User talk:Grade X/batch Number 2

February 2014

On this very talk page you said, to another editor, "You need sources to add that much new info". Well, Gerda Nicolson doesn't have a single acceptable source, so I don't think you should be complaining about another editor trimming your article. You had better spent your time actually improving the article. Thank you. Drmies (talk) 03:22, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I see what you're saying. However, trimming is one thing but WP:BLANKING is something else. Grade X (talk) 07:25, 2 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, but a recent edit of yours to the page Kristi McGarity has an edit summary that appears to be inaccurate or inappropriate. Please use edit summaries that accurately tell other editors what you did, and feel free to use the sandbox for any tests you may want to do. Thank you. Aoidh (talk) 17:43, 3 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

The change of year of birth looked like vandalism. I mean if it wasn't then fair enough, I have no intention of messing the article further. Grade X (talk) 13:47, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Plagiarism ??

Can we get you to read over Wikipedia:Copy-paste thank you for your time -- Moxy (talk) 18:19, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright. Grade X (talk) 18:20, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

And WP:EW while you're reading?— alf laylah wa laylah (talk) 18:26, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Los Angeles. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware, Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made; that is to say, editors are not automatically "entitled" to three reverts.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Transcendence (talk) 18:41, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alright that particular saga won't drag out any further. I self-reverted and now know the decree. Grade X (talk) 18:57, 4 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]