User talk:Greg Cesear

This is Greg Cesear's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: sandbox (December 8)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to User:Greg Cesear/sandbox and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Greg Cesear! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:25, 8 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]

January 2024

Hello Greg Cesear! Your additions to Draft:Wenceslas Square play have been removed in whole or in part, as they appear to have added copyrighted content without evidence that the source material is in the public domain or has been released by its owner or legal agent under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. (To request such a release, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission.) While we appreciate your contributions to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from sources to avoid copyright and plagiarism issues.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify the information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
We have strict guidelines on the usage of copyrighted images. Fair use images must meet all ten of the non-free content criteria in order to be used in articles, or they will be deleted. To be used on Wikipedia, all other images must be made available under a free and open copyright license that allows commercial and derivative reuse.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a legally designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. Understand, though, that unlike many other sites, where a person can license their content for use there and retain non-free ownership, that is not possible at Wikipedia. Rather, the release of content must be irrevocable, to the world, into either the public domain (PD) or under a suitably free and compatible copyright license. Please see Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you must follow the copyright attribution steps described at Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia. See also Help:Translation#License requirements.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, please ask them here on this page, or leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv123 (talk) 07:18, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, I'm Bennv123. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Wenceslas Square (play), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Bennv123 (talk) 15:29, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Wenceslas Square (play) has been accepted

Wenceslas Square (play), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Bennv123 (talk) 07:40, 26 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: When the World was Green (a Chef’s Fable) (February 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by MicrobiologyMarcus was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Likely notable but the Themes section is not written in encyclopedic prose. Stick to writing the facts as present by the secondary sources, we aren't here to write an essay.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:When the World was Green (a Chef’s Fable) and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

microbiologyMarcus ^{(petri dish·growths)} 19:49, 19 February 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: When the World was Green (a Chef’s Fable) has been accepted

When the World was Green (a Chef’s Fable), which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 16:18, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Draft:Greg Cesear

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Draft:Greg Cesear, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It appears to be an unambiguous copyright infringement. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images taken from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites or other printed material as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website or image belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text or image — which means allowing other people to use it for any reason — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. The same holds if you are not the owner but have their permission. If you are not the owner and do not have permission, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for how you may obtain it. You might want to look at Wikipedia's copyright policy for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. microbiologyMarcus ^{[petri dish·growths]} 16:24, 5 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Improvisation or the Shepherd's Chameleon, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

please choose one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 16:26, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Improvisation or the Shepherd's Chameleon (May 7)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by ToadetteEdit was:

This appears to be a duplicate of another submission, Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon, which is also waiting to be reviewed. To save time we will consider the other submission and not this one.

The comment the reviewer left was:

You should choose one.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Improvisation or the Shepherd's Chameleon and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Toadette^Edit! 16:27, 7 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding User:Greg Cesear/sandbox

Hello, Greg Cesear. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that User:Greg Cesear/sandbox, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:06, 9 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Improvisation or the Shepherd's Chameleon has been accepted

Improvisation or the Shepherd's Chameleon, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Atlantic306 (talk) 20:32, 14 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern over many of this user's contributions.

This user's contributions, primarily in the category of theatrical productions, seem to reflect a troubling pattern of self-promotion. Having reviewed a large number of articles that were edited by Greg Cesear, I am lead to believe they are attempting to exploit Wikipedia for primarily marketing purposes, or otherwise in an effort to elevate their own status and reputation with little or no practical utility for Wikipedia's broader goals.

I first noticed this in the article for the 1983 play Pack of Lies, where they edited the Productions section to include a performance by the Cleveland-based theatre company "Cesear's Forum"^[1], for which they were the director^[2]. Similar edits^[3], adding their own theatre troupe's performances despite them not featuring any particularly notable events or cast members, with references to their local newspaper or periodicals either announcing or reviewing the shows.

I'm not suggesting that theatrical productions that are not necessarily mainstream Broadway, West End, et al, should be excluded from Wikipedia articles, but the additions of these independent or community productions should follow the same basic standards for Wikipedia in that they should be considered against their significance to the history of the article's featured topic, and should be submitted by a less obviously biased individual who was not directly involved, or otherwise compromised by clear conflicts of interest.

I have not yet begun to edit any of the pages in question, and would like this to be considered by a wider group of Wikipedians before suggesting that any of this user's content be removed. I am writing this on the user's own Talk page first to give them an opportunity to respond. It should be noted that there are also valid and compliant contributions that they have provided, and while they may deserve additional scrutiny considering the author's other activities, frequently engaged in parallel to some of the more acceptable work, but I recognize that their questionable edits do not necessarily represent the entirety of their input.

___
Disclaimer: I have no affiliation with the user, any of the relevant articles or their subjects, or any other person, place, organization, or common endeavors on or off of Wikipedia. I am simply a supporter of Wikipedia and its mission, and during the course of routine browsing, found something that concerned me.

Thanks to whomever might be listening

SilverXnoise (talk) 21:46, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, User:Greg Cesear/sandbox

Hello, Greg Cesear. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "sandbox".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:17, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Wemceslas square play

Hello, Greg Cesear. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Wemceslas square play, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 04:06, 27 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Wemceslas square play

Hello, Greg Cesear. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Wemceslas square play".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:05, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon

Hello, Greg Cesear. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 12:10, 28 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon

Hello, Greg Cesear. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, "Improvisation of the Shepherd's Chameleon".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 17:31, 7 November 2024 (UTC)[reply]

[1] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?diff=1192444927&oldid=1191936875&title=Pack_of_Lies&useskin=vector

[2] ttps://www.clevescene.com/arts/capsule-reviews-of-current-area-theater-presentations-1496948

[3] ttps://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Special:Contributions/Greg_Cesear?useskin=vector

[1]

[2]

[3]