User talk:Greggman

Image Tagging for Image:Tume.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Tume.png. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:08, 20 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Greggman, when you said you made this image, did you draw the environment or just take the screenshot? We would need permission of the environment artist to license the photo under the current license. You/they can send permission by official email (for posterity) by following the directions here: email verification of author permission (OTRS). czar 18:13, 10 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tume.png listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tume.png, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. czar 22:58, 16 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TUME

The article TUME has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article topic lacks significant coverage from reliable, independent sources (?) or at least enough to build a full article. Only passing mentions in the video game reliable sources custom Google search, Google Books, and regular searches. (Also was started by user affiliated with the project a decade ago.) No suitable merge/redirect targets.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. czar 15:50, 5 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

What is the common misconception referred to in the article on Gouraud shading?

The section here https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Gouraud_shading#Common_misconception explains how Gouraud shading is different from perspective correct shading. The title of the section suggests that there is some misconception about how Gouraud shading works or what it is. It is not clear what the misconception is, however. Perhaps is the misconception that people believe that Gouraud shading is perspective correct? If that is the case, could you make that more clear? — Preceding unsigned comment added by Prof dr finkelstein (talk • contribs) 15:50, 5 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Common sense test

Your lack of common sense is ruining Wikipedia 45.64.241.197 (talk) 10:17, 21 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]