User talk:Gowzena1978khhwe

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gowzena1978khhwe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was trying to be helpful and constructive. I will try and be helpful if unblocked.

Decline reason:

You need to stop proposing articles be split. PhilKnight (talk) 10:02, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gowzena1978khhwe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK. I will stop proposing articles to be split, unless I discuss on the talk page first. I'm wrong, the admin is right.

Decline reason:

It is obvious from your initial edits that you are very familiar with Wikipedia. For an unblock request to have any chance of success, you will need to disclose any previous accounts you've used. Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Gowzena1978khhwe (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

OK, previous accounts: * 195.188.50.200 (talk · contribs), some edits during 2007-2008. * Coxingle (talk · contribs) (joke account in 2006) * 82.42.151.164 (talk · contribs), not all edits from that can be attributed to me. Some edits during 2005. I also know Cornchips (talk · contribs) in real life, they're no longer active here but want to return. For the record, though, they're not WoW. I also know The Bad Tax Man (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log) in real life as well. FWIW, Cornchips wants to return and re-edit productively, 17 years later, but he's forgotten his account password and it never had email.

Decline reason:

Confirmed to Berkwood Guy, Tramway Valpern, ThrowawayUser128291hk. Easy decline is easy. Yamla (talk) 10:48, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

You are not permitted to remove declined unblock requests for your currently active block. Do not do so again. This is your second warning. --Yamla (talk) 11:19, 30 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]