User talk:RexGregorian

License tagging for Image:Humphrey de Trafford.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Humphrey de Trafford.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 12:06, 4 May 2007 (UTC)

Stretford Page

I have replied to your comments about "excessive editing", and changing "accurate" to "inaccurate" information on my talk page, but I'm repeating it here in case you don't see that.

"What information are you referring to? So far as I'm aware the only information that I've removed is unsourced information that can be easily put back if and when a verifiable source is found. And if you're aware of any inaccuracies then please feel free to point them out. I have been working on the Stretford article in an attempt to get it up to GA standard, and to pass its current GA review. So any help you can provide would be much appreciated."

Perhaps because of some original research you've carried out you may believe some information to be inaccurate, but I'm afraid that's not enough. It has to be verifiable, with third-party sources. Wikipedia:Verifiability --Malleus Fatuarum 21:05, 13 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

St Augustine (Parish and University Chaplancy)

Hi, thanks for your help on the edits. I see you have deleted two of the entrys for St Augustines. The original entries were made to show that three churches had stood on that spot and the dates they were there. There are other examples of this with other churches. Do you not feel that this could be helpful? I'm would like to clarify a tone for the article so as not to waste my time entering data which others feel is useless. (Anthony of the Desert (talk) 00:54, 11 December 2008 (UTC)).[reply]

Hi Anthony, You will find that most of these Parishes have had their churches rebuilt at least twice and usually on totally different sites each time, for example St Mary's, Levenshulme is onto its third church and each one was located in different parts of the district. St Augustines Parish was founded in 1820 and has been housed in a total of four different churches on three different sites, however all the sites were within a relatively small radius of each other and personally I would think that each Parish only needs one entry. If we began putting in a seperate entry for each incarnation of each church then it would not only get unusuably long but also very confusing.

With St Augustines as it is one of the earliest and most historically significant Parishes in the Diocese, I have been planning to write a Wikipedia page of its own at some point in the future covering St Augustines Parish. (Greg78uk (talk) 18:01, 11 December 2008 (UTC)).

Frances Lennon

Can you explain the reason for your recent addition to the Frances Lennon talk page regarding biographies of living persons, stating that "Controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous" what exactly is it on that page that you feel is controversial, poorly sourced or potentially libel.User:greg78uk (talk) 21:14, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

This is a standard template added to the talk page of all living individuals to prevent the addition of "controversial material about living persons that is unsourced or poorly sourced must be removed immediately, especially if potentially libellous". -- Magioladitis (talk) 22:41, 16 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Terence Brain

Thank you for your advice. I beleive that the following revised contribution would meet the guidelines, but thought it better to seek your opinion before editing the page again. I look forward to your feedback.

Bishop Brain has been the subject of critical comments in correspondence to the local newspaper in Rochdale (see ‘Action on convictions’, Rochdale Observer, Readers Letters, P22, 29 October 2008) and in contributions to a national academic conference on child abuse in September 2009 (see http://www.baspcan.org.uk/files/WS6%20-%20P.Gilligan.pdf ). These comments have focused on his alleged failure to answer questions regarding the ongoing canonical status of priests from his Diocese who have been convicted of criminal offences against children and sentenced to serve terms of imprisonment of 12 months or more. In particular, critics question whether he has informed the people of his diocese in sufficient detail about how he has followed Recommendations 77 and 78 of the Nolan Report (2001) in relevant cases (see http://www.bishop-accountability.org/resources/resource-files/reports/NolanReport.pdf ).

Gilligan Philip (talk) 10:12, 11 July 2010 (UTC)Gilligan Philip[reply]

St. Bedes College

Thanks for spotting the mistake 212.121.214.102 (talk) 11:02, 20 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Do you know what happened to the long-serving Biology master, Mr. Gibbons [Zoony] ? I've heard a very duisquieting story about him being assaulted outside the College. Is this true ? 212.121.210.45 (talk) 13:14, 13 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, RexGregorian. You have new messages at Scrivener-uki's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Disambiguation link notification for April 4

Hi. When you recently edited William Patrick Byrne, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page KCVO (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:04, 4 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for April 13

Hi. When you recently edited John Carmont, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Court of Sessions (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:11, 13 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for June 28

Hi. When you recently edited Henry Hanlon, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page John Vaughan (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 15:07, 28 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Philip Hughes (Catholic historian), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Louvain University (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:04, 26 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited St Chad's, Cheetham Hill, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Provost (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:12, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jose Gutierrez Guerra

Dear RexGregorian:

We will be sharing more historical materials in the next couple of weeks, including photographs, to the article, and are happy to contribute in improving the content. Thank you for your attention to this article and to the Wikipedia project.

Jose Gutierrez Guerra's personal papers kept at his presidential archive, administered by his grandson Jose Gutierrez Guerra Cano in La Paz, Bolivia fail to mention St. Beads. These papers contain correspondence between president Gutierrez Guerra and his family. We suspect the error to be traceable to a newspaper article based on incorrect information. However, if you have access to St. Beads historical or admission records that suggest otherwise, please share this information. These papers are in publication, and we would like to include St. Bedes if he attended, as claimed. Your help in the matter will be greatly appreciated.Tarapecosi (talk) 16:12, 5 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Henry Marshall (bishop of Salford), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Thomas Henshaw (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:54, 11 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 18

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited John Bilsborrow, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kirkham (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 08:56, 18 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

History of St. Bede's College

Please let us know when the next volume of the College's history will be ready, on the St Bede's College, Manchester Talk page ? I'm assuming you have a role in it's creation. 212.121.210.45 (talk) 13:27, 8 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:41, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for May 6

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Joseph Masterson, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Whalley Range. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:39, 6 May 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, RexGregorian. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, RexGregorian. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, RexGregorian. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:09, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:40, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:16, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:32, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]