User talk:Gout2012

Your submission at Articles for creation

Refractory chronic gout, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

— The Earwig ^(talk) 20:26, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits

Hello. In case you didn't know, when you add content to talk pages and Wikipedia pages that have open discussion, you should sign your posts by typing four tildes ( ~~~~ ) at the end of your comment. You could also click on the signature button or located above the edit window. This will automatically insert a signature with your username or IP address and the time you posted the comment. This information is useful because other editors will be able to tell who said what, and when they said it. Thank you. --SineBot (talk) 21:07, 21 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gout

Reverted your edits as 1) we do not format like this 2) this content is already covered. Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 23:38, 25 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment on Refractory chronic gout. Blue Rasberry (talk) 15:11, 26 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You must comment on the talk page as Blue has mentioned above [1] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (please reply on my talk page) 16:22, 10 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Formatting

Hello. There's no need to place references at the top of the page, just behind the text it verifies.[2] Also, if you use the same reference more than once, you can do this. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 17:27, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

And we only place things in the lead as a summary of what is verified in the rest of the article. Best. Biosthmors (talk) 17:31, 29 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A discussion regarding your editing is occurring here

[3] Doc James (talk · contribs · email) (if I write on your talk page please reply on mine) 16:03, 17 July 2012 (UTC)[reply]