User talk:Gregory Dziedzic

May 2010

Welcome to Wikipedia. If you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about in the article Hydrogen economy, you may have a conflict of interest. In keeping with Wikipedia's neutral point of view policy, edits where there is a conflict of interest, or where such a conflict might reasonably be inferred, are strongly discouraged. If you have a conflict of interest, you should avoid or exercise great caution when:

editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with;
participating in deletion discussions about articles related to your organization or its competitors; and
linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. Thank you. As you claim to work for the International Centre for Hydrogen Energy Technologies, adding links to http://www.unido-ichet.org/ is a conflict of interest. Please check the guidelines before adding any further changes of this type. Fæ (talk) 12:06, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Gregory Dziedzic. You have new messages at Fæ's talk page.
Message added 12:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Fæ (talk) 12:42, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, as well as making a comment on the article talk page, I suggest you join WP:WikiProject Energy and make a request on the project talk page that your link be added by someone else to the article. The talk page may take months for anyone to take up a comment while the project page is likely to be a bit more active. Fæ (talk) 14:50, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Young Shaven (November 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by PerfectSoundWhatever were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Remove citations to unreliable sources (e.g. Discogs). Significant coverage in multiple, reliable sources isn't demonstrated.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Young Shaven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 02:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Gregory Dziedzic! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! — PerfectSoundWhatever (t; c) 02:57, 5 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:The Young Shaven

Hello, Gregory Dziedzic. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "The Young Shaven".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. ✗plicit 14:41, 6 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: The Young Shaven (October 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by AlphaBetaGamma was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:The Young Shaven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

ABG (Talk/Report any mistakes here) 09:32, 8 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]