User talk:Greensaulberg

The following Wikipedia contributor has declared a personal or professional connection to the subject of this draft. Relevant policies and guidelines may include conflict of interest, autobiography, and neutral point of view.

Greensaulberg (talk · contribs) This user has declared a connection. (Family Member, disclosures, article drafts or diffs showing COI contributions.)

Welcome!

Hello, Greensaulberg, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! --David Biddulph (talk) 10:30, 6 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia and copyright

Hello Greensaulberg, and welcome to Wikipedia. All or some of your addition(s) to User:Greensaulberg/Michaelbolus has had to be removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material without permission from the copyright holder. While we appreciate your contributing to Wikipedia, there are certain things you must keep in mind about using information from your sources to avoid copyright or plagiarism issues here.

You can only copy/translate a small amount of a source, and you must mark what you take as a direct quotation with double quotation marks (") and cite the source using an inline citation. You can read about this at Wikipedia:Non-free content in the sections on "text". See also Help:Referencing for beginners, for how to cite sources here.
Aside from limited quotation, you must put all information in your own words and structure, in proper paraphrase. Following the source's words too closely can create copyright problems, so it is not permitted here; see Wikipedia:Close paraphrasing. (There is a college-level introduction to paraphrase, with examples, hosted by the Online Writing Lab of Purdue.) Even when using your own words, you are still, however, asked to cite your sources to verify information and to demonstrate that the content is not original research.
Our primary policy on using copyrighted content is Wikipedia:Copyrights. You may also want to review Wikipedia:Copy-paste.
If you own the copyright to the source you want to copy or are a designated agent, you may be able to license that text so that we can publish it here. However, there are steps that must be taken to verify that license before you do. See Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials.
In very rare cases (that is, for sources that are public domain or compatibly licensed), it may be possible to include greater portions of a source text. However, please seek help at the help desk before adding such content to the article. 99.9% of sources may not be added in this way, so it is necessary to seek confirmation first. If you do confirm that a source is public domain or compatibly licensed, you will still need to provide full attribution; see Wikipedia:Plagiarism for the steps you need to follow.
Also note that Wikipedia articles may not be copied or translated without attribution. If you want to copy or translate from another Wikipedia project or article, you can, but please follow the steps in Wikipedia:Copying within Wikipedia.

It's very important that contributors understand and follow these practices, as policy requires that people who persistently do not must be blocked from editing. If you have any questions about this, you are welcome to leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Justlettersandnumbers (talk) 23:58, 10 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Conflict of interest

Hi Greensaulberg. Based upon this post at User talk:MichaelBolusStudio#re user name, I am assuming that you are the same editor who identified himself as the stepson of Michael Bolus. If that is the case, then please be advised that the advice you received regarding Wikipedia's guideline on conflict-of-interest still applies even though you are editing from a different account. Although Wikipedia does not expressly prohibit COI editing, it is something that is highly discouraged. Taking a look at Wikipedia:Plain and simple conflict of interest guide might help explain some of the limitations placed upon COI editing. -- Marchjuly (talk) 00:50, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hello again Marchjuly, yes i am he! i freely declared this to D Biddulph back when the COI of Michaelbolusstudio was pointed out to me. Can you advise as to best way to proceed. I think Michael Bolus and his colleagues in the new generation sculptors are notable and wish to add their bio's to wikipedia. I am working on bio of Tim Scott as well as the new generation exhibition of 1965. I could, i suppose, start another account and not declare my conflict or even ask someone else to to present the article's, when (and if) finished. However, this seems underhand. Is there no hope of me getting it passed?Greensaulberg (talk) 10:31, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I would not advise you starting another account unless it is for one of the legitimate reasons listed at WP:VALIDALT. The archives of WP:SPI are full of editors who thought they could get away with using multiple accounts. There are quite a few savy Wikipedians who are very good at detecting that kind of thing, so i'm not sure it's worth the risk of being indefinitely blocked. As I said, COI editing is only discouraged, so if you're up front about it and your edits show you're here, then you'll be fine. You'll have lots of leeway while working on your drafts and the AfC reviewers will help you make sure the drafts adhere to relevant policies and guidelines. You might find, however, that you'll have less "freedom" to edit if/once your drafts get elevated to article status. You'll still be able to make non-controversial changes or correct violations of WP:BLP, but you'll be expected to use the article talk page to discuss anything more major. As long as you remember that being related to Bolus does not give you any type of ownership rights over the article, you'll be fine. As for notability, the AfC reviewers will check what you have and answer that question for you. My advice to you is to take their suggestions in good faith and try to make the improvements they suggest. Some editors get discouraged when their draft is rejected, and decide to move the draft to the mainspace themselves. I don't recommend doing that since such articles, especially those with notaibility issues, using end up being quickly nominated for deletion. If you're stuck, you can always ask for assistance at Wikipedia:Requested articles or even Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Sculpture. One of the members of that Wikiproject may even be familiar with your stepdad and the other artists whose drafts you're working on. Good luck. -- Marchjuly (talk) 11:46, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Marchjuly, Thank you for your aasistence and advice. The New Generation Sculptors are setting a lot of interest at the moment and i am sure that within the next few years there will be lots more refs and citations available, better writers too! I am withdrawing the Michael Bolus article and the other i am working on. Thanks again for your help.Greensaulberg (talk) 13:10, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

You can still work on those other drafts if you want. Just try and submit them through Wikipedia:Articles for creation so that other more experienced editors can help you get them up to Wikipedia standards. All you have to do is show that sources establishing the notability of the subjects exist per WP:NEXIST. If you can do that, then your drafts have a good chance of being approved. If you don't want to write them yourselves, then ask someone else to at Wikipedia:Requested articles. As for the other article, what you're describing sounds a bit like WP:TOOSOON. You're going to have to show that the subject staisfies WP:N now, not that it might satisfy it a few years from now. Good luck. -- Marchjuly (talk) 13:28, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

User:Greensaulberg/Michaelbolus

Note that if you wish to have User:Greensaulberg/Michaelbolus deleted you can do so by adding {{Db-u1}} or {{Db-userreq}} to the top of the page. --David Biddulph (talk) 13:12, 11 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Michael Bolus.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Bolus.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Problems with upload of File:Bowbend 1964.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bowbend 1964.jpg. You don't seem to have said where the image came from, who created it, or what the copyright status is. We require this information to verify that the image is legally usable on Wikipedia, and because most image licenses require giving credit to the image's creator.

To add this information, click on this link, then click the "Edit" tab at the top of the page and add the information to the image's description. If you need help, post your question on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 20 July 2017 (UTC)[reply]