User talk:Gretagabaglio

December 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. The recent edit you made to Marco Piva has been reverted, as it appears to be unconstructive. Use the sandbox for testing; if you believe the edit was constructive, ensure that you provide an informative edit summary. You may also wish to read the introduction to editing. Thank you. Logan _Talk ^{Contributions} 16:31, 16 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited Marco Piva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Masterplan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for February 29

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Marco Piva, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roma (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:26, 29 February 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Studio Marco Piva moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Studio Marco Piva, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Itcouldbepossible^Talk 08:49, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:Studio Marco Piva has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:Studio Marco Piva. Thanks! Robert McClenon (talk) 16:42, 31 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Studio Marco Piva (February 21)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Evvekk was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

WP:REFBOMB issues have not been resolved.

•Notability not met per WP:CORP. What references have been checked are about the a project, and mention the studio only in passing. •Article content appears to be almost exactly the same as Marco Piva.

I do not believe this would survive AfD. Suggest merging this content with Marco Piva and turning this into a redirect to there.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Studio Marco Piva and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Studio Marco Piva, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Evvekk (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gretagabaglio! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Evvekk (talk) 15:24, 21 February 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Studio Marco Piva

Hello, Gretagabaglio. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Studio Marco Piva, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:03, 24 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Studio Marco Piva

Hello, Gretagabaglio. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Studio Marco Piva".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:58, 21 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]