User talk:GreatSnake666

January 2009

Hi. You might want to be wary of your edits - at the moment you look like a single purpose account (single purpose being to add VGChartz award information). It's a good idea to have a wide range of edits, rather than concentrating on insertion of a particular piece of data. Thanks! Fin ©™ 08:47, 8 January 2009 (UTC) Sorry, im new to wikipedia! Will take that into account!--GreatSnake666 (talk) 17:29, 8 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

GOTY Blogspot

Hi there. Blogs are almost always considered unreliable, regardless of content - from WP:V: "it is usually not acceptable in Wikipedia to cite...blogs". Thanks! Fin ©™ 15:15, 9 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

November 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to List of best-selling video games. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. VG Chartz is not a reliable source. They pull their numbers out of their ass, stop using their numbers. TJ Spyke 19:51, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to List of best-selling video games. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. That site is just using VG Chartz's numbers (they come right out and say it). TJ Spyke 22:15, 2 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]