User talk:GregAsche/Archive2

Shihan Gordan Doversola

The article is part of an article from Black Belt Magazine March 1965 to which he has rights to reproduce. The webite does not.

userpage vandalism

Thanks for reverting that userpage vandalism; I guess that anon isn't too happy with me :). --Spangineer^es (háblame) 03:26, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Anon. would be much happier if the page on Elizabeth Morgan reflected fact. It contains inaccuracies and considerable amounts of bias. She was not sent to prison for two years; she was sent to the District of Columbia jail for 22 months. She and Foretich met at Fairfax Hospital in Virginia. He was still married at the time and had lied to her about being divorced. Your page includes several citations that support Foretich's viewpoint and few if any supporting Elizabeth. This makes it slanted and incorrect. If you want to be seen as an authoritative source you need to correct these.

CBW RfA

Just a quick word of thanks for your vote. If you have any concerns over my actions please let me know. CambridgeBayWeather 23:28, 23 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks and Congrats

Thanks for reverting Supertroll vandalising my user page last night and the barnstar and also congrats on your adminship knew I made a good choice --JAranda | watz sup 00:39, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thank you very much for you know what. ;) --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 01:52, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Hey greg. I noticed you changed your vote. Can I just get some thoughts on your reasoning so I can help myself become better? What particularly unsettles you? Thank you, a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:13, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I really haven't made any anti-Indian editing, you can check that if you want. As for pro-Islamic, I work a lot on Islamic articles, but I mostly revert vandalism and discuss minor edits. --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 21:21, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congratulations!

I'm pleased to inform you that you are now an administrator. Please consider reading all the material on the administrators' reading list before testing out your new privileges. Though everything you do, excluding image deletions and page history merges, is reversible, you should nevertheless be very careful with your sysop capabilities. For instructions, please see the administrators' how-to guide. Good luck! — Dan | Talk 02:17, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats! Good to see you with the mop. Owen× ☎ 02:49, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I would also like to congratulate you. Congratulations! --a.n.o.n.y.m ^t 03:43, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Cngrats also Dlyons493 Talk 03:55, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Congrats, and thanks for reverting the vandalism on my user page! --JoanneB 07:56, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Maryville Middle School

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Maryville Middle School appears in danger of being trumped by a conspicuous and concerted effort on the part of deletionists. Please review the nomination and vote at your convenience.--Nicodemus75 05:34, 24 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RP article

I was not adding racist comments to the article, that was user:Nivik77, I've been try to revert vandalism. --Fallout boy 03:05, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

the wub's RfA

Thanks a lot for your support on my RfA, I really appreciate it. Congratulations on your success as well. Let's go whack some vandals! the wub "?!" 12:47, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Titoxd's RfA

Thank you for supporting me in my RfA. I never thought I would get so much support! Thanks to your help, my nomination was the 10th most supported RfA in Wikipedia history. Now, please keep an eye out on me while I learn the new tools (and thanks for the script!), ok? Thanks again! Tito xd^(?!?) 17:17, 25 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Can you give me a hand?

You're an admin, so i have a question, if you know the answer. Can users be deleted on Wikipedia? A few months ago i placed a "test" warning on 24.84.36.230's user page, and i set myself to watch them. Yet, when i went back today to check if they had vandalized again, they had no contributions? Is this my mistake, or can people's accounts be deleted? Thanks! --Quadraxis 01:58, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, thanks very much! --Quadraxis 02:01, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Oh, i forgot, the article that person vandalized was pretty insignificant, so that makes sense. Thanks again! --Quadraxis 02:02, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay pubs in Leeds

I need a sysop and I see that you are probably near your computer now. Can you put this AfD out of its misery for me. cheers Youngamerican 02:50, 26 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks for reverting the vandalism at my user space. I don't know why this dude started picking on me, but hey, let the vandals waste their time. Thanks again! :) Tito xd^(?!?) 20:26, 27 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

WTF

Will some one please f**** help me add a photo to an article. Couldnt the creator of this site make it a lot easier, why does it ahve to be in all this gay code and shit

PHOTOS

ya thats fu*** great, but how the fu** do i put the photo in the article i want. explain that one

Counter Vandalism Unit Elections!

Just a reminder: If you haven't already done so, you have until November 1st (00:00 UTC) to vote in the Counter Vandalism Unit Elections! Fir e Fo x 18:55, 28 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Minor oops...

Could you, perchance, use your newfound superpowers to undo my ill-thought out move of Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links to Wikipedia talk:Disambiguation pages with links/archive 01 - I was trying to keep the original history in the archived version. Didn't work out. Cheers! BD2412 ^talk 03:04, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - there ought to be an "archive" function! BD2412 ^talk 03:15, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Nah, I've already put two much work into balancing two archive pages. Next time, tho! ;-) BD2412 ^talk 03:30, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Could you help with the article of the legal term "fair comment"?

I noticed that you are interested in law. Well quite some time aga I started an article called "fair comment". I must confess it was a way for me to get the fact out that "fair comment" is actually a legal term. This is now an established fact. However the article itself did not fare so well in the process. I was accused of mischaracterising the actual meaning of "fair comment" and the article was ... "modified"... While this in itself is not such a bad thing I have checked the newest version of the article and found some logical errors. In a long post I pointed out that I did not mischaracterised the meaning of "fair comment" and that there are logical inconsistancies in the last paragraph of the newest version...

I have however not edited the article since I started the original version and following the politicaly charged climate i do not intend to do so in the future.

Would you therefore please review my observations and conclusions?

For the sake of the article especially the logical errors are important, you can find my views about them under the following headline on the article talkpage:

1.6 "Following this sentance by sentance analysis I make these observations" and there observation number 3.

Most of the post is just to show that I did not mischaracterised the meaning of "fair comment".

Thank you in advance --Zirkon 12:05, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you for your support! If you should ever have any concerns about my actions as an administrator, please be sure to tell me! Kirill Lokshin 13:23, 29 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User 82.182.82.20

re: Admin intervention against vandalism

You said you didn't see anything in the past day that was vandalism, I offer you some glasses ;) http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Microsoft&diff=26847893&oldid=26803491 Paul Cyr 06:44, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Monobook.js

Hey, in case you didn't notice it in your watchlist, I replied on my talk page. But I think I fixed the problem. Make sure you hit shift-refresh, and I dont think it works in IE, although I could probably get it too if I weren't lazy :) Let me know. «»Who ?¿?^meta 22:42, 30 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:210.8.54.35

[[2]] seems to be a school shared IP, and their last contribution was a revert of their own vandalism, so why block them for a month instead of giving them the benefit of the doubt? School users are our future contributors, even if they vandalize sometimes now. :-) --Unforgettableid | Talk to me 05:33, 31 October 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Marren

Just so you know, that anon editor who you scolded for blanking the Marren and Brian Marren articles? He was right. They were worthless garbage; very ornate hoaxes. I'm in the middle of cleaning up all the damage. DS 02:02, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

User:210.55.249.78

You banned this user temporarily User_talk:210.55.249.78 yesterday. Vandalism resumed today. See contribs to Gisborne article. --jnothman ^talk 05:05, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Brandt

Since it was unprotected thepage has been blanked 5 times in an hour. Brandt has askedon his wikipedia watch site "Who will rid me of this meddlesome article?" [3].

As a result, he and his freinds are vandalising it systematically. What to do? Please respont on talk page

jucifer 22:49, 1 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Note about category markup

Hi Greg, I just thought I'd drop you a note after browsing your userpage. If you add a colon immediately after the first set of double brackets for a category, it acts as a link to that category page and does not place the page into the category. For example, [[:Category:Stubs]] results in Category:Stubs. These may be piped as normal, such as Stubs. Cheers, Banyan Tree 01:16, 5 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Vandalism

Thanks for the quick revert on my page. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:33, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Re Blocks

Right now you just placed plenty of blocks on AOL ips and I need them unblocked cause I cant edit. Could u unblock them please. 205.188.116.72 is a example Thanks --JAranda | watz sup 02:35, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Just curious, Aranda, but if the AOL IP blocks are affecting you, how come you're able to edit this page? Are the blocks just affecting specific pages, where the IP stays the same? Thanks. Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:38, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Someone using AOL and apparently IPs very similar to yours just went on a spree of user / user talk page vandalism. They used a different IP each time, and I blocked them all for 15 minutes. If there is a specific one that affects you, I will unblock it. :) (copy pasting from Aranda's talk page so we can follow this.) -Greg Asche (talk) 02:37, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

(oops, I copied and pasted my comment to Aranda56's talk page as well) :-) Flcelloguy | A note? | Desk | W_S 02:40, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Yep an AOL Ip Just attacked me saying that i like COMMUNIST PENIS thanks for the revert --JAranda | watz sup 02:48, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

I need all those AOL Ip numbers unblocked as OwenX re blocked them for 48 hours, and a few other admins are ignoring me and I cant do important edits. Thanks --JAranda | watz sup 04:26, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Communist Penis!

Hey, just wanted to thank you for catching that vandalism to my user talk page. Damn AOL! :)--Sean|Bla ck 02:56, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Talk page Vandalism

Thanks for reverting vandalism on my time page. Please accept my personal award, the Psi. I bestow it to polite, courteous, and helpful users. It is to be used in good mental health or to fight wiki-stress. Take care. -- Psy guy ^(talk) 03:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Grapes

Epirus

I've added a pov tag to avoid revert wars, and it got removed. Do whatever you might find apropriate. Thanks. +MATIA ☎ 14:50, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks from Pamri

Hi Greg, Thanks a ton for your constructive comments and for voting at my RFA. I am now a wikipedia administrator. I hope I can keep your trust and hopefully, we should interact more in the future. Thanks again. --Pamri ^{• Talk • Reply} 16:25, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

RfA thanks

Thank-you for expressing your confidence in me at my recent Request for Adminship. The final result was 40/0/0, and my "superpowers" have now been activated. I look forward to helping out with the development of the encyclopedia. Physchim62 (talk · contribs)

Johann Wolfgang's RfA

Thank you for your support on my RfA. I will use my new abilities with the common interest in mind. If you have any questions please feel free to contact me.

Johann Wolfgang [ T ...C ] 03:22, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the revert on my user talk page

Thank you for reverting the vandalism to my talk page. I just want to know how that Anon IP figured out the dark secret I've been hiding all these years... ROFL!--Isotope23 14:29, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Janice Rogers Brown

Why did you eliminate the copy-vio notice? Did I do something wrong? 128.146.26.116 22:15, 7 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RFA

Thank you very much for supporting my rather contentious request for adminship, but now that I've been promoted, I'd like to do a little dance here *DANCES*. If you have any specific issues/problems with me, please feel free to state them on my talk page so that I can work to prevent them in the future, and thanks once again! ALKIVAR™ 07:56, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

wikipedia-watch

Hi,

I'm leaving this message on the page of all the users mentioned by Brandt on this new page of his wikipeida-watch site. As you can see from the link, he's put together a list of the Wikipedia users that he sees as his enemies, and is trying to collect as much personal information as he can about each of them. Just thought I should let you know. Canderson7 12:33, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fir e Fo x RFA

GregAsche/Archive2

Thanks for your support on my request for adminship.

The final outcome was (96/2/0), so I am now an administrator. If you ever have any queries about my actions, please do not hesitate to contact me. Again, thanks!

Fir e Fo x 18:19, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

My RfA

I just wanted to leave a quick note thanking you for supporting me on my successful RfA. — Phil Welch 21:58, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Vandalism"

I am not vandalizing. I am removing irrelevant information. Thank you. 24.129.32.5 03:07, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for understanding -- I think someone has decided to turn the school's page into an engineering department hall of fame! 24.129.32.5 03:18, 9 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

"Anthony Christian Copyright"

I'm a little confused about the copyright process but i think i have resolved the problem. I have placed a GNU Free Documentation Liscense at the bottom of http://www.anthonychristian.co.uk/about.html . Is that everything i need to do? Mike Hannon

Epirus Protected

Copied from Talk:Epirus#Protected:
Since a couple anons keep removing the NPOV tag, I've protected this article. -Greg Asche (talk) 18:37, 6 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your concern, but could you please revert the article to its pre-vandalised version? The current version is full of the anonymous user's untruths and nationalist propaganda.--Theathenae 13:02, 8 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

If you're about

~~... and have time to check User:MDFN - conts (at the moment quite small), I'd be grateful. Alf ^melmac 00:44, 10 November 2005 (UTC)~~[reply]

RoyBoy's taken care of it, no worries. Alf ^melmac 00:46, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

a speedy needed

An anon IP made a disambig page at Jack Whittaker, since there is a Canadian MP with the name in addition to the lottery winner. They, however, did a cut and paste move to Jack Whittaker (Virginian) for the lottery guy. This was an incorrect way to move the article, obviously, and is innaccurate, considering he is from West Virginia. I worked with the article and moved it in a proper manner to Jack Whittaker (lottery winner) and corrected the disambig. I believe the Jack Whittaker (Virginian) article meets the requirements for speedy, since it is a duplicate of an article in an accurate namespace, has no edit history, and is not linked to. Thanks for your help. Youngamerican 03:43, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Nevermind. Another admin got it. Cheers. Youngamerican 03:48, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]
- Sorry to always bug you when I need a sysop in a hurry. I usually check the recent contribs until I see a name that I know to be an admin. Then I bug them (well, usually you) to do the mopping. Anyways, thanks and keep up the good work. Youngamerican 03:57, 10 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Adminship nomination

I'm back from my trip. If you still consider me worthy, I'd appreciate a nomination. :-) --Nlu 03:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! --Nlu 23:18, 11 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Psy guy's RfA

Thanks for supporting my RfA. It recently closed with final tally of 51/1/2. I sincerely appreciate it and I hope I can live up to your expectations. I will try my best to be a good administrator. If you ever need anything, just let me know. Thanks! -- Psy guy ^(talk) 05:32, 12 November 2005 (UTC) [reply]

WP:AIV

Hey, I blocked the user you removed from the list as you were removing it. He had already been blocked once, and warned, his last warning was done 5 hours after his last spamming link so I blocked him for 24 hours since I believe he probably just went offline and will return. If you don't agree, then you can unblock him since I wasn't sure. The user is 68.198.139.128. -- PRueda29 ^Ptalk29 01:54, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks! Since I'm new at adminship, I wanted to make sure it was ok. This is my first block (other than an impostor of me), but since it's only for 24 hours then it won't hurt him. Also, I didn't put the block warning because right after I blocked him I noticed you had removed his name without block, but I will do that now. Thanks again for your congratulations! -- PRueda29 ^Ptalk29 02:01, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Jtkiefer's RFB

GregAsche/Archive2

Thanks for your support on my request for bureaucratship.

The final outcome was (17/17/4) meaning that it failed, if you have any advice on how I can be a better editor or administrator please don't hesitate to leave a message on my talk page. Thanks again for your support. Jtkiefer ^{T | @ | C} ----- 20:29, 13 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Page move

Hello, could you please help me move a page. Could you please move Pontic-language to Pontic language. I'm afraid I messed up the redirects there, I was trying something. Rex^(talk) 00:00, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Fixed. Tito xd^(?!?) 00:04, 15 November 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Shihan Gordan Doversola

userpage vandalism

CBW RfA

Thanks and Congrats

Thanks

Congratulations!

Maryville Middle School

RP article

the wub's RfA

Titoxd's RfA

Can you give me a hand?

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Gay pubs in Leeds

Vandalism

WTF

PHOTOS

Counter Vandalism Unit Elections!

Minor oops...

Could you help with the article of the legal term "fair comment"?

My RFA

User 82.182.82.20

Monobook.js

User:210.8.54.35

Marren

User:210.55.249.78

Brandt

Note about category markup

Vandalism

Re Blocks

Communist Penis!

Talk page Vandalism

Grapes

Epirus

Thanks from Pamri

RfA thanks

Johann Wolfgang's RfA

Thanks for the revert on my user talk page

Janice Rogers Brown

My RFA

wikipedia-watch

FireFox RFA

My RfA

"Vandalism"

"Anthony Christian Copyright"

Epirus Protected

If you're about

a speedy needed

Adminship nomination

Psy guy's RfA

WP:AIV

Jtkiefer's RFB

Page move

Fir e Fo x RFA