User talk:GregersMoller

There have been two problems with this account: the account has been used for advertising or promotion, which is contrary to the purpose of Wikipedia, and your username indicates that the account represents a business or other organisation or group, which is also against policy, as an account must be for just one person. Because of those problems, the account has been blocked indefinitely from editing.

If you intend to make useful contributions about some topic other than your business or organisation, you may request an unblock. To do so, post the text {{unblock-spamun|Your proposed new username|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page. Replace the text "Your proposed new username" with a new username you are willing to use. See Special:CentralAuth to search for available usernames. Your new username will need to meet our username policy. Replace the text "Your reason here" with your reason to be unblocked. In that reason, you must:

Convince us that you understand the reason for your block and that you will not repeat the kind of edits for which you were blocked.
Describe in general terms the contributions that you intend to make if you are unblocked.

If you believe this block was made in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} at the bottom of your talk page, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Alexf^(talk) 11:23, 18 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Requesting to be unblocked

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without a good reason (see the blocking policy). Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

GregersMoller (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

GregersMoller (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I understand the reason for being blocked. My username in combination with the subject may suggest I am advertising the naturist association in Thailand and the current naturist resorts in Thailand.

I still believe, the outdated information on naturism in Thailand should be updated. I believe it would be best if it was done by me since I am the ultimate factual source on this topic. Excample: Few other people know the number of members of the national naturist association. Or the fact that a naturist club was established in 1931 in Thailand. To avoid any conflict with the publishing guidelines, I suggest that I - as User:GregersMoller - in my update of the page by the end do not mention names of any resort names (include deleting the names of the two businesses named in the current post) but just state the fact that as of October 2017 there are five current naturist resorts in Thailand.

I am also an expert on the topic of the Scandinavian diaspora in South East Asia. I plan to write on this topic as well if I am unblocked.

Thanks.

Decline reason:

The username issue is resolved, but I don't think it would be best if you continued to edit that topic due to your obvious conflict of interest. Wikipedia does not accept original research, so we cannot accept you as the ultimate factual source. Huon (talk) 14:35, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I've done the rename (from User:ThailandNaturist), and someone else will review your unblock request. Boing! said Zebedee (talk) 13:22, 19 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]