User talk:Grahambrunk

Vault Was Discontinued

Unless you have it in your locale, and would care to write about it, Vault was indeed discontinued. I'll be reverting your edit unless you can prove otherwise. Ilikenwf (talk) 04:40, 28 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Graham

Hi, I added some info like you wanted :) Mike Beckham 08:31, 14 March 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Jeopardy! episode status deletion

The status of the current existence of a TV show's source material is consequential because it determines reair/reissue eligibility. See The Honeymooners and I Love Lucy, TV shows made during the time when most new TV programming was destroyed/not saved, whose longevity into present-day is owed to their preservation. I Love Lucy was recorded directly to film, setting the precedent for virtually all present-day sitcoms; The Honeymooners used a kinescope-like process. Reissue/reair eligibility determines whether new generations will ever get to see shows, either on cable television (networks like GSN continuously air Jeopardy! seasons only because they are preserved, or cannot air them because they are not) or in the future over Internet distribution, which has implications for the show as a source of future revenue for its copyright holders (see the long tail effect). You might also note that the explanation of the incongruency in Trebek-era show numbering is required to permit accurate calculation of the total number of shows produced as shown in the infobox. I can understand your wanting sourcing for this section, but I hope you will be pursuaded that its deletion does a disservice to the article. I ask you to reconsider your deletion and revert it. Robert K S (talk) 01:32, 3 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I recognize that, between you and I, we do not have a consensus about this issue, and I will work toward consensus. But I can't accept complete deletion of the section on a temporary basis until it can be sourced because doing so will result in the permanent deletion of images that will have been orphaned. The information in the section about Fleming is accurate to the best of our knowledge. (It's not a printed publication but see, for example, [1]) When there are disputes like this I work very hard to find solid sourcing. But I don't think you should defend deletion of information on sourcing grounds when there is a lack of dispute about the accuracy of the information. (Also, there is an irony to the situation in that you are arguing for the deletion of information about something you consider unimportant when the subject of that information is the deletion of information that someone considered unimportant.) Robert K S (talk) 22:18, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Almost forgot to mention: I'm puzzled by your claim that a discussion of episode status is unique to the Jeopardy! article. Episode status is an important point on many older television programs (it answers the question, will anyone ever be able to see this show again?) and a fairly large number of Wikipedia articles address this question. [2] Robert K S (talk) 22:23, 7 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Episode status is a rather common section for television show articles and for game shows in particular. (Apparently, you didn't click on my link [3] above.) No need to take this ad hominem--let's keep the discussion to the merits. Is the information notable? You say no. You're wrong. Is the information accurate? You say no. You're wrong. Is the information unsourced? You say no. You're right. So give me time to find appropriate citations. Please stop reverting. You're not doing the article any favors. Robert K S (talk) 01:38, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

That a handful of unknown episodes might conceivably exist on tape or kinescope somewhere is not a rationale for deletion of this section. The main point has not been disputed: neither NBC, nor Merv Griffin Productions, nor any other entity has been found to have a complete library of Art Fleming episodes, and extensive searches have been made by many interested persons, whereas, on the other hand, the Sony library of Trebek episodes is completely intact as evidenced by re-airings. You're going down an inappropriate path by making assumptions/accusations about personal knowledge, and if you have specific details you would be willing to impart, I would enjoy knowing what your archive has. Robert K S (talk) 01:59, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

You haven't told me what information you believe to be inaccurate. Anyway, it sounds to me like what you actually oppose is is a list of "episodes known to exist", which I agree is crufty and could be summarized with a simple sentence like the one that, I believe, is already in the article "only a handful of episodes are known to exist..." By deleting the whole section, you're simply overstepping and meeting resistance to a section that has been in place and has demonstrated utility and notability. You're also not working to meet consensus by continuing to edit war. Consensus does not mean "keep doing the same thing until everybody else gives up". It means "keep proposing new solutions until you can find agreement". Why not try making the constructive edits you believe will benefit the article, rather than continuing to delete the text outright? Robert K S (talk) 03:40, 8 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:Wptvlogo.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:Wptvlogo.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:22, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Re: WNEU

Okay, I changed the statement in the WHDH article saying what an NBC spokesperson said, he didn't specifically say WNEU, he said "including using our existing broadcast license to launch an NBC owned and operated station", though that could be inferred as WNEU because that is a station that they own. But anyway, saying its WNEU would be original research now that I realize. ViperSnake151 Talk 14:26, 5 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Just for your information and as a clarification of your statement in your WNEU edit, WNEU is not a translator for Telemundo it is the primary affiliate for the Boston area, You might have been have been thinking of WTMU-LP a low power television station also in Boston which is the secondary station for Telemundo, It does make sense that NBC would make WNEU the new NBC O&O affiliate while switching Telemundo's primary affiliation to WTMU-LP. Rosie, Queen of Corona (talk) 15:18, 6 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry but, Huh? Acording to the WTMU-LP article it says "WNEU channel 60 (although ZGS considers WNEU to be the primary)." so how can you say that WNEU isn't the primary, also WNEU is a full-power station and as stated before WTMU is low power so I believe that you got it in reserve WNEU is primary - WTMU secondary, Why would NBC put a low power station as the primary over a full power station, LP stations have a limited coverage whereas full power expand a lot further. Rosie, Queen of Corona (talk) 04:23, 7 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dillardsclosed.JPG

Thanks for uploading File:Dillardsclosed.JPG. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information; to add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia.

For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 19:08, 11 June 2009 (UTC)[reply]

150 Worth

I've re-added your contribution, 150 Worth, back on Template:Palm Beach County Malls. But I moved all streets and neighborhoods that are significance shopping destinations, to Template:Palm Beach County Shopping Districts and Streets. Just a notice. [[User:AZ'sReincarnation|]] (talk) 23:37, 21 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Connable (2nd nomination)

You tried to start an AfD for Joel Connable but it didn't work, since there was a previously closed discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Connable. I have created an AfD with the proper name, Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Joel Connable (2nd nomination). Please read the original AfD, and if you still feel that the article should be deleted, add your comments to the 2nd nomination AfD. My own view is that he appears to be notable. -- Eastmain (talk) 15:50, 28 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File:PalmBeachMall1970.jpg

Postcards generally aren't public domain. I altered the FUR to indicate that the image is most likely copyrighted, but an acceptable fair-use for its historic significance. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • ^{(Many otters • One bat • One hammer)} 20:16, 19 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Florida

In reference to your edit summaries, Tallahassee has well over 100,000 people (about 171K; it's listed in the "City Population > 150,000" portion of the table). I'm not wedded to the Coral Springs picture (I didn't add it, even though I was one of the editors who pushed that article to Good Article status), but the gallery is in the "Largest cities and towns" section, and West Palm Beach is not listed in that section. All of the other pictures are of cities that are in that listing. Let's not confuse the reader by adding pictures which are not relevant to the section in question. Horologium (talk) 23:02, 24 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:PBIA1966.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:PBIA1966.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 04:50, 18 November 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Your invited!

Wikipedia:Meetup/Miami 3 is coming up in the near future, you are invited to participate. Thanks Secret ^account 17:37, 10 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

December 2009

Please do not add content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did to St. Petersburg Times. Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Cirt (talk) 19:49, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add unsourced or original content, as you did to The Evening Independent. Doing so violates Wikipedia's verifiability policy. If you continue to do so, you will be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Cirt (talk) 19:51, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Next time please take care to have the sources before adding unsourced info to the article, that way, per WP:BURDEN, you can have the sources added at the same time as adding new info. Thanks, Cirt (talk) 20:06, 17 December 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WCIX and Fox

WCIX was the Fox affiliate for the Miami-Ft. Lauderdale market. Even if they didn't brand themselves in such a manner (like "Fox 6" or something of that nature) that doesn't make them any less of an affiliate.

And, Miami and West Palm Beach are two separate television markets. WCIX had its translators on in the fringe areas of Broward County (as noted in the article), and cable coverage should have made up for any over-the-air shortfall. Rather, it can be noted that WFLX was available in areas where WCIX's OTA channel 6 signal could not reach -- but don't call it the default Fox station. Unless this can be officially sourced, please don't rewrite it in that manner again. Station Agent 836 (talk) 05:11, 9 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

South Florida Wikipedia editors Meetup

I proposed a new meeting day, time and place here [3] under the section "New Suggestion" NancyHeise ^talk 07:27, 11 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Replaceable fair use File:PBDailyNews.png

Thanks for uploading File:PBDailyNews.png. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under a claim of fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first non-free content criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:

Go to the media description page and edit it to add {{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}, without deleting the original replaceable fair use template.
On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.

Alternatively, you can also choose to replace this non-free media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.

If you have uploaded other non-free media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our non-free content criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, non-free media which could be replaced by freely licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if uploaded before 13 July 2006), per our non-free content policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Melesse (talk) 17:53, 3 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WFOR2010.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WFOR2010.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore will not be able to answer your questions.

I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used once again.

If you received this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.

To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to somewhere on your talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 18:33, 14 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:BocaMall.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:BocaMall.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:43, 28 July 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wpbflogonew.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wpbflogonew.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

PLEASE NOTE:

I am a bot, and will therefore not be able to answer your questions.
I will remove the request for deletion if the file is used in an article once again.
If you receive this notice after the image is deleted, and you want to restore the image, click here to file an un-delete request.
To opt out of these bot messages, add {{bots|deny=DASHBot}} to your talk page.
If you believe the bot has made an error, please turn it off here and leave a message on my owner's talk page.

Thank you. DASHBot (talk) 05:41, 3 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Specslogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Specslogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of "file" pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "File" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk 03:45, 26 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Gbrunk.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Gbrunk.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Ronhjones ^(Talk) 02:09, 26 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Burdines.jpg listed for deletion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Burdines.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Skier Dude (talk) 02:42, 22 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Westfield Broward, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Westland Mall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:01, 11 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Target Richway

http://www2.palmbeachpost.com/archives/google_archive/search.php?searchTerms=richway&submit.x=14&submit.y=18

Otis KMart 22:58, 1 February 2013 (UTC)Otisfrog — Preceding unsigned comment added by Otisfrog (talk • contribs)

Target Richway

http://www2.palmbeachpost.com/archives/google_archive/search.php?searchTerms=richway&submit.x=14&submit.y=18 look before Target on Palm Beach Lakes Blvd

Otisfrog ^{{talk • contribs}} 02:21, 29 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Hurricane Isaac

Hell Grahambrunk, I was looking through some articles such as the Palm Beach Mall (reading it because of the recent demolition) and noticed that you live in the West Palm Beach area of Florida, just like I do :) . Anyway, I am a member of WikiProject Tropical cyclones and created an article called Effects of Hurricane Isaac (2012) in Florida, which is a separate article specifically about impact from Hurricane Isaac in that sate. I was wondering if you had images from that storm (like standing water/flooding) and would consider uploading them to that page. Regrettably I didn't take too many pictures myself, and I asked WPTV and the Palm Beach Post for various images from their collection like a week ago, but I haven't gotten a response. Thanks if you can offer me help regarding this matter, --12george1 (talk) 02:19, 25 March 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Game Sauce

The article Game Sauce has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

non-notable - Standard searches do not reveal enough significant coverage in independent, reliable sources

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. -- 1Wiki8........................... (talk) 11:40, 21 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:08, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:33, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Wcktlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Wcktlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Oiyarbepsy (talk) 05:32, 9 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Grahambrunk. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Horace Elgin Dodge, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Palm Beach. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:36, 10 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Grahambrunk. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:PBMALL Logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:PBMALL Logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:44, 5 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Grahambrunk. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:05, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disputed non-free use rationale for File:Currant Art Magazine June-July, 1975.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Currant Art Magazine June-July, 1975.jpg. However, there is a concern that the rationale provided for using this file on Wikipedia may not meet the criteria required by Wikipedia:Non-free content. This can be corrected by going to the file description page and adding or clarifying the reason why the file qualifies under this policy. Adding and completing one of the templates available from Wikipedia:Non-free use rationale guideline is an easy way to ensure that your file is in compliance with Wikipedia policy. Please be aware that a non-free use rationale is not the same as an image copyright tag; descriptions for files used under the non-free content policy require both a copyright tag and a non-free use rationale.

If it is determined that the file does not qualify under the non-free content policy, it might be deleted by an administrator seven days after the file was tagged in accordance with section F7 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If you have any questions, please ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thank you.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:00, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sunglass Hut Boynton Beach Mall.jpg

The file File:Sunglass Hut Boynton Beach Mall.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 8 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:18, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with File:63 bluxome poster from early 70s.png

Image Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:63 bluxome poster from early 70s.png.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the description page states who made this derivative work, it currently doesn't specify who created the original work, so the overall copyright status is unclear. If you did not create the original work depicted in this image, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described in section F4 of the criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 17:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC). If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:46, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Bbmall2012.jpg

The file File:Bbmall2012.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, low quality. (very dark)

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:47, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Chickfilapbmall.png

The file File:Chickfilapbmall.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused image, low quality.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --TheImaCow (talk) 17:54, 24 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:WPTVlogoold.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:WPTVlogoold.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 15 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Secret, Strange & True

The article Secret, Strange & True has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-notable show

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 04:10, 24 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Secret, Strange & True for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Secret, Strange & True is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Secret, Strange & True until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

–LaundryPizza03 (d c̄) 07:24, 4 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:TVXlogo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:TVXlogo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:41, 17 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Libcity1.jpg

The file File:Libcity1.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Libcity2.jpg

The file File:Libcity2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Unused, low res, no obvious use.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. --Minorax^«¦talk¦» 04:29, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]