User talk:GreenSally

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

GreenSally (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

this account did not make any edits that I am aware of so how did it get associated with OrangeLisa?

Decline reason:

Obvious sock is obvious. Also, the blocking admin is a checkuser. Further frivolous unblock requests may result in you losing the ability to edit this page. Syrthiss (talk) 15:13, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Not making a unblock request. I just want to know how this account was associated with OrangeLisa. What happened on this account that caused the sock identity to be attached to it. Can you please let me know that. Thank youGreenSally (talk) 15:19, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

As far as I know this account was not used but I may be wrong on that. I did not see any activity on it but perhaps you have information about that activity. Regardless just please tell me how this account became associated with OrangeLisa. How was the sock association made between the 2 accounts? GreenSally (talk) 15:25, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Freedom5000, we're not going to help you learn how sockpuppets are found out here. Gwen Gale (talk) 15:28, 21 December 2010 (UTC)[reply]