User talk:Greentree0

Welcome!

Hi Greentree0! I noticed your contributions and wanted to welcome you to the Wikipedia community. I hope you like it here and decide to stay.

As you get started, you may find this short tutorial helpful:

Learn more about editing

Alternatively, the contributing to Wikipedia page covers the same topics.

If you have any questions, we have a friendly space where experienced editors can help you here:

Get help at the Teahouse

If you are not sure where to help out, you can find a task here:

Volunteer at the Task Center

Happy editing! 2601:19E:4180:6D50:65F5:930C:B0B2:CD63 (talk) 22:12, 16 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked as a sockpuppet

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abusing multiple accounts as a sockpuppet of User:Wildhorse3 per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Wildhorse3. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please review Wikipedia's guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Izno (talk) 05:41, 29 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Greentree0 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I do not understand why am I blocked. I do not have anything to do with the other user mentioned and this account is not a sock puppet. Secondly, I went through link where the so called "investigation" was done and it is very interesting to see the claims by some user which are literally hilarious and there is nothing at all which could be considered an evidence to declare my account as sock or anything of that sort. Thirdly, the reason stated is re-copy-paste, I don't see anything wrong with that. Two editors can have similar opinion on something and instead of writing all of it down, they might re-copy-paste stuff from other edits. I see nothing wrong in that. Greentree0 (talk) 03:33, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

When you create your account and one of your first edits is to reinstate an edit made by a blocked user, expect to be blocked. We call that meat puppetry. It's one thing if you were a long time, known, established editor and did so- but you weren't. 331dot (talk) 08:52, 17 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.