User talk:Grim23/2009

Coordinates

Just an update to my earlier reply to your message on my talk page: the link to capture recent changes to articles marked with {{coord missing}} should be http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Special:RecentChangesLinked&hidebots=0&target=Category%3ALondon_articles_missing_geocoordinate_data (and so on, with the name of the country or subnational region changed as necessary) in order to capture both human and bot edits. -- The Anome (talk) 09:43, 27 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Location of All-Hallows-the-Less and All-Hallows-the-Great

Yes You are correct. The photos show the locations of the churches- I was very careful with that, but somehow I have transposed tehm Will Untranspose them Bashereyre (talk) 22:03, 13 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dollis Brook Viaduct

I've noticed that you took both the photo of the viaduct and have been involved with the Edgware, Highgate and London Railway. Do you know where i can find more information on the Dollis Brook Viaduct? Simply south (talk) 13:52, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Anything on the history really and the description and other things. I will get a book in a few days saying more about it in some aspects. And thank you. Simply south (talk) 20:40, 21 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Dollis Valley Greenwalk

On June 21, 2009, Did you know? was updated with a fact from the article Dollis Valley Greenwalk, which you created or substantially expanded. If you know of another interesting fact from a recently created article, then please suggest it on the Did you know? talk page.

Mifter (talk) 08:35, 21 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Rollback

I have granted rollback rights to your account; the reason for this is that after a review of some of your contributions, I believe I can trust you to use rollback correctly by using it for its intended usage of reverting vandalism, and that you will not abuse it by reverting good-faith edits or to revert-war. For information on rollback, see Wikipedia:New admin school/Rollback and Wikipedia:Rollback feature. If you do not want rollback, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Good luck and thanks. –Juliancolton | ^Talk 19:09, 13 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent reversion

Hi,

you recently reverted one of my edits to the Battle of Jericho. I gave an explanation for the edit here.

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Talk:Battle_of_Jericho#removal_of_sentence_ii

ReaverFlash (talk) 14:28, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I missed the talk page comment Grim23 (talk) 14:36, 17 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Graffiti

In response to your message, I'm aware of the policy on British/American English. That's actually why I changed "favoured" to "favored"; I didn't see any British English so I thought I was following policy. However, after doing a search of "ou" and "re" I found two instances of "centre" and one of "coloured". My mistake. Gbern3 (talk) 16:32, 27 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Removal of alumni

What possessed you to remove all those people? Do you not have better things to do? DinosaursLoveExistence (talk) 13:00, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I removed some of the people that were included because they were not notable. The rest of the contribution gives useful information to the article. Could you add citations to it to improve the article? Grim²³ ★ 13:38, 5 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Plz be careful with rollback

Hi, would you mind taking a second look at this? Sometimes this place can get rather complex :) Ϣere SpielChequers 13:23, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

That diff is a little embarrassing, I'll be more mindful in future. Thanks for bringing it to my attention Grim²³ ★ 13:36, 8 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar

		The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar
		Given to Grim23 to celebrate Grim's outstanding ability to track and identify multiple IP Vandals, one of the hardest types to bring to justice. Outstanding work, I and all upstanding wikipedians salute you! Jusda fax 01:24, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Agreed

you deserve it. i want to thank you again for watching out for my user page. keep up the good work fellow rollbacker.
>>>> Posted By Alex Waelde (Leave Me A Messgae) 02:53, 7 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Defender of the Wiki Barnstar
		For taking up the challenge of sneaky vandalism hunting at Wikipedia:Reward board and for all your work at helping remove inaccurate information in the project, I award you this defender award Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I would of done a anti vandalism award for you, but you just recieved one, hope you like this one instead Ottawa4ever (talk) 17:34, 12 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Special Thanks

Thank you for reverting the vandalism placed on my user page. I would give you a barnstar if not for the blatant conflict of interest .. :) Nezzadar (speak) 02:32, 13 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Retroactive gift of new award!

		Nezzadar's Rabbit of Appreciation
		Much like rabbits, vandals occur in large numbers and are considered by some to be a nuisance. However while rabbits are cute, vandals are not. For defending my user page from a vandal, and possibly also blocking said vandal, I give you "Nezzadar's Rabbit of Appreciation". Take this random award featuring an image of an adorable mammal, and let it be a sign to others that you fight the good fight. From your completely insane friend, Nezzadar ☎ .

Proposed major reforms to decade articles

Hi - I noticed you have contributed recently to one or more of the decade articles (1990s, 1960s etc). I am proposing some major changes to these articles, as I have outlined in Talk:1990s/Archives/2012#Suggested_reform_of_decade_articles, and I would be interested in hearing your views in the first instance. Thanks. Kransky (talk) 09:05, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You earned this!

		The Userpage Shield
		For reverting vandalism to my User Talk page. Alan (talk) 19:10, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree. - Zhang He (talk) 19:11, 17 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for doing the same for me, keep up the good work! Beeblebrox (talk) 04:19, 20 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

I was gonna be cheap and tack my sig to the section above. However, your efforts on the recent changes page deserve a bit more recognition. Tiderolls 02:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

		The Original Barnstar
		Please accept this token of my appreciation for watching over my user talk. Keep up the good work Tiderolls 02:03, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you Grim²³ ★ 02:04, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Er..I didn't mean to imply that anyone who signed above wasbeing cheap. Only that more additions could be perceived as...well, I'll stop digging this hole and get back to work. Tiderolls 02:17, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Recent Correction to Coconut Crabs

I wanted to ask why my comment to the Coconut Crab page was deemed "unconstructive." I supported my analysis with a direct citation to a reputable source. I think my comment fit very well within the section of the coconut crab diet that was discussing little-known behaviors of the coconut crab. Thank you.

Sorry, it seemed far fetched that coconut crabs were "responsible" for Amelia Earhart's disappearance and seemed out of place in the "Diet" section. On second look I see your edit was in good faith. Sorry again and thank you for contributing to Wikipedia. Grim²³ ★ 03:54, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you. Would you please revert/re-post my contribution to the Coconut Crab page? I think this is a fascinating fact about the coconut crab, and I think it gives an interesting insight into the coconut crab's daily doins'. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 64.132.107.3 (talk) 13:32, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Done, although I'm not sure if this text should be in the diet section. (By the way, to sign your posts type four tildes like this ~~~~) Grim²³ ★ 15:45, 27 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Grim23. You have new messages at Nancy's talk page.
Message added 17:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Nancy ^talk 17:59, 12 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wiki email

Next time you email me, please do it with this new (unbanned) account; & not with the the old banned one.

Ehh, come to think of it; please don´t ever email me again, Thank you. Huldra (talk) 14:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Huldra, you've made a mistake, I use talkpages to communicate to other editors and have only ever had one account. If you disagree with an edit I've made I would be happy to discuss it. Just out of interest, who is the banned editor? No hard feelings :-) Grim²³ ★ 17:56, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

thanks!

For reverting the edits to my user page!Accdude92 (talk to me!) (sign) 20:41, 16 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Grim23. You have new messages at Thejadefalcon's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Possibly unfree File:Tube map minus the river.JPG

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tube map minus the river.JPG, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. --JD554 (talk) 09:43, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covent Garden Hotel

Please review the comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Covent Garden Hotel. You may wish to respond to the comments. -- Eastmain (talk) 17:43, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I was unexpectedly called away, I have now responded. Grim²³ ★ 19:12, 16 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Help re vandalism in the Holy Synod of the Coptic Orthodox Church

Hi Grim 23,

I need your help in preventing User talk:71.195.186.130 from his/her continuous vandalism of the above-mentioned page. It seems that there is a feud in the Coptic Orthodox parish in Fresno, California (which is under Patriarchal jurisdiction, within the Archdiocese of North America) causing some to create a fake diocese that he/she insist to add, supported by a web page of a non existing diocese, which, odly enough, redicules that so-called self installe priest (bishop) in words and with the use of a composite photo of that priest dressed in episcopal vestment to prove the point of who ever created that web page. I have tried many times to stop his attempts by failed to bring common sense to his/her persisted vandalism. I see that you have adressed an issue before with the subject in question, perhaps you can ban him/her from future edits. Thank you. Orthopraxia (talk) 21:25, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I'm keeping an eye on the editor and page, but I don't think I've enough knowledge of this area, so I've asked some other rollbackers, who have interests in this area, to have a look at the edits. Grim²³ ★ 01:20, 23 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hat's Off

You cannot see me, but I not only tip my hat, but completely remove it in honor of your protection on my talk page. "Click Here" Morning277 (talk) 02:32, 24 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]