User talk:GravityUp/ArchivesCB/2009/July
This is an archive of past discussions about User:GravityUp. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
re:Jacksonbillia
Thanks for the message,however i would like to contest the speedy deletion notice, because the article has both contemporary and historical significance. It pertaining to michael jackson the pop legend who recently died..
- {{done}} Your article is now available for deletion discussion.-- Dspradau → talk 15:12, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
Vandalism alert
{{resolved}} You have been paged because a user has reported a high level of vandalism and you are listed as a contact.
This is an automatically generated message. If problems occur, please contact User:nathanww. —Preceding unsigned comment added by The King's a-poopin' (talk • contribs) 12:31, 11 March 2009 (UTC)
afd
{{resolved}} We don't use symbols in our comments at AfD--take a look and you will see nobody else does. DGG (talk) 19:09, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
- I'm sorry about the symbols. I could not find a anything that mentioned symbol use in comments for AfD. I can gladly stop though.-- Dspradau → talk 12:52, 21 July 2009 (UTC)
AfD nomination of Jackobillia
An article that you have been involved in editing, Jackobillia, has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Jackobillia. Thank you.
Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. PhantomSteve (Contact Me, My Contribs) 07:26, 20 July 2009 (UTC)
Removal of PROD from Martin Scorcese and Robert De Niro
{{Resolved}} Hello Dspradau, this is an automated message from SDPatrolBot to inform you the PROD template you added to Martin Scorcese and Robert De Niro has been removed. It was removed by R013 with the following edit summary '(I don't think there's anything wrong with providing more detailed information about something people will be interested in. Please explain to me what is wrong with this article.)'. Please consider discussing your concerns with R013 before pursuing deletion further yourself. If you still think the article should be deleted after communicating with the 'dePRODer,' you may want to send the article to AfD for community discussion. Thank you, SDPatrolBot (talk) 16:55, 22 July 2009 (UTC) (Learn how to opt out of these messages)
- I have dropped the PROD. Creator and I are still discussing how to further the article, though.-- Dspradau → talk 13:44, 23 July 2009 (UTC)
Photos of Fond du Lac
I noticed that your comment that you are willing to take pictures in FdL on the Octagon house photo. I was planning on doing a photo shoot there sometime. Please do it! I can clean up if you miss any. I was thinking:
- St. Mary Springs High School - located at the bottom of the Niagara Escarpment on Wisconsin Highway 23 - can skip as I drive near there on the US 151 bypass at least once per month
- Winnebago Lutheran Academy
- University of Wisconsin-Fond du Lac building (I got the sign)
- downtown (Main St.)
- City hall
- County courthouse
- County Fairgrounds
- Mercury Marine headquarters
- maybe the Miracle Mile??
- everything in National Register of Historic Places listings in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin
Thanks for all of your help! Let me know! I've added your talk page to my watch list, so please respond here. Royalbroil 00:51, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- Sure, I'd love to do it. I may get a few in today, but tomorrow I can go around and take a bunch. Thanks for the list. It really helps to know what photos we are missing. Thanks again! -- Dspradau → talk 13:15, 9 July 2009 (UTC)
- I have now upload and put up a bunch of the National Register of Historic Places listings in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin photos. I also have the UW, City hall, Miracle Mile, ect. photos that I will put up tomorrow. Halfway done. -- Dspradau → talk 00:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks for the photos! It's looking better already. I see that you haven't included a description or source. Both are REAL important. A missing source is enough to get a picture deleted. You just need to say that you took it yourself for the source. For description, please use a longer description, like the Octagon House in Fond du Lac, Wisconsin.
- I have now upload and put up a bunch of the National Register of Historic Places listings in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin photos. I also have the UW, City hall, Miracle Mile, ect. photos that I will put up tomorrow. Halfway done. -- Dspradau → talk 00:52, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Another big deal on Commons is categories. I'm an admin there as well as here on the English Wikipedia. Commons is merely a collection of images and videos, so it is organized by categories. You have not categorized that image. All Wisconsin images on the National Register of Historic Places get added to the Commons category Category:National Register of Historic Places in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin. I always add them to a city or county category, which adding them to the NHRP/FDL Co will do. I'd add the NRHP images to the Category:Fond du Lac, Wisconsin as a refinement. Thanks! Royalbroil 01:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks I relized last night I forgot some info I'm going back through them as I speak. Thanks! -- Dspradau → talk 13:21, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- If there is anything else that needs fixing with this batch let me know. -- Dspradau → talk 13:54, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
- Another big deal on Commons is categories. I'm an admin there as well as here on the English Wikipedia. Commons is merely a collection of images and videos, so it is organized by categories. You have not categorized that image. All Wisconsin images on the National Register of Historic Places get added to the Commons category Category:National Register of Historic Places in Fond du Lac County, Wisconsin. I always add them to a city or county category, which adding them to the NHRP/FDL Co will do. I'd add the NRHP images to the Category:Fond du Lac, Wisconsin as a refinement. Thanks! Royalbroil 01:27, 10 July 2009 (UTC)
AWB
Hi, please don't use AWB to make trivial edits such as this one. It's against the rules of use. --Closedmouth (talk) 07:51, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Ok thanks. I was reading section 4.2 of WP:WPCHECK and it mentioned AWB could handle them. I guess it does break the rules of use though. I apologize.-- Dspradau → talk 14:55, 30 July 2009 (UTC)
- Just giving you a heads-up. --Closedmouth (talk) 06:20, 31 July 2009 (UTC)