User talk:GrewalJ

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:GrewalJ/Diana Penty has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diana Penty, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article. Your draft is waiting for a review by an experienced editor, if you have any questions please ask on our Help Desk! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 22:58, 22 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diana Penty.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Loriski (talk) 12:54, 26 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! GrewalJ, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. Any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

June 2012

Please do not continue to upload files with missing or false information on their copyright status. Please note that Wikipedia takes copyright and copyright infringement very seriously. Images and other media may only be uploaded and included if they meet the conditions stated in our image use policy, and if their provenance is clearly documented. If you have questions, feel free to ask at the copyright question page or on my talk page. Thank you. Fut.Perf. ☼ 08:42, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Jacqueline Fernandez

In your recent edits to Jacqueline Fernandez, you asserted a particular birthdate for her that is not actually supported by the source cited. Wikipedia requires sources for all it content, in particular, the encyclopedia cannot present information about living persons such as this actress unless the information is verifiable to a reliable source.

Additionally, your edits added some content that is best described as gossip. This is an encyclopedia where gossip is not appropriate content. See WP:NOT and WP:BLP for discussion of this issue.

I have reverted most of your edits due to these concerns. Please understand that this is in hope of maintaining a quality article -- and not spreading false or misleading information about this woman. --Orlady (talk) 14:41, 9 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Katrina Kaif, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kabir Khan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 26 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Relationships in BLPs

Relationships come and go, and may not be so important in these BLPs. If in the article at all, they should be long-term, and confirmed by the parties in reliable sources. Be careful to avoid WP:BLPGOSSIP. Cheers, BollyJeff | talk 15:54, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Images in biographical articles

Please note that per WP:PERTINENCE, portrait photographs of the individual alone are recommended for biographical articles. --Ronz (talk) 02:07, 7 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (File:Sonam Kapoor at 92.7 BIG FM to promoto 'I Hate Luv Storys'.jpg)

Thanks for uploading File:Sonam Kapoor at 92.7 BIG FM to promoto 'I Hate Luv Storys'.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'file' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Hazard-Bot (talk) 04:34, 22 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diana Penty concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diana Penty, a page you created has not been edited in at least 180 days. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace. If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements. If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13. Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 18:33, 19 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

really?

given that there are currently at least 6 other open sections discussing her age and sourcing, was it really necessary to open yet another ? Can you go back and redact your comment and add them to one of the already existing discussions? -- TRPoD aka The Red Pen of Doom 20:58, 12 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm terribly sorry! I didn't realize that I had opened a new sction, I will go back and fix it right away. :) GrewalJ (talk) 12 October 2013.

Your article submission Diana Penty

Hello GrewalJ. It has been over six months since you last edited your article submission, entitled Diana Penty.

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Diana Penty}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 18:03, 23 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Kriti Sanon, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Blockbuster and Sukumar (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:51, 2 April 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:54, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, GrewalJ. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]