, or for educational use only or for use on Wikipedia by permission, which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3). While it might seem reasonable to assume that such files can be freely used on Wikipedia, this is in fact not the case[7][8]. Please do not upload any more files with these restrictions on them, because content on Wikipedia needs to be compatible with the GNU Free Documentation License, which allows anyone to use it for any purpose, commercial or non-commercial. See our non-free content guidelines for more more information.

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:04 The Old Kings (Divine Society).jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 18:01, 20 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Solid Rock (delirious?)

This is an automated message from CorenSearchBot. I have performed a web search with the contents of Solid Rock (delirious?), and it appears to include a substantial copy of http://www.delirious.org.uk/lyrics/songs/solidrock.html. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences.

This message was placed automatically, and it is possible that the bot is confused and found similarity where none actually exists. If that is the case, you can remove the tag from the article and it would be appreciated if you could drop a note on the maintainer's talk page. CorenSearchBot 22:36, 10 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Drraj.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Drraj.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 08:12, 14 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009)

The article Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article about a DVD with no evidence that this is notable and in particular the subject appears not to meet Wikipedia's notability requirements for films.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Sparthorse (talk) 09:10, 14 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on good quality evidence, and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. Sparthorse (talk) 07:40, 15 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Coconut Generation

The article The Coconut Generation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable book; no references to reliable sources.

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. AndrewWTaylor (talk) 15:18, 21 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Coconut Generation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Coconut Generation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Coconut Generation until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Bgwhite (talk) 06:48, 10 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:07, 20 March 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009)

Hello Grislydan. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Darwin vs. Calvin: The Battle of the Millennium (2009)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 20:00, 28 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Coconut Generation

The article The Coconut Generation has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

no evident notability

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 15:37, 15 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Coconut Generation for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Coconut Generation is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Coconut Generation (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Chris Cunningham (user:thumperward) (talk) 10:16, 23 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Joshua Raj

The article Joshua Raj has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

No strong third-party sources with significant coverage of this person. Nearly all of the references are primary (publisher links, Amazon links, etc).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 17:41, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:DC Handball Court.png

The file File:DC Handball Court.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 22 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Michael Graham (rugby player)

The article Michael Graham (rugby player) has been proposed for deletion because it appears to have no references. Under Wikipedia policy, this biography of a living person will be deleted after seven days unless it has at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp/dated}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within seven days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Mdaniels5757 (talk) 18:11, 17 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Association of International Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario

The article Association of International Physicians and Surgeons of Ontario has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This organization, if it was ever real, seems to be defunct. No 3rd party sources and their website has been down since 2011. Facebook page just shows unrelated ads.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. WestRiding24 (talk) 03:16, 21 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]