User talk:Grand Moff Brian

This user may have left Wikipedia. Grand Moff Brian has not edited Wikipedia since 1 May 2009. As a result, any requests made here may not receive a response. If you are seeking assistance, you may need to approach someone else.

Adminship

If you keep up your contributions, you can run for adminship. General Eisenhower 22:55, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Oh and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. Wikipedia needs these edits because our growth is slow. General Eisenhower 23:01, 16 April 2006 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Dinosaurs

Hi Grand Moff Brian!

There's currently less than 100 dinosaurs left on the Missing dinosaur page. We've come a long way! I was thinking that since there's just under 100 dinosaurs left, and since there are 25 of us signed on for the project, if we each wrote about four articles, we'd be done! Well, not "done", obviously, as many of the articles are in need of expansion. But then we could focus on expansion and other things.

You could take, say, Riojasuchus, Rocasaurus, Ruehleia, and Santanaraptor.

It's just an idea, of course, and you're of course not obligated and can do whatever you like; I just figured I'd mention the idea, and see if you were interested. No harm, right?

Take care, --Firsfron 07:18, 23 April 2006 (UTC) :)[reply]

Hey Grand Moff Brian! You've been absent for a long time, but I noticed the other day you're active again. With all your work on dinosaurs, have you any interest in Wikipedia:WikiProject_Dinosaurs, a project that develops the Wikipedia articles on dinosaurs? You're not on our modest list of members, but would be, I can see from your edits, a welcome addition. I hope you'll consider it, because you would be a big boon to our group. Take care, --Firsfron 02:13, 22 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Awesome. I saw you had contributed to many dinosaur articles in the past. I look forward to seeing you around! Welcome to the team! :)--Firsfron 21:56, 27 May 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Agujaceratops?

Oh man, these changes are coming quick..........googled, came to nix. Do you know much about the paper, ahve the rest of the ceratopsophile paleonotologists accepted this one? If so I can hive off the mariscalensis bit I stuck onto chasmosaurus. cheers Cas Liber 13:05, 2 June 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Southwestern Dinosaurs?

Hi Grand Moff Brian,

I see you have been adding the category Category:Southwestern Dinosaurs to several genera-level articles. Isn't that Amerocentric? I'm assuming you mean Southwestern U.S., because I can't think of another usage for the word. This category may be problematic... Firsfron of Ronchester 00:29, 2 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

The category has been nominated for deletion. You can weigh in here. Best wishes, Firsfron of Ronchester 02:41, 3 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of The Humongous Book of Dinosaurs for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Humongous Book of Dinosaurs is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Humongous Book of Dinosaurs until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. SL93 (talk) 23:37, 11 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:38, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]