User talk:Grantsangsterr

May 2022

This is your only warning; if you violate Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy by inserting unsourced or poorly sourced defamatory content into an article or any other Wikipedia page again, as you did at 2022 Buffalo mass shooting, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. In regards to this: [1] Veggies (talk) 22:05, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 31 hours for violations of Wikipedia's biographies of living persons policy. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions.

If you think there are good reasons for being unblocked, please read the guide to appealing blocks, then add the following text below the block notice on your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Acroterion (talk) 22:32, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Grantsangsterr (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

Please unblock me. I admit I provided sources that reflected the accuracy of the situation particularly but not fully, and will provide the best sources reflecting the BLP issues next time when editing. --Grantsangsterr (talk) 23:56, 14 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not seem to be your first account used to add hoaxes. NinjaRobotPirate (talk) 06:34, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

And you were completely, profoundly wrong, and were edit-warring. Acroterion (talk) 00:00, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Note - I was the initial warner. I'm surprised that the user only received a 31 hour block. It's clear to me this is a vandal-only account trying to shitpost some brain-dead meme about a particular singer being a white nationalist. It's not even good shitposting. The user posted full inline citation templates to try to make it seem like his garbage was actually in the source he cited, which makes it obvious that this isn't some new user to Wikipedia. Then, he tried using a single-subscriber medium.com blog post as a source to continue his tripe. I would recommend an indef block plus a sock check. -- Veggies (talk) 03:42, 15 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]