User talk:Gotthard175
Hello Gotthard175, thank you for declaring your status as a paid editor. Since you have a paid conflict of interest, you should not edit the article directly; I will place some information below about how you can request edits to the article. Regards, --bonadea contributions talk 11:42, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Gotthard175. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam#External link spamming);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.
Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 11:43, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
June 2022
[edit]
Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been or will be reverted.
- If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively, you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant noticeboards.
- If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.
Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive. Continued disruptive editing may result in loss of editing privileges. As already advised, you should not make edits to the article yourself. Using the process outlined above, you should suggest edits on the article talk page. Thank you. bonadea contributions talk 16:50, 4 June 2022 (UTC)
- @Bonadea: The goal of this edit is not to promote the company TESTEX or its services commercially, but to provide in depth information about the history of the company which has existed for 175 years. In 2021 a book was written by a historian, covering the 175 year history of the company in detail, including photos. The idea is to provide the public with a compact version of this history on the company’s Wikipedia page. I would appreciate if you could explain to me how this is “unconstructive” or “disruptive”. I have strictly adhered to all WP:CCPOLs and please note that there is also no Wikipedia policy that explicitly requires me to make any suggestions on the talk page. Gotthard175 (talk) 08:22, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- The way to make an edit request is outlined above. Please follow that process. Thank you. --bonadea contributions talk 08:38, 9 June 2022 (UTC)
- I think you may have missed out on Bonadea's "edit summary" from a few weeks ago when he tried to explain things to you, and his edit summary stated "not getting embroiled in this". Now I will disclaim here that I virtually never insert myself into discussions of proposals for new articles or COI situations, and I may not be particularly concerned about avoiding offending newbies or others. That said, my reaction is that *you* are the sort of editor that these procedures are directed at. If there's a suggestion to discuss a change on the talk page, this means Y-O-U!
- One point to make, you explained that you just wanted to give a digest version of some company history. But did you ask yourself: Does the Wikipedia audience want to read that? Sure, it's possible that somewhere out there is somebody who does ... and yet, that can't be the criteria... if that were the case, we may as well just toss out the "topic notability" criteria. I suggest that, rather than summarizing that history, you just include a link to the history in the "further reading" section.
- Anyway, not to put too fine a point on this, the reason to be concerned about COI editors (or, at least, one reason to be concerned about COI editors) is a lack of perspective.... to wit (paraphrasing your text above about "the goal of this edit"): "there might be somebody who would really like a summary of this sort, so I should include it". Sigh.
- I may be speaking in a tone that others try to avoid ... Hopefully I have not gone beyond the bounds of permissible harshness, though I can't say I'm overly concerned if I have. Fabrickator (talk) 09:54, 7 July 2022 (UTC)
Your thread has been archived
[edit]
|
Hi Gotthard175! The thread you created at the Wikipedia:Teahouse, You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please .
|