User talk:Gorkemcetin74

Your article has been moved to AfC space

Hi! I would like to inform you that the Articles for Creation submission which was previously located here: User:Gorkemcetin74/Gideros Studio has been moved to Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gideros Studio, this move was made automatically and doesn't affect your article, if you have any questions please ask on my talk page! Have a nice day. ArticlesForCreationBot (talk) 11:29, 22 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Gorkemcetin74, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! Sarah (talk) 17:14, 23 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your article for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gideros Studio.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Sarah (talk) 15:38, 26 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gideros Studio.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Kilopi (talk) 08:16, 9 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Gideros studio logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Gideros studio logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 09:58, 21 May 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gideros Studio concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Gideros Studio, a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 02:01, 15 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Countly (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Eclipsed was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Countly and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

-- Eclipsed (talk) (email) 09:05, 27 June 2015 (UTC)[reply]

questions about Countly , plus some sources I found

Hellow Gorkemcetin74, over on the Draft_talk:Countly page I've left you some analysis of the WP:SOURCES. Also, I've left you some questions about the curious story of Draft:Count.ly (with oddly-added period!) over on User_talk:Peridon. If you don't get this message before one or both of those discussions is archived, or if you'd just rather open a new conversation-thread, you can reach me at my own talkpage in my signature, click 'talk' and then click 'new section' at the top, type me a note, and click save. Thanks much, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 00:40, 29 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Many thanks, I received your email. What is your username btw? I only see an IP address. Gorkemcetin74 (talk) 16:36, 11 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Gorkemcetin74 , actually I did not email you. But sometimes people configure their wikipedia settings, to automatically send email when they get a message on their talkpage. I only use my IP address, I don't have a username. See WP:HUMAN. :-) If you have some time, I would be happy to work with you on seeing whether Countly passes WP:42. Just leave me a note here, User_talk:75.108.94.227.

As for the other stuff, perhaps admins User:Peridon and perhaps User:Risker would like to ask for your help, Gorkemcetin, with the strange behavior you noted here.[1] Peridon, see also the archived usertalk-thread when Gorkemcetin74 came to complain about User:Jinlizzy's behavior (which later turned out to be WP:Orangemoody) here, User_talk:Peridon/Archives/2015/September#Countly_-_Speedy_Deletion. Gorkemcetin74, you didn't do anything wrong, and indeed, you helped wikipedia uncover some people that WERE doing things wrong, so don't be alarmed. :-) 75.108.94.227 (talk) 23:52, 9 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Sure, sorry I didnt reply to you earlier about what I can do to make my article pass. I just spent too much time on it, but seeing it doesn't pass really turns me down. I'll definitely have a look at it when I have some spare time. I sincerely thank you for your hard work to let me understand what is wrong with the article, and what can be done to improve it. Really appreciated. Gorkemcetin74 (talk) 12:54, 16 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, wikipedia can be a pain, there are a lot of rules! But do not lose hope yet. :-) If you can please find some sources, with multiple paragraphs about Countly, in Turkish-language newspapers and magazines, I know a wikipedian who has turkish-to-english skills. Please leave me a note on my user-talkpage, when you need some help, and I'll be happy to work with you on cleaning up the Countly article to make it acceptable per the wiki-rules. You can also ask for help at the unofficial #wikipedia-en-help ^connect live-chat, sometimes I'm there but there myself, but if not there *is* usually some experienced wikipedian there to answer questions. Thanks, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 15:59, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

request for help dealing with the people behind User:Jinlizzy

Gorkem, if you have not done so already, can you please email your complaint about the events in September/October related to User:Jinlizzy, to this official email?

info-orangemoodywikipedia.org

The person that approached you, and allegedly asked for money, has already been blocked from editing wikipedia, as you can see at User:Jinlizzy, as part of the Orangemoody cleanup.

However, the information you have may be helpful to the wikipedians in further investigating the problem, and keeping it from happening again!

To be clear, *you* have not done anything wrong, this is just an email address, where a wikipedia WP:OTRS person, can ask some questions to see if the wikipedia admins can help prevent bad things from happening to good people in the future. Make sense?

Let me know if you have any questions or concerns, you can click 'talk' next to my IP address, then click 'new section' and leave me a note. Thanks, 75.108.94.227 (talk) 16:37, 22 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Countly

Hello, Gorkemcetin74. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Countly".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 23:04, 30 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Gorkemcetin74. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest. People with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, see the conflict of interest guideline and frequently asked questions for organizations. In particular, please:

avoid editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, its competitors, or projects and products you or they are involved with;
instead, propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use require disclosure of your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing, and autobiographies. Thank you. Tokyogirl79 (｡◕‿◕｡) 19:49, 1 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Countlylogo.png

The file File:Countlylogo.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 28 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]