User talk:Gradiva

Welcome!

Hello, Gradiva, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

Image tagging for Image:Life of Moses - Botticelli - Sistine Chapel.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Life of Moses - Botticelli - Sistine Chapel.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the source and creator of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. If you don't indicate the source and creator of the image on the image's description page, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided source information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 13:07, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for Image:Arnold Schoenberg 'The Red Look' - Kandinsky 1910.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Arnold Schoenberg 'The Red Look' - Kandinsky 1910.jpg. Wikipedia gets thousands of images uploaded every day, and in order to verify that the images can be legally used on Wikipedia, the source and copyright status must be indicated. Images need to have an image tag applied to the image description page indicating the copyright status of the image. This uniform and easy-to-understand method of indicating the license status allows potential re-users of the images to know what they are allowed to do with the images.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by OrphanBot. If you need help on selecting a tag to use, or in adding the tag to the image description, feel free to post a message at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. 18:05, 25 October 2006 (UTC)

Van Eyck's Annunciation

Ciao! I've just tried to bring Annunciation (van Eyck) to what would be the standard of language and encyclopedicity here. Maybe giving a glance to my edits would give you an idea about how to work in the future. Bye and good work. --Attilios 07:20, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Manual of style

Have you ever given a glance to this guideline page: WP:Manual of Style? Or Wikipedia:POV? Once you'll be able to respect Wikipedia guidelines, we'll be able to talk again. I have nothing against religion, and the picture is admirable. Thus it needs to have a decent Wikipedia article. Bye and let me know. --Attilios 08:21, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

I can't truly see from which pulpit you dare to accuse me that way, when your articles are so messy and outside any rule of Wikipedia. You are not even able to sign your messages here, and continue to speak? Look at the version now. I deleted the images simply 'cause they appared of the same size of the main image, so I wondered what was their need. Now they've found a place in a specified gallery. I think now it's reasonable, I hope. --Attilios 09:05, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Dear "anonymous" editor, I don't know who you are. Whatever you can think, Wikipedia has rules that one must strive to respect. This is a project with a finilaity set, not a blog you can edit at your pleasure. Of course, any addition like yours is welcome, but you must be also ready to accept when others like me try to edit them in order to put them the way she would be to be a respectable Wikipedia article. You are still missing to read any guideline page!! Of course, you'll surely won't know that, when a case like our will ensue, I will call for editors to set the matter until what is called consensus is reached about a prticular version. And, I've no doubt that my version will be the chosen one, as it complains to the rule we everybody (apart you) try to follow. Bye (frankly, I hope you'll soon learn how to deal with Wikipedia). --Attilios 11:24, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Annunciation

Hi Gradiva! Attilios has asked me to mediate about this editting matter. I hope I can be a little more gentle than he is.

I just checked out the history of the article. I noticed that when you started putting it together, you commenced with a paragrph that begins with the details of the windows and the niello floor, highlighting van Eyck's detailed treatment, and discussing how he applied these details to door hinges and discarded chopines (Most people will not have a clue what chopines are, of course.)

The style of paragraph and the fact that it refers to a number of features not in this picture, suggests that has come from another article. If this is the case, then you must put it in inverted commas and cite your source.

There is a limit to how long a quotation ought to be. If you quote something and it makes up the bulk of your article, then it's not fair dealing. You can quote to support your case, but not to create your substance.

If it is your own observation, then you cannot use expressions like "we can see".

If you use an expression like "one of the greatest" you must support it, eg, "Gombrich cites Jan van Eyck as one of the greatest painters in the history of western art."

On a lesser point, I don't think that there is any significance in the fact that the clerestorey window are round-topped. I doubt very much whether van Eyck was making any conscious distinction in style. If it were the case, then it is highly unlikely that he would move from a Gothic arcade to a Romanesque clerestorey, because it defies the process of building. There are a number of Romanesque buildings in France, Belgium and Sicily that have pointed arcades, Autun Cathedral in France being a very good example. The use of pointed arcades on columns combined with round-headed windows continued, particularly in Italy where they just used whatever shape was convenient, without the perception that round is one style and pointed is a different style. To perceive them as essentially different is a very English way of looking at it. I would delete this part. Keep the part about the pic of God and the Trinity of windows.

Can you cite your references for the article and put anything in quotation marks that ought to be in quotation marks? If you want to praise some artist or some painting to the skies, then you need to find someone that says whatever it is that you want to say. You take about four lines and you quote it properly with acknowledgement.

--Amandajm 13:47, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

A little suggestion

Hello Gradiva, I've read your first version of the article about the wonderful Jan van Eyck's Annunciation. Let me say that you spiritually allegorical exposition, although eligible for a lot of art journals, was nevertheless misleading in an unbiased Encyclopedia such Wikipedia. When you write for wikipedia you're potentially read from a various group of people, and only a part of them reckon like you. However the aim of this copyleft encyclopedia is to communicate to all of them and not to hurt anyone's feelings. As there are different levels of linguistic register, according to the communicative purpose, social context, and social status of the user, we must use a median tone. Hoping that you'll understand that my comment is only an attempt to elucidate the wiki's policy on editing, I finally give you my best wishes for a long and quiet stay within this community.--Grifomaniacs 21:13, 25 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Your edit to Laura (person)

Message posted on Monday, May 28, 2007

Please do not post copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder, as you did to Laura (person). For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites (http://petrarch.petersadlon.com/laura.html in this case) or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously, and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If you believe that the article is not a copyright violation, or if you have permission from the copyright holder to release the content freely under the GNU Free Documentation License (GFDL) then you should do one of the following:

If you have permission from the author leave a message explaining the details on the article Talk page and send an email with the message to "permissions-en (at) wikimedia (dot) org". See Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission for instructions.
If a note on the original website states that re-use is permitted under the GFDL or released into the public domain leave a note at Talk:Laura (person) with a link to where we can find that note;
If you own the copyright to the material: send an e-mail from an address associated with the original publication to permissions-en(at)wikimedia(dot)org or a postal message to the Wikimedia Foundation permitting re-use under the GFDL, and note that you have done so on the article Talk page. Alternatively, you may create a note on your web page releasing the work under the GFDL and then leave a note at Talk:Laura (person) with a link to the details.

Otherwise, you are encouraged to rewrite this article in your own words to avoid any copyright infringement. After you do so, you should place a {{hangon}} tag on the article page and leave a note at Talk:Laura (person) saying you have done so. An administrator will review the new content before taking action.

It is also important that all Wikipedia articles have an encyclopedic tone and follow Wikipedia article layout. For more information on Wikipedia's policies, see Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

Deranged bulbasaur 10:07, 28 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Commercial use of Image:Seven Deadly Sins - Otto Dix.jpg

Hello, this is a message from an automated bot. A tag has been placed on Image:Seven Deadly Sins - Otto Dix.jpg, by another Wikipedia user, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. The tag claims that it should be speedily deleted because Image:Seven Deadly Sins - Otto Dix.jpg is an image licensed as "for non-commercial use only" or "used with permission for use on Wikipedia only" which was either uploaded on or after 2005-05-19 or is not used in any articles (CSD I3).

If you created this media file and want to use it on Wikipedia, you may re-upload it (or amend the image description if it has not yet been deleted) and use the license {{GFDL-self}} to license it under the GFDL, or {{cc-by-sa-2.5}} to license it under the Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike license, or use {{PD-self}} to release it into the public domain.

If you did not create this media file but want to use it on Wikipedia, there are two ways to proceed. First, you may choose one of the fair use tags from this list if you believe one of those fair use rationales applies to this file. Second, you may want to contact the copyright holder and request that they make the media available under a free license.

If the article has already been deleted, see the advice and instructions at WP:WMD. This bot is only informing you of the nomination for speedy deletion, it did not nominate Image:Seven Deadly Sins - Otto Dix.jpg itself. Feel free to leave a message on the bot operator's talk page if you have any questions about this or any problems with this bot. If you have any questions about what to do next or why your image was nominated for speedy deletion please ask at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thanks. --Android Mouse Bot 2 09:31, 29 May 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Image:Amazon preparing for the battle (Queen Antiope or Armed Venus) - Pierre-Eugene-Emile Hebert 1860 - NG of Arts Wash DC.jpg

That template ({{PD-art}}) can only be applied to flat art, if you want to release that picture as PD yourself, use {{PD-self}}. 68.39.174.238 15:25, 11 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Image:CHILPERIC 1er ET FREDEGONDE.jpg

A tag has been placed on Image:CHILPERIC 1er ET FREDEGONDE.jpg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section I8 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is available as a bit-for-bit identical copy on the Wikimedia Commons under the same name, or all references to the image on Wikipedia have been updated to point to the title used at Commons.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag), coupled with adding a note on [[ Talk:Image:CHILPERIC 1er ET FREDEGONDE.jpg|the talk page]] explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the article meets the criterion it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the article that would would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Lastly, please note that if the article does get deleted, you can contact one of these admins to request that a copy be emailed to you. Sdrtirs (talk) 00:55, 12 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Alba_Madonna_-_detail_-_Rafael_1510_-_NG_Wash_DC.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Alba_Madonna_-_detail_-_Rafael_1510_-_NG_Wash_DC.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 13:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 13:15, 14 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image source problem with Image:Amazon_preparing_for_the_battle_(Queen_Antiope_or_Armed_Venus)_-_Pierre-Eugene-Emile_Hebert_1860_-_NG_of_Arts_Wash_DC.jpg

Image Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading Image:Amazon_preparing_for_the_battle_(Queen_Antiope_or_Armed_Venus)_-_Pierre-Eugene-Emile_Hebert_1860_-_NG_of_Arts_Wash_DC.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, then a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a restatement of that website's terms of use of its content, is usually sufficient information. However, if the copyright holder is different from the website's publisher, their copyright should also be acknowledged.

As well as adding the source, please add a proper copyright licensing tag if the file doesn't have one already. If you created/took the picture, audio, or video then the {{GFDL-self}} tag can be used to release it under the GFDL. If you believe the media meets the criteria at Wikipedia:Non-free content, use a tag such as {{non-free fair use in|article name}} or one of the other tags listed at Wikipedia:Image copyright tags#Fair use. See Wikipedia:Image copyright tags for the full list of copyright tags that you can use.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their source and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. If the image is copyrighted under a non-free license (per Wikipedia:Fair use) then the image will be deleted 48 hours after 19:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC). If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. O sama K 19:30, 16 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Image without license

Unspecified source/license for Image:Southern Pillar - Stoivadeion - Temple of Dionysus - Delos Greece Oct 2008.jpg

Thanks for uploading Image:Southern Pillar - Stoivadeion - Temple of Dionysus - Delos Greece Oct 2008.jpg. The image has been identified as not specifying the copyright status of the image, which is required by Wikipedia's policy on images. Even if you created the image yourself, you still need to release it so Wikipedia can use it. If you don't indicate the copyright status of the image on the image's description page, using an appropriate copyright tag, it may be deleted some time in the next seven days. If you made this image yourself, you can use copyright tags like {{PD-self}} (to release all rights), {{self|CC-by-sa-3.0|GFDL}} (to require that you be credited), or any tag here - just go to the image, click edit, and add one of those. If you have uploaded other images, please verify that you have provided copyright information for them as well.

For more information on using images, see the following pages:

This is an automated notice by MifterBot. For assistance on the image use policy, see Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. --MifterBot ^{(Talk • Contribs • Owner)} 03:30, 6 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:La Nourriture de Bacchus - Poussin, c. 1630-35 - Louvre.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:La Nourriture de Bacchus - Poussin, c. 1630-35 - Louvre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. [midnight comet] [talk] 17:35, 2 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Virgin_appearing_to_St-James_-_Poussin_-_1629_-_Louvre.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Virgin_appearing_to_St-James_-_Poussin_-_1629_-_Louvre.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Chris G Bot (talk) 00:11, 11 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Palazzo Farnese

You are overlinking heavily; please see WP:LINK. Just once in the text and once in a caption is enough. Johnbod (talk) 04:44, 15 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Hyacinth Borne to the Heavens by Apollo with satyrs - Annibale Carracci - 1597 - Farnese Gallery, Rome.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thank you for uploading File:Hyacinth Borne to the Heavens by Apollo with satyrs - Annibale Carracci - 1597 - Farnese Gallery, Rome.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the file. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other files, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have uploaded by following this link.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Skier Dude (talk) 08:34, 22 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Tarquinius and Lucretia - Tiepolo - 1750 - Staatsgalerie am Shaezler-Palais, Staedtische Kunstsammlungen Augsburg .jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Tarquinius and Lucretia - Tiepolo - 1750 - Staatsgalerie am Shaezler-Palais, Staedtische Kunstsammlungen Augsburg .jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the website from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of that website's terms of use of its content. However, if the copyright holder is a party unaffiliated from the website's publisher, that copyright should also be acknowledged.

If you have uploaded other files, consider verifying that you have specified sources for those files as well. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log. Unsourced and untagged images may be deleted one week after they have been tagged per Wikipedia's criteria for speedy deletion, F4. If the image is copyrighted and non-free, the image will be deleted 48 hours after 11:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC) per speedy deletion criterion F7. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 11:18, 9 September 2010 (UTC)[reply]

File:Life of Moses - Botticelli - Sistine Chapel.jpg missing description details

Dear uploader: The media file you uploaded as File:Life of Moses - Botticelli - Sistine Chapel.jpg is missing a description and/or other details on its image description page. If possible, please add this information. This will help other editors to make better use of the image, and it will be more informative for readers.

If the information is not provided, the image may eventually be proposed for deletion, a situation which is not desirable, and which can easily be avoided.

If you have any questions please see Help:Image page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 14:33, 14 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Monument to the Soviet-Arab friendship in Aswan (Lotus Flower)

Dear Gradiva

We seem to have opposing opinions while changing the article for the Aswan Dam and the Monument of the Soviet-Arab Friendship (Lotus Flower).

The monument was commissioned by Gidroproekt which performed all the work on behalf of the Ministry of the High Dam of the Arab Republic of Egypt. Architects for the monument were Petr Pavlov and Juri Omelchenko. The sculptor who designed and performed all the bas-relief works inside the monument was Nikolay Vechkanov.

Ernt Neizvestny has neither performed the designs nor any work for the monument. He has, however, offered a few sketches for the inside decoration at the time of the tender, but these sketches have never been used.

Please don't change the articles relating to the monument.

Regards Dmitry — Preceding unsigned comment added by DmitryNV (talk • contribs) 14:37, 12 August 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:Lucretia - Rembrandt 1664 - Wash DC.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Lucretia - Rembrandt 1664 - Wash DC.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Stefan2 (talk) 23:24, 11 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree File:David - Gianlorenzo Bernini 1623 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:David - Gianlorenzo Bernini 1623 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree files because its copyright status is unclear or disputed. If the file's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. You may find more information on the file description page. You are welcome to add comments to its entry at the discussion if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. January (talk) 19:06, 6 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:Galleria Farnese - Annibale Carracci - Palazzo Farnese, Rome.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Galleria Farnese - Annibale Carracci - Palazzo Farnese, Rome.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Diannaa (talk) 22:13, 7 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source problem with File:Arnold Schoenberg 'The Red Look' - Kandinsky 1910.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Arnold Schoenberg 'The Red Look' - Kandinsky 1910.jpg. I noticed that the file's description page currently doesn't specify who created the content, so the copyright status is unclear. If you did not create this file yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. Please add this information by editing the image description page.

If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please refer to the image use policy to learn what images you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. Please also check any other files you have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions or are in need of assistance please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 00:27, 10 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:21, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File:Tarquinius and Lucretia - Rubens - 1610 - Hermitage.jpg listed for discussion

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Tarquinius and Lucretia - Rubens - 1610 - Hermitage.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. LukeSurl^{t c} 09:59, 27 April 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Semicircular portico - by Vignola - Villa Giulia.JPG

The file File:Semicircular portico - by Vignola - Villa Giulia.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

orphaned image, no encyclopedic use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 16 April 2020 (UTC)[reply]

File copyright problem with File:The Rape of Proserpina 1 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:The Rape of Proserpina 1 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg. However, it is currently missing information on its copyright and licensing status. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can verify that it has an acceptable license status and a verifiable source. Please add this information by editing the image description page. You may refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. Thanks again for your cooperation. Magog the Ogre (t • c) 23:49, 8 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Rape of Proserpina 2 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg

The file File:The Rape of Proserpina 2 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a free license template to this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 13:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Rape of Proserpina - Cerberus 2 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg

The file File:The Rape of Proserpina - Cerberus 2 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a free license template to this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 13:51, 26 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:The Rape of Proserpina - Cerberus 1 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg

The file File:The Rape of Proserpina - Cerberus 1 - Bernini - 1622 - Galleria Borghese, Rome.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a free license template to this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 16:55, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Amazzone ferita - Wounded Amazon - Phidias - Musei Capitolini Roma.jpg

The file File:Amazzone ferita - Wounded Amazon - Phidias - Musei Capitolini Roma.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a free license template to this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 16:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Amazzone ferita - Wounded Amazon - Polykleitos - V cent. BC - Musei Capitolini Roma .jpg

The file File:Amazzone ferita - Wounded Amazon - Polykleitos - V cent. BC - Musei Capitolini Roma .jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a free license template to this file.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Dylsss^{(talk contribs)} 16:57, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Moses - Michelangelo.jpg

The file File:Moses - Michelangelo.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Invalid PD-art, this is not a 2D work. If the uploader is the author, they should apply a free license template to this file

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. アンタナナ 19:22, 25 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]