User talk:Gotyear

Welcome!

Hello, Gotyear, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! -- Jeff3000 01:02, 5 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Kirsten Akkerman afd

Hi Gotyear. Welcome to Wikiedia! I came across the above deletion debate and hope you don't mind a little constructive criticism. Afd is fairly resource intensive and debates on uncontroversial articles that patently meet WP:CSD should be avoided. A more standard route for the circumstances was to revert the removal of the speedy deletion tag (by clicking on the date stamp in the article's history prior to the removal clicking edit and saving with an appropriate edit summary). You could then tag the remover's talk page with {{drmspeedy-n}} (all templates can be found at Wikipedia:Template messages). If the speedy tag continued to get reverted, you would escalate the warnings—{{drmspeedy2-n}}, {{drmspeedy3-n}} and {{drmspeedy4-n}}. If the article wasn't deleted by that time, and a revert happened after the final warning, you can report the editor at WP:AIAV. Note that reversion of simple vandalism does not violate WP:3RR.--Fuhghettaboutit 22:41, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Leave it be:-: It'll be closed soon I imagine. The fact that you even made an afd so new is impressive! By the way, my talk page is an open door, so feel free to stop by for any reason.--Fuhghettaboutit 23:05, 13 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

19 October 2006

Thanks for your help this AM with some persistent vandals. Dan D. Ric 15:03, 19 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Thanks for the Khan heads up at AIV

It was a good job of you to identify it as a valid username first! Cheers! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 20:51, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

RE: Questioning an IP's edits

I think that the user is certainly acting a bit questionable, but as far as labelling the edits "vandalism", I'm not quite sure. Wikipedia defines vandalism as an overt attempt to disrupt Wikipedia. Blanking valid content without an explanation should be reverted and the user should be notified not to blank content without explaining why. Removing requests from RPP should only be done by administrators, as far as I know, and the removals seem to be a bit unwarranted. In giving users warnings, use your best judgement, and it doesn't hurt to personalise the warning, rather than using a standard "test" warning. Thanks for the message, and I hope my response helps! Feel free to drop me a line any time with other questions or comments. Cheers hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 21:32, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

I just noticed that the IP belongs to AOL and the curious behaviour is probably due to a number of users editing with that IP. hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 21:35, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Sure thing! The standard tempates are usually quite appropriate to use, but like I said, just use your judgement and ask yourself "If I made a mistake, how would I want the person spotting the mistake to approach me?" Have fun! hoopydink^{Conas tá tú?} 21:43, 22 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Battle of Trenton

how did you revert that so quickly? is there a magic 'revert' button I'm missing? --User24 16:11, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Less vs. fewer

Thanks for the comments on my talk page! If Sarah Jane Smith didn't spell it out - my version of the rule is: when you can count 'em, use fewer. When you can't, use less. Valtam 21:15, 23 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Well...

I stopped because I wasn't sure if that's what we should be doing. I can blanket rollback these edits, but I don't have the expertise with images to really assess the tags he's put on. Sorry! -- Merope 02:09, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Tagging empty image description pages for speedy deletion

What specifically do you think is wrong with it? The images themselves (and the descriptions) will still exist in commons if the empty description page gets deleted from wikipedia. See your own example, Image:CloudOpticalThickness.jpg, and click edit, there's nothing there. Those empty pages are supposed to be deleted with the exact template you quoted: "This is an image page for a missing or corrupt image or an empty image description page for a Commons-hosted image". Is there something I'm missing here? This is the second time in a short while when someone has a problem with deleting empty pages that do nothing. - Bobet 19:17, 24 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, don't worry about it, I'll probably fix (ie. delete) them eventually. And there's really no fault in what you did, you just happened to get unlucky by having people who weren't familiar with the subject answering at WP:ANI. As an example, I deleted the image page I linked above. As you can see, it's still a bluelink, but if you click on it, you'll see that it doesn't exist on wikipedia anymore (the "image" tab at the upper left corner is red). This is how it should be for the commons images. - Bobet 06:36, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Re: Stopped after last, monitoring

The user hadn't vandalized for 20 minutes, and my block log showed nothing (odd...). Anyway, if an IP vandal stops, we'll often wait until they start again, as blocks are supposed to be preventative, not punitive. Thanks for writing. :) RadioKirk (u|t|c) 18:00, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

IP

User:152.163.100.134 they are not blocked at the moment. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:02, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

dont worry the block/unblocking can be a mess and there are the vandal factor. Betacommand ^{(talk • contribs • Bot)} 18:14, 25 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Pierre-Gilles de Gennes

Thank you for your work on this page. The Uninvited Co., Inc. 03:29, 26 October 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Autism

Re; Holisticlife promo text-Ta for that. I was away from the computer for a moment and bang, Holisticlife is turning it into an advert.

I have been in education for some time and have a clinical doctorate--I have an interest in this area and after seeing what happened when the article fell from grace as it were, decided to see if I could bring it up to snuff. I have written published works and am still reasonably aware of the strictures of format but do let me know if you see a glitch in my cntributions. There is a lot to keep track of. Malangthon 03:18, 22 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gotyear,

FYI, an edit to the introduction section of [[Autism}} has been made which, in my opinion, presents problems. It is from one perspective a minor change however, it does seem to wreck havoc with the tone and is in fact an alteration of published fact from the reputable sources cited. I have proposed a change to carry the factual original statement and the alternative--which is absolutely ethical in science to be sure. I readily concede that the DSM and the ICD do represent a theoretical perspective which must be questioned to remain scientific.

If you have time and you are interested, take a look and give us some objective feedback. Ta. Malangthon 02:30, 24 January 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Transwiki question

There are two links for this at wiktionary, the first is the one we sent to them, at wikt:Transwiki:By the numbers. The second link, wikt:by the numbers, is a dictionary definition which wiktionary already had in place before we sent them our version of it. Eventually, the editors at wiktionary will integrate the two articles (if they think ours is good or worth keeping). --Xyzzyplugh 21:33, 27 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

...for help on the Polecat image — BQZip01 — ^talk 16:04, 28 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for pointing out my edits are automatically marked 'Minor Edit'..

I didn't realise that all my edits were being without my intervention as 'Minor Edit[s]' and I have changed the options accordingly as you stated. I just wanted to pass on my profound thanks. PoliceChief (talk) 15:40, 26 July 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Userification of The Scapecast

I've just closed this AfD, and per your request I've userified the article. It can now be found at User:Gotyear/The Scapecast. Hope this helps, feel free to shout if you need anything more Gazi moff 18:57, 6 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you! Gotyear (talk) 20:09, 13 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Current events

I semi-protected those pages, hopefully that will do the trick. Cirt (talk) 04:32, 17 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

ITN

On 21 November, 2008, In the news was updated with a news item that involved the article Waitaha penguin, which you helped update. If you know of another interesting news item involving a recently created or updated article, then please suggest it on the In the news candidates page.

--Spencer^T♦^C 11:49, 21 November 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

I'm trying to deal with BF101 over at Simple literally as I type; he's running roughshod all over that site. Thanks for alerting me to that other sleeper IP. Just clobbered it as well. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 20:20, 25 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Old Bambifan101 business

I think that range was among the ones blocked for a year, but I just blocked the individual account for a year just to be safe and I reblocked the "OddParents" account with denial of talk page access given his history of abuse. I think he may have slipped in through the cracks the other day with an obvious sock, but I clobbered it before he could do any damage. Might have been one he did at a public terminal. Thanks for alerting me! It's been a joy these last couple of weeks. I really think that BellSouth shut him down as they indicated they might. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 04:14, 2 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

Got Bambifan yet again; thanks for alerting me. He's smarter than he leads everyone to believe. I say that because he clearly created some sleeper accounts like this one knowing full well he risked having his internet service shut off. When it was, he simply found another computer, logged on to the sleeper and voila. This kid is in need of therapy. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 17:37, 6 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:29, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:52, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:19, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:22, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:SpacePatrol-comic.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:SpacePatrol-comic.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:06, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

List of articles about wikis listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect List of articles about wikis. Since you had some involvement with the List of articles about wikis redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. - CHAMPION ^{(talk) (contributions) (logs)} 04:58, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]