User talk:Gringinu

Welcome!

Hello, IcedJelly, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your recent edits to the page San Anton School did not conform to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may have been removed. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations verified in reliable, reputable print or online sources or in other reliable media. Always provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to The Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Introduction tutorial
Contributing to Wikipedia
How to edit a page
Introduction to referencing
Help pages
Simplified Manual of Style
Task Center – need some ideas of what kind of things need doing? Go here.

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need personal help ask me on my talk page, or ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome. Julietdeltalima (talk) 16:38, 24 October 2022 (UTC)[reply]

April 2023

Hello, I'm Mr.weedle. I noticed that in this edit to San Andrea School, you removed content without adequately explaining why. In the future, it would be helpful to others if you described your changes to Wikipedia with an edit summary. If this was a mistake, don't worry, the removed content has been restored. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Mr.weedle (talk) 05:53, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Cuz the school SMACKED the shit out of me since I added that and also i didnt want my school to have a bad name.

who are you? IcedJelly (talk) 13:36, 26 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dynamic Pixels (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Vrxces was:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just brief mentions about the subject or routine announcements)
reliable
secondary
strictly independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet all four of these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Check out WP:GNG and WP:NCORP - articles need to have several reliable sources independent of the subject that discuss the subject in-depth to warrant an article. Happy to discuss on my talk page if you need help!

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Dynamic Pixels and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gringinu! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! ＶＲＸＣＥＳ (talk) 21:17, 29 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hazard Symbol/Safety Sign Merger proposal

You placed a maintenance template on the Hazard Symbol article suggesting it should be merged with Safety sign, but didn't post a proposal explaining why you think they should be merged on the talk page on either article. You should place a new post at the bottom of the talk page, Talk:Safety sign explaining why you think they should be merged. You can see an example of a proposal on Wikipedia:Merging - Step 1: Create a discussion. (You should also add the merger template to the top of the Safety sign article, like you did on Hazard symbol.)

It's hard to respond to the idea if we don't know your rational for it, as well as discuss the idea in a singular place.--The Navigators (talk) 02:22, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Will do, thx Gringinu (talk) 21:38, 28 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Something else I wanted to bring up is that I had an alternative idea, rather than merge hazard symbol with safety sign, what about this:

Split Hazard symbol, creating a new article "safety symbol". Broadening this means we could include non-hazard symbols, and dive into the broader concepts of the history and design. I believe that I have enough reference materials gathered that I could stand up and justify a separate article.

The existing Hazard symbol becomes focused on 'chemical hazard symbols'. (GHS, NFPA 704, EU Directive 67/548, UN ADR & US DOT markings, etc) I think there's enough material that it could be justified as a separate article, and a number of other projects went that route.

I think this would allow us to focus both topics, and provide a more comprehensive examination of them then the current article allows.

I don't think that a merger with safety sign would give us the best outcome. I feel the symbols portion of the topic would get significantly diminished, similar to how safety signs were diminished when they were part of the traffic warning sign article prior to mid-2019. This is the article shortly before the new safety sign article, in May 2019.

I'd be willing to put together the split proposal and get the ball rolling on it. I just have a little bit going on, so I work on it too much right this moment.-- The Navigators (talk) 05:12, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I love it Gringinu (talk) 14:08, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dynamic Pixels

Hello, Gringinu. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dynamic Pixels, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:06, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dynamic Pixels

Hello, Gringinu. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Dynamic Pixels".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 21:02, 29 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]