User talk:Gregory Richters

Hi, Greg! When it comes to biographies of living people, the subject has to meet an extremely high threshold of notability outlined at WP:BOLP. If she meets the criteria, then yes, she's good to go for an article. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 23:27, 2 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You may also click on the signature button located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 00:59, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Spa

What you can do is provide a source for this development of health resorts. Without claiming this company "coined" the word spa, which has been in use for centuries - and does *not* derive from any acronym. Read the page before editing it? -- Ian Dalziel (talk) 01:19, 3 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Re. your subject

If you can post those citations, then you should be good to go. Problem as it stands right now is the very promotional tone of the article. What I'll go ahead and do for you is to create a user subpage with the most recent revision. You can work on it at your leisure and paste the content back to the article space when it's ready:

User:Gregory Richters/Roxana Molinari

You'll find the original text in the above link. Good luck and feel free to ask questions. :) --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:35, 4 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Emily Lazarus

A tag has been placed on Emily Lazarus, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the guidelines on spam as well as Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information. You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles - see the Article Wizard.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the page does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that they userfy the page or have a copy emailed to you. andy (talk) 11:35, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]

April 2010

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to Spa. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. andy (talk) 13:13, 5 April 2010 (UTC)[reply]