User talk:Green06

This is a Wikipedia user talk page.
This is not an encyclopedia article or the talk page for an encyclopedia article. If you find this page on any site other than Wikipedia, you are viewing a mirror site. Be aware that the page may be outdated and that the user whom this page is about may have no personal affiliation with any site other than Wikipedia. The original talk page is located at https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/User_talk:Green06.

Click here to leave me a new message

Death

I reverted your reversion of the signs of death because the two items were not applicable to the list they were on. The list is meant to be signs that a person is already dead. Dizziness and shortness of breath do not indicate death has occured. In fact, they indicate that the person is still alive, at least for now. I am not sure if they are even legitimate signs of impending death. (Most people with dizziness are not about to die.) Even if they are, then they belong on a different list. I am not sure if they were added as a subtle sort of joke or by somebody who just misunderstood the context of the list. Either way, I don't think they are useful. --DanielRigal (talk) 22:42, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

You're quite right, my mistake. Thanks for clarifying. Green06 (talk) 22:52, 31 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

afd

[1] Sumbuddi (talk) 22:56, 9 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Pro-aging trance and others

An editor has nominated one or more articles which you have created or worked on, for deletion. The nominated articles are Pro-aging trance, Methuselah Foundation. We appreciate your contributions, but the nominator doesn't believe that the article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion and has explained why in his/her nomination (see also Wikipedia:Notability and "What Wikipedia is not").

Your opinions on whether the article meets inclusion criteria and what should be done with the article are welcome; please participate in the discussion(s) by adding your comments to the relevant discussion pages: Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Pro-aging trance for Pro-aging trance, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Methuselah Foundation for Methuselah Foundation. Please be sure to sign your comments with four tildes (~~~~).

You may also edit the article during the discussion to improve it but should not remove the articles for deletion template from the top of the article; such removal will not end the deletion debate.

Please note: This is an automatic notification by a bot. I have nothing to do with this article or the deletion nomination, and can't do anything about it. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 01:04, 10 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Methuselah Foundation

You may also wish to consider using a Wizard to help you create articles. See the Article Wizard.

Thank you.

A tag has been placed on Methuselah Foundation, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article seems to be unambiguous advertising that only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become an encyclopedia article. Please read the general criteria for speedy deletion, particularly item G11, as well as the guidelines on spam.

If you can indicate why the subject of this article is not blatant advertising, . Clicking that button will take you to the talk page where you will find a pre-formatted place for you to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the the article's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. You may freely add information to the article that would confirm the subject's notability under Wikipedia guidelines. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would help make it encyclopedic, as well as adding any citations from independent reliable sources to ensure that the article will be verifiable. Feel free to leave a note on my talk page if you have any questions about this. --TimL (talk) 18:38, 3 July 2011 (UTC)[reply]