User talk:Goyalaakash

Welcome!

Compliance with Wikipedia's terms of use.

Hello Goyalaakash. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, and that you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to Black hat SEO.

Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.

Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Goyalaakash. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Goyalaakash|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, please do not edit further until you answer this message. ——SerialNumber54129 15:32, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello SerialNumber, I am editing and creating pages of topics of my interests. I am a relatively new to Wikipedia and still learning the guidelines and policies and the way how it works, so there is possible that I might have violated some guidelines. I am open to learn from it and avoid such mistakes in future. Thanks and would appreciate for your guidance.--Goyalaakash (talk) 16:04, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

@Goyalaakash: Serial Number has linked some relevant templates for you to peruse above, but let me ask you directly; Do you have any sort of connection to LimeRoad? --SamHolt6 (talk) 00:53, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

LimeRoad moved to draftspace

Please send through WP:AFC.

Thanks for your guidance, SerialNumber. Submitted through WP:AFC --Goyalaakash (talk) 16:08, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

AfC notification: Draft:LimeRoad has a new comment

I've left a comment on your Articles for Creation submission, which can be viewed at Draft:LimeRoad. Thanks! ProgrammingGeek^talktome 20:19, 2 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: LimeRoad (November 3)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by SamHolt6 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Declining on the basis of the topic likely failing WP:NCORP and more noticeably WP:CORPDEPTH. In addition, the article creator has a clear COI in regards to the subject given their username.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:LimeRoad and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:LimeRoad, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

SamHolt6 (talk) 00:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goyalaakash! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! SamHolt6 (talk) 00:36, 3 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Engineer.AI

Hello, Goyalaakash. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Engineer.AI".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Dolotta (talk) 13:40, 4 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

User:Goyalaakash/LimeRoad

Hello, Goyalaakash. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or draft page you started, User:Goyalaakash/LimeRoad.

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it. — JJMC89 (T·C) 22:12, 5 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:LimeRoad

Hello, Goyalaakash. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "LimeRoad".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. CptViraj (Talk) 18:15, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]