User talk:Grant barrybigfan

March 2015

Hello, I'm NickW557. I wanted to let you know that I undid one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Grant Gustin— because it didn’t appear constructive to me. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 23:31, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making nonconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Grant Gustin with this edit. Your edits appear to constitute vandalism and have been reverted or removed. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism. Thank you. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 01:41, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Grant Gustin, you may be blocked from editing.
Your edits have been automatically marked as vandalism and have been automatically reverted. The following is the log entry regarding this vandalism: Grant Gustin was changed by Grant barrybigfan (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.892066 on 2015-03-10T01:42:15+00:00 . Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 01:42, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize a page, as you did with this edit to Grant Gustin. Nick—^Contact/_Contribs 01:50, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 02:14, 10 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Unblock reason is I was was putting real info and I deserve to be unblocked