User talk:Grandmasterkush

License tagging for Image:MarkWarner.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:MarkWarner.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 22:06, 22 July 2007 (UTC)

Redirect of Mark A. A. Warner

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Mark A. A. Warner, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Mark A. A. Warner is a redirect to a non-existent page (CSD R1).

To contest the tagging and request that administrators wait before possibly deleting Mark A. A. Warner, please affix the template {{hangon}} to the page, and put a note on its talk page. If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. Feel free to contact the bot operator if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot, bearing in mind that this bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion; it does not perform any nominations or deletions itself. CSDWarnBot 06:00, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please assume good faith when dealing with other editors. See Wikipedia:Assume good faith for the guidelines on this. GreenJoe 06:08, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia. However, we remind you not to attack other editors. Please comment on the contributions and not the contributors. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. GreenJoe 06:10, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mark Warner

I think you misunderstood my point if you think that I was expressing any kind of personal opinion as to Mark Warner's notability vis-à-vis that of El-Farouk Khaki. Warner was up for debate, Khaki wasn't, and my statement made no judgements about notability whatsoever. In fact, I personally agree that they're all notable enough for articles; my comment was addressing the appropriateness of the process that was followed in that case. Bearcat 03:41, 7 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

No worries... Bearcat 05:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Scatternet

Stub status can be kind of tricky and subjective. There's no easy answer to that; it has as much to do with how comprehensive the article is in covering the subject as how long it is. A relatively short article can be not a stub if it basically says everything that needs to be said about the topic, and a longer one can be still a stub if there's more that can be written about it. I don't know enough about scatternets to tell if the article is comprehensive enough, unfortunately. Bearcat 05:57, 8 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

AfD nomination of Mark Warner (Canadian politician)

An article that you have been involved in editing, Mark Warner (Canadian politician), has been listed for deletion. If you are interested in the deletion discussion, please participate by adding your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Mark Warner (Canadian politician). Thank you. GreenJoe 20:27, 9 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]