User talk:Greedtn

Hello, Greedtn, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to ask me on my talk page or place {{Help me}} on this page and someone will drop by to help. Red Director (talk) 03:19, 21 March 2019 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Sarah Spillane) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Sarah Spillane.

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

Great article. Thanks for writing it!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|JSFarman}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

JSFarman (talk) 20:22, 4 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

September 2019

Hello Greedtn. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Greedtn. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Greedtn|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:15, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSS, Thanks for your message. I Highway bus driver and love watching films, and I am not connected to article person, but i liked their works and for my self happiness, I used to spend my free time to develop an article and contribute to Wikipedia with a small help of mine. Just felt bad when you moved my draft without any notice to me, because i spent around a month of my free time and you just rejected it. Anyway, Thanks and i felt bad for myself on wasting time thinking that i am also a Wikipedia contributor. Thanks again Greedtn (talk) 10:24, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

You uploaded three files as your own work so can you please explain where did you get those images from? GSS (talk|c|em) 10:46, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GSS, I used to Google Search Engine help for it, if you want particular details, I will check my history and give you. Thanks Greedtn (talk) 07:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, please and also please provide links where you saw those images. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:18, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Hanadi Elyan

The article Hanadi Elyan has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Film directors are not always automatically notable just because their films exist. There is no significant coverage in independent reliable sources and no evidence of satisfying WP:CREATIVE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:26, 8 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello GSS, sources for director are below :

BBC 5 LIVE INTERVIEWS - http://www.peterbowes.com/2019/06/hanadi-elyan-filmmaker.html
Meet the Filmmakers - https://www.filmindependent.org/programs/fiscal-sponsorship/salmas-home/
Arab Women Filmmakers - http://www.themsff.org/case-study/arab-women-filmmakers/
NADIA’S VISA - https://www.jcctunisie.org/jcc2018/eng/filmsDetail.php?id_film=24
NADIA’S VISA - http://www.20minmax.com/nadias-visa/

Greedtn (talk) 07:03, 14 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Hanadi Elyan for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Hanadi Elyan is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Hanadi Elyan until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GSS (talk|c|em) 10:14, 15 September 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Dar Gai has been accepted

Dar Gai, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Missvain (talk) 19:04, 5 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]