User talk:Grand Slam 7
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Thank you
[edit]Thank you for your suport in my RfA. In a few months after I graduate I think I'll be able to come back and try again later. I'll be sure to be involved in MfD, AfD. Do you have any tips or suggestions for me based on what you remember? From your talk page, it looks like you are a new member. If you need any help just ask! X [Mac Davis] (SUPERDESK|Help me improve) 06:40, 24 October 2006 (UTC)
RfA thanks
[edit]
|
Please accept my thanks for your support in my successful RfA, which I was gratified to learn passed without opposition on October 25, 2006. I am looking forward to serving as an administrator and hope that I prove worthy of your trust. With my best wishes, --MCB 01:08, 26 October 2006 (UTC) |
RfA thanks
[edit] |
Thank you so much, Grand Slam 7, for your support in my RfA, which passed on November 11, 2006, with a final tally of 82/0/2. I am humbled by the kind support of so many fellow Wikipedians, and I vow to continue to work and improve with the help of these new tools. Should you have any request, do not hesitate to contact me. Best regards, Húsönd 20:44, 11 November 2006 (UTC) |
Possible deletion of Arriva Northumbria
[edit]Thanks for removing the tag. P.S. The taking offense bit was only a bit of anger at the time! I hope you didn't take any offense! Sorry,
Once again, Thank you!
Arriva436 14:52, 18 November 2006 (UTC)
TV9
[edit]You (quite rightly) added a {{db-nocontext}} to TV9. I'd been reading about Indian TV News channels earlier today, so I thought I recognised it. I detagged it and expanded it a bit. It's still not very good, but I don't think it's a speedy deletion candidate any more. Cheers ! Angus McLellan (Talk) 23:38, 26 November 2006 (UTC)
Redwall series
[edit]This is a {{speedy}} page, not a redirect. Please leave it as it is.--Anthony.bradbury 21:35, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Any page which is a gratuitous insult is a {{speedy}} by definition.--Anthony.bradbury 21:38, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
- Page is now correct, and correctly redirected. A vandal had added the insult and removed the redirect. You were right - I was wrong. My apologies.--Anthony.bradbury 21:51, 6 December 2006 (UTC)
I made several changes to Limelight Networks, and I think the article should be okay now, with notability adequately established. --Eastmain 02:48, 14 January 2007 (UTC)
Newyorkbrad's RfA
[edit]Thank you for your support on my RfA, which closed favorably this morning, and for your kind comment accompanying your !vote. I appreciate the confidence the community has placed in me and am looking forward to my new responsibilities. Please let me know if ever you have any comments or suggestions, especially as I am learning how to use the tools. Best regards, Newyorkbrad 18:20, 21 January 2007 (UTC)
Hello,
An Arbitration case in which you commented has been opened: Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic. Please add any evidence you may wish the arbitrators to consider to the evidence sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Evidence. You may also contribute to the case on the workshop sub-page, Wikipedia:Requests for arbitration/Free Republic/Workshop.
On behalf of the Arbitration Committee, Newyorkbrad 20:32, 13 February 2007 (UTC)
Bearian's RfA
[edit]Thank you for supporting my RfA, which passed 63 to 1. I hope that I'm doing a good job so far. Bearian 20:33, 9 October 2007 (UTC)
The article Camp Pathfinder has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- No evidence of notability.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 15:31, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Camp Pathfinder for deletion
[edit]
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Pathfinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 20:48, 5 May 2014 (UTC)
Nomination of Camp Pathfinder for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Camp Pathfinder is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Camp Pathfinder (3rd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Andy Mabbett (Pigsonthewing); Talk to Andy; Andy's edits 19:32, 3 August 2015 (UTC)