User talk:Greier

nu stiu daca iti va folosi ce itzi voi zice:

formularea "in timpurile eleniste, macedonii au elenizat siria etc." e perfect ok. sa spui "in timpurile eleniste, nou elenizatii macedoni au elenizat siria" adauga informatie redundanta. macedonii sau elenizat intro masura sau alta, mai devreme sau mai tarziu, nu conteaza, ideea e ca macedonii au elenizat siria, nu elenii. nu ar tb satzi faci griji din punctu asta. mesajul care ramane este "macedonii au facut nushtiuce prin siria" ;) . bafta Criztu 20:46, 14 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

reelenizarea

explicami te rog ce vezi in neregula in acea sectiune, nu am putut identifica nimic in neregula acolo :|. formularea "In modern times, it is used in connection with governmental policies and exchanges among the linguistic and cultural minorities in Greece in relation to Aromanians, Megleno-Romanians" o vad ca fiind diplomatica. nu se specifica daca Aromanii au avut o cultura greaca si ca siar fi pierduto si acum siar regasi-o, ci spune ca reelenizarea este folosita cu referire la politica guvernului grec fata de Aromani. ca guvernu grec io considera pe aromani greci sau altele, asta nu se spune in articol, deci nu stiu la ce foloseste "needs citation" :|. sar putea sa nu inteleg io problema, kiar nu vad ce nu vezi tu in neregula acolo Criztu 14:44, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eu chiar nu vad cum si de ce mai ales (dupa toate chestiile alea cu surse si citate pe care le ziceai...) nu vezi tu nimic in neregula acolo... Probabil m-am inselat in privinta ta... Oricum, citeste asta... 14:49, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

te voi intreba, exista termenul "reelenizare" ? se foloseste termenul de reelenizare de catre guvernul grec ? exista surse care sa ateste acest termen ? daca ejti sigur ca nu exista documente care sa ateste acest fenomen de reelenizare, atunci reelenizarea nu exista. in cazul asta, poti cere surse in talk page, ceri surse care sa ateste termenul de reelenizare, pana cand cei care scriu de reelenizare in articolul "elenizare" se dau batuti :). Criztu 15:27, 15 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

da? bine... i-ti urez mult succes cu strategia asta... de`abia astept sa ajungi sa dai de o haita de utilizatori unguri care sa se comporte exact asa cum se comporta grecii... (de ex. [1], ps. Hectorian e tot grec: cum spuneam, Aromanii si Megleno-Romanii sunt greci ce trebuiesc rehelenizati, iar Romanii de care ne desparte doar granita sunt "vlahi"...) 18:06, 15 July 2006 (UTC)

Alt exemplu [2]...

Image tagging for Image:Coloniesinantiquity.JPG

Thanks for uploading Image:Coloniesinantiquity.JPG. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 08:54, 20 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:ConstantinPrezan.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:ConstantinPrezan.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:29, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Putna-wall.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Putna-wall.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 06:17, 23 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Margaritis calling

Hei Greier! Vezi User_talk:Dahn#Getae unde Aldux se agitǎ din nou. De mult am suspectat cǎ Aldux nu numai ca e mai tot timpul in cârdaşie cu grecii dar e de fapt..grec get beget! Cat despre Future Prefect e un filo-grec inversunat ca sa nu spun ca si pe el il cam adulmec ca fiind..grec. Vezi [cum mǎ cenzureazǎ] iesind in apararea grecilor si stergandu-mi afirmatiile. Ce pacat ca noi romanii si filo-romanii nu suntem uniti si ii lasam pe greci sa denatureze spiritul de neutralitate al wikipediei si deturnarea acesteia in folosul propagandei nationaliste grecesti. Ce parere ai? Grecotei ca Hectorian se dau drept aromani ceea ce e o insulta la memoria aromanilor care au luptat atat de mult pentru a-si afirma identitatea la adǎpost de salbatica politica de grecizare in urma careia au avut atat de mult de suferit Apostolos Margaritis 16:11, 25 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Grecii s-au supărat rău pe Mutu

vezi text

Grecii s-au supărat rău pe Mutu după ce românul i-a înşirat de vreo câteva ori pe gazon şi cu un minut înainte de pauză jucătorii celor două echipe au fost la un pas de o bătaie generală, totul pornind de la un fault suferit de Mutu. După pauză tot românul a fost atracţia zilei şi cu patru minute înainte de a fi schimbat a executat perfect o lovitură liberă de la 25 de metri, făcându-i pe cei 30.000 de fani să-i scandze numele îndelung când a fost înlocuit. Apostolos Margaritis 14:28, 30 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Transnistria

Mulţumesc pentru intervenţia pe pagina de discuţii a Transnistriei. M-am gîndit să cer o "arbitrare" în această problemă cu Mauco dar ar dura foarte mult, iar referendumul e mîine. Nici n-am experienţă cum e cu arbitrările astea, sînt relativ nou la Wikipedia. Mîine va fi în toate agenţiile de ştiri menţionată Transnistria şi mulţi vor căuta pe Wikipedia informaţii despre ea. Probabil se vor interesa de Transnistria în perioada asta mai mulţi decît într-un an întreg. De aia e important ca acum să existe informaţia corectă despre dubiile care le ridică incorectitudinea referendumului. Nu ştiu de cîte ori pe zi am voie să editez un articol. Deja am intervenit la Transnistria de 3 ori astăzi, nu ştiu dacă mai am voie. Ajută-mă şi tu la menţinerea informaţiei pe pagină, cînd Mauco o şterge pune-o la loc, că nu pot să stau cu ochii pe pagină 24 de ore din 24. După ce trece referendumul, poate voi apela şi la o arbitrare. Dacă ai experienţă în chestii din astea ajută-mă. Vezi deasemeni disputa cu Mauco la Union of Moldavians in Pridnestrovie (istorie şi pagină de discuţii).--MariusM 17:30, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR breach

Hello. You have been blocked for one week due to a 3RR breach. Please be more careful in the future. Thanks. El_C 19:06, 16 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Eşti pentru sau împotriva cenzurii?

Articolul Heaven of Transnistria a fost propus pentru ştergere. Dacă ţi-a expirat interdicţia dă-i şi tu votul. Apropo: mai încalcă şi alţii 3RR, dar scapă doar cu atenţionări: 21 septembrie şi 23 septembrie

Te duce capul la multe rele :)))) --Loganos 19:56, 28 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ar fi cazul să votezi

În talk page Transnistria, despre lincurile care trebuie adăugate. Comentariile tale sînt foarte bune, dar puţin cam lungi. Sfat prietenesc - concentrează-ţi ideile. N-ar strica să deschizi şi un capitol despre Wikipedia double standards, apropo de interdicţia de o săptămînă luată de tine pentru 3RR (într-o pagină de discuţii) şi lipsa interdicţiei în cazul Mauco (doar atenţionări, deşi a încălcat 3RR de 2 ori).

Vezi link

Vezi comentarii la articol: obraznicia lui Stavros si replica pe masura a romanilor

O Universitate latina in Wallachia anilor 1200?

vezi link

Titus Filipas scrie: Există un document foarte credibil că primul ‚visiting professor’ la o universitate din Romania (Dacia) a fost un anume Boetius, profesor de filosofie până la 1277 la Sorbonne. Unde să fi fost acea universitate din Romania (Dacia) anului 1277 ? Este plauzibil că Bram Stoker speculează tocmai acest mister când dezvăluie cititorilor săi un Curriculum al universităţii carpatine Scholomance din romanul "Dracula". Totuşi, nu cred că acea universitate din Dacia anului 1277, înfrăţită cu Universitatea Sorbonne, era şcoala de magie albă, magie neagră, Scholomance, zugrăvită de Bram Stoker. Pentru că în acea universitate din Romania (Dacia) anului 1277 începea să fie predat, odată cu venirea lui Boetius, averroismul latin, înseamnă că exista o privilegiere a raţionalismului. S-a aflat cumva la Castro Zeurini, oraşul ce s-a dezvoltat la Drobeta- Turnu Severin după 'Diploma cavalerilor ioaniţi" ? Cum trebuie să interpretăm oare masa aceea de documente în spiritul "averroismului latin" lăsate de Ştefan Odobleja în Arhivele de la Turnu Severin, scrise parcă „în transă”, dar logice şi într-o limbă perfectă, când în franceză, când în română? În averroismul latin, cunoaşterea sufletului nemuritor şi „intelectiv” era importantă. Îndrăznim să afirmăm că ‚Psihologia consonantistă’ a lui Ştefan Odobleja continuă, de facto, "averroismul latin".

Greiere? Ce parere ai?

Nu prea multe. Am citit tot articolul, si mi se pare ca autorul vorbeste despre cu totul altceva, de Eminescu, Bram Stoker, Toma din Aquino, etc, despre tot in afara de "universitatea din Dacia". Există un document foarte credibil că primul ‚visiting professor’ la o universitate din Romania (Dacia).... Care document? Unde e documentul??? Subliniem, acea universitate din Romania (Dacia), acreditată internaţional şi de ‚senatul’ de la Sorbonne... Dovezi??? Nu vreau sa par revizionist (e la moda acum: vezi Dahn sau Adrian Cioroianu), dar ma indoiesc ca a existat acea "universitate". Autorul repeta "...Romania (Dacia)...": ori e Romania, ori e Dacia. Ce nume apare in acel document despre care se vorbeste: Romania sau Dacia? Daca e "Romania", de unde stie ca nu se refera la Imp. Bizantin? (Ρωμανία - nume de la care turcii au facut Rumelia). Si daca e "Dacia" care Dacie? La nord sau la sud de Dunare? Sau sa fie Danemarca, numita in evul mediu Dacia? Articolul face referire la un anume Boethius. Cum nu a reusit sa ma lamureasca cine e Boethius ala, ma intreb: e Boetius of Dacia??? Cum de in cronicile romanesti, grecesti sau unguresti nu apre mentionata acea universitate, macar ca legenda? Dar in acelasi timp admit ca exista o posibilitate. Anul, 1277, permite existenta acelei univ. Articolul mai mentioneaza (irelevant, dar in fine...) si conciliul de la Lyon: stiu ca intre partile prezente se numare si asa zisul "realm of Dacia" - o legatura??? Nu stiu ce sa spun, pentru ca pur si simplu nu am despre ce sa spun: titlul e "Universitatea din Dacia", dar continutul e cu totul altceva. Poate mai apar articole despre subiect. Ar fi interesant. Greier 18:32, 17 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jamason şi Mauco

Salut Greiere,

Am văzut că-l consideri pe Jamason sockpuppet a lui Mauco. Nu cred că e cazul. Am luat legătura cu Jamason şi mi-a trimis o teză a sa despre Transnistria pe care a susţinut-o la o Universitate Americană. Teza e pro-rusească, dar existenţa ei arată că omul într-adevăr a studiat problema şi pare să fie o persoană reală din mediul universitar american. I-am trimis observaţii despre teză, a promis omul că învaţă româneşte ca să priceapă problemele mai bine. Dispariţia lui Mauco cred că are legătură cu Request for Mediation pe care l-am cerut la Transnistrian referendum, 2006 sau cu investigaţiile lui Edward Lucas.--MariusM 20:44, 18 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Ahh, ok Marius, mersi pt. informatii. Greier 07:57, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

3RR notice

Please refrain from undoing other people's edits repeatedly. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia under the three-revert rule, which states that nobody may revert a single page more than three times in 24 hours. (Note: this also means editing the page to reinsert an old edit. If the effect of your actions is to revert back, it qualifies as a revert.) Thank you. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 15:42, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I`ve received a 3RR warning from you. What is that all about? Greier 15:46, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Yikes! I am so sorry. I am so very sorry. — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 15:48, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

That is the third warning he received this month. What`s next? Beg him not to break 3RR? Expecting answer. Greier 15:54, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well, I am no expert in this particular article. And if he keeps himself from breaching 3RR, what are we policy wonks going to do? Regards, — Nearly Headless Nick ^{L} 15:58, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut Greiere--202.44.8.100 16:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Salut! :D Greier 17:15, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Greier, there is no consensus for your recent edits to Transnistria. We have opened a thread on this in Talk:Transnistria, and your participation in the discussion is requested. - Mauco 18:02, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mie de ce nu imi scrii email Greiere? --162.114.211.139 18:47, 21 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Dar in primul rand cine esti? :) Si am mai scris cuiva email, ca sa fii suparat? Ce adresa de email ai? Greier 08:56, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

:)De la Bon :) De sa fii suparat pe mine? Ai adresa mea de email, ti-am dat cu send email din meniul din stanga si sper ca ai si primit :) toate bune,

de la Bon

TiraspolTimes _______________________________________________________________________________________________________________________

Requests regarding external orgs should made directly.

MarkStreet Oct

Hi Greier,did you see the sources provided about the battle of Rovine article (talk page)..? Any comments..? Lysandros 19:14, 1 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Văd că s-a făcut raport 3RR contra ta [3] - e bine să te aperi.

Hi Greier, Mersi pentru mesaj. Vezi raspunsul meu aici. Sper sa inteleaga si sa nu se supere. El e blocat si pe ro sau care e problema? Sa-si faca cont pe wikipedia chineza! Daca alti utilizatori isi "coordoneaza" activitatea prin email, eu prefer sa nu fac asta. Sper sa intelegeti. Pur si simplu, atata timp cat nu cunosc persoana direct... Daca fac exceptie o data, o sa fac de 100 de ori, si la urma sigur o sa-mi para foarte rau. In fine, sper sa nu te pun pe tine "intre ciocan si nicovala" :) :Dc76 19:42, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for 2 weeks

You have been temporarily blocked for violation of the three-revert rule. Please feel free to return after the block expires, but also please make an effort to discuss your changes further in the future.

This relates to Greeks of Romania. Bearing in mind that you have been blocked for 3RR 8 times before, you really need to start keeping it in mind. Stifle (talk) 14:04, 4 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

I don't know who this was directed towards, but personal attacks will not be tolerated. The next time it happens, you will be blocked. Khoi khoi 18:32, 19 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And because of this, I've blocked you for 48 hours. Khoi khoi 19:22, 24 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Lautari

first of all I`m not khoi and second did you even read anything in the article or discussion before reverting to an article that has half the amount of information and some misleading?... I agree with you on the fact that lautari is a romanian word that means folk musician(he could even be chinese)... but you must understand that the same word is used by the roma themselves and the rest of the world to distinguish a roma clan inside of romania whose occupation is traditionaly being a folk musician... you must respect this second definition and cannot pretend that this second definition doesnt exist .... if you are denying the fact of a roma clan called lautari then you might be a racist...???

I think this user is blocked for 24 hours or something. There are 100 ways around your problem, here is just one of them: Create two articles Lăutari (musician) and Lăutari (Roma clan). How's that? By the way, is the spelling of the second Lăutari or Lautari? :Dc76 05:22, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Two dilettantes arguing... Wikipedia... Greier 10:40, 25 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

Greier, îţi apreciez sprijinul. Mulţumesc frumos. Biruitorul 20:43, 28 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

[4]. You should revert yourself.--195.122.194.210 22:07, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

blocked for 3RR Lăutari

I've blocked you for personal attacks and incility on the article. Since you have a history of these problems the block is 1 week. JoshuaZ 22:13, 29 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

This block has been extended to indefinite. Please see Wikipedia:Administrators'_noticeboard/Incidents#Greier. Dmcdevit·t 11:02, 4 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I hope your happy now!! Romaniroma 16:28, 30 November 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I saw that Greier's block of one week was extended to forever bann. However, in 29 November Greier didn't break the 3RR on Lăutari, he made only 2 reverts. He didn't deserve the block in 29 November, which was the argument for his banning afterwards.--MariusM 00:08, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Reversals

To anyone who is cleaning up after Greier and has had run-ins with the disruptive user in the past: His disruptive edits should be reversed and restored to pre-Greier versions. Editors such as Greier who have been banned or blocked from Wikipedia in general may also be reverted without the reverts counting towards 3RR limits.

Any edits made in defiance of a ban may be reverted to enforce the ban, regardless of the merits of the edits themselves. As the banned user is not authorised to make those edits, there is no need to discuss them prior to reversion.

To Greier's friends and fellow POV-pushers, we must remind that that official Wikipedia policy states that users are expected to refrain from reinstating any edits made by banned users. Users that nonetheless reinstate such edits take responsibility for their content by so doing, which in this case means that the block or ban may be extended to cover them as well. For more on this policy, see WP:BAN. - Mauco 16:53, 8 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Mauco, you again didn't understand Wikipedia policy or knowingly make wrong comments about it. A banned user can edit after the ban evading the ban (like Bonny is doing sometimes). Greier was blocked after a fake 3RR report (he made 5 reverts in 10 days, didn't broke 3RR) and the block was extended to a ban, but this is an other discussion. Yes, I take responsability for reinstating Greier's edit done before the ban, is my right as a Wikipedia user. When you take out the paragraph you don't revert Greier, you revert me, and this is counting for 3RR. If you don't trust me, just try.--MariusM 17:45, 18 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Use of open proxy

See this edit [5]

Yes, I see it... Greier 20:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

121.131.155.98 is listed as an open proxy at http://proxy.blogspot.com--A. B. ^(talk) 07:08, 15 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

And? Greier 20:57, 20 December 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with Image:Aromn.JPG

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading Image:Aromn.JPG. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Shell ^babelfish 00:51, 11 October 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:User Vlachophile

A tag has been placed on Template:User Vlachophile requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 19:39, 20 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Thraco-Roman

An article that you have been involved in editing, Thraco-Roman, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Thraco-Roman. Thank you. Do you want to opt out of receiving this notice? Bluehunt (talk) 13:28, 18 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: Image:Tomb-hunyadi.jpg

Image:Tomb-hunyadi.jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:Image:Tomb of John Hunyadi.jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[Image:Tomb of John Hunyadi.jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:06, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image:John Hunyadi -Johannes de Thurocz- Chronica Hungarorum, Brno 1488.jpg is now available as Commons:Image:John Hunyadi - Johannes de Thurocz - Chronica Hungarorum, Brno 1488.jpg. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 23:07, 12 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Simeon-sava-curteadearges-romania.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Simeon-sava-curteadearges-romania.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:32, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Roxanda-curteadearges-romania.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Roxanda-curteadearges-romania.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Chrysobull-StefanitaLupu.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chrysobull-StefanitaLupu.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:33, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Chrysobull-ScarlatGhica.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Chrysobull-ScarlatGhica.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:34, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Letter-dionysioumonastery.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Letter-dionysioumonastery.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:35, 8 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dacia

Hi, I saw that you collaborated on articles related to Dacia and thought this could be of interest: WikiProject Dacia is looking for supporters, editors and collaborators for creating and better organizing information in articles related to Dacia and the history of Daco-Getae. If interested, PLEASE provide your support on the proposal page. Thanks!!--Codrinb (talk) 03:32, 11 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Mironcostin.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Mironcostin.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 04:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Magog the Ogre (talk) 04:24, 10 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:LesAroumains.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:LesAroumains.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 01:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. — ξ ^xplicit 01:26, 11 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:PavelChinezul.jpg needs authorship information

Dear uploader:

The media file you uploaded as File:PavelChinezul.jpg appears to be missing information as to its authorship (and or source), or if you did provide such information, it is confusing for others trying to make use of the image.

It would be appreciated if you would consider updating the file description page, to make the authorship of the media clearer.

Although some images may not need author information in obvious cases, (such where an applicable source is provided), authorship information aids users of the image, and helps ensure that appropriate credit is given (a requirement of some licenses).

If you created this media yourself, please consider explicitly including your user name, for which: {{subst:usernameexpand|Greier}} will produce an appropriate expansion,
or use the {{own}} template.

If this is an old image, for which the authorship is unknown or impossible to determine, please indicate this on the file description page.

If you have any questions please see Help:File page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:PavelChinezul.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:PavelChinezul.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 20:02, 30 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Keyrouz credo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Keyrouz credo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:28, 17 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ion caian.jpg

The file File:Ion caian.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 15 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Papahagit2.jpg

The file File:Papahagit2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 5 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File:Trajan-denarius.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Trajan-denarius.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:17, 27 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]