User talk:Greenfrog23

Block evasion

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text at the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.

OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:33, 3 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I’ve maybe gone about it in the wrong way, I didn’t really understand Wikipedia properly but am starting to now, although I have been persistent I’ve never been angry towards any member I was just trying to change some things, I accept the ban but if you could at least let me back at some point I’ll do things different next time. Greenfrog23 (talk) 21:16, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

There's no reason to unblock you if you're just going to fuss about the city/resort status for Brighton. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:29, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

ok I won’t fuss about it anymore although I did like my contribution of adding citation to it, if I can come back and maybe do that ? Greenfrog23 (talk) 21:35, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

No. Please find another hobby. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 21:37, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Greenfrog23 (talk) 21:41, 19 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

A lot edits wasn’t even me. Greenfrog23 (talk) 12:00, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

All I was doing was correcting things that needed doing, you seemed to of followed me changing it all back, I don’t understand why? Surely we all want things to be right on here? Greenfrog23 (talk) 13:32, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not going to say this again: Brighton and Hove is correctly noted as a city. The article Brighton is about an area which is part of Brighton and Hove and is not a city, just as West London is a part of the city of London but not a city itself. I'm not sure why that's difficult to follow. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 14:18, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

It’s not the same though, west London is in London yes, Brighton isn’t in Brighton and Hove, Brighton IS Brighton and Hove, that’s the difference. Brighton (Brighton and Hove). Greenfrog23 (talk) 15:56, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I was just trying to unify it all that all Greenfrog23 (talk) 15:57, 21 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

I don't care about your emails. If after numerous explanations you still don't understand that the Brighton article has a different scope than the Brighton and Hove article, you shouldn't be editing Wikipedia. Talk page access removed. OhNoitsJamie ^Talk 18:22, 22 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked for sockpuppetry

Wikipedia's technical logs indicate that this user account has been or may be used abusively per the evidence presented at Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Greenfrog23. It has been blocked indefinitely from editing to prevent abuse. In addition, your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked.

Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted.
If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should review the guide to appealing blocks, and then appeal your block by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

Administrators: Checkusers have access to confidential system logs not accessible by the public or by administrators due to the Wikimedia Foundation's privacy policy. You must not loosen or remove this block, or issue an IP block exemption, without consulting with a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee. Administrators who undo checkuser blocks without permission from a checkuser or the Arbitration Committee may be summarily desysopped.

Dreamy Jazz ^{talk to me | my contributions} 17:50, 28 June 2023 (UTC)[reply]