User talk:Gooogen

August 2007

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did to User:MastCell. Your edits appear to be vandalism and have been reverted. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 16:57, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

You keep posting messages on people's user pages(which is where they tell a bit about themselves) not their talk pages(which is used a s a place of discussion).Angel Of Sadness ^T/C 17:03, 3 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Mistake

If you look at the edit summary (Reverted 4 edits by 88.19.207.237 identified as vandalism to last revision by Gooogen. (TW)), it was meant toward the IP address 88.19.207.237. I thought that the IP was editing other peoples' discussions. I just realized the IP was also involved in the discussion. So it was a mistake on my part.¤~Persian Poet Gal ^(talk) 18:33, 4 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Please sign your talk page posts

As a courtesy to other editors, it is a Wikipedia guideline to sign your posts on talk pages, user talk pages, and WikiProject pages. To do so, simply add four tildes (~~~~) at the end of your comments. Your user name or IP address (if you are not logged in) and the date will then be automatically added along with a timestamp when you save your comment. Signing your comments helps people to find out who said something and provides them with a link to your user/talk page (for further discussion). For further info, read Wikipedia:Talk page guidelines. Thank you. • Maurog • 15:42, 6 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Signing is very easy. What you do is, every time you add a comment on a talk page, insert four tildes after the comment like that: ~~~~ The tilde is located above the TAB button on a standard keyboard. It's typed as shift-`. Hope it helps. • Maurog • 20:17, 16 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry about my bot. I have removed the warning my bot put on your talk page. Winbots 05:56, 7 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Note left on my userTalk

Hi! I noticed that you left this note on my Talk page: "You have noticed unfreeride back continuisly with differrent IP addresses?"

I have no idea what your message means or what it is in reference to. Please clarify. Drenched 06:45, 9 August 2007 (UTC)[reply]

(Replied on my disscussion page too, but pasted here so you'd get the message notification) Oh, okay I understand now. Thanks for the heads up, this absolutely does concern me. The article that I was editing was primarily Stereotypes of East and Southeast Asians, but a while after he started making 20+ edits a day of OR in abysmal English and undoing my edits and ballooning the article to an unnecessarily epically long mess, I got worn out trying to salvage the page and stopped editing. I just visited the article again recently and it makes me sad. Is it really necessary for the topic of East/Southeast Asian stereotyping to have 4 branch-off articles?? Anyway, I'm not surprised to hear your story about the Human height page...I've had a similar experience with him on the stereotypes page. He tried to assert that Asians had higher IQs than everyone else, tried to devote an entire section to why soybeans make people shorter and more effeminate, and called me a white supremacist when I removed his very off topic contributions. I was unaware that he had gotten banned. How did you go about getting him banned (is there a discussion or history page somewhere about this banning)? Is there a shorter banning process if we can somehow show that he is the same person? Thanks again for contacting me and letting me know. --Drenched 04:59, 11 August 2007 (UTC)

Notifiying about a vote

Hello. The article Stereotypes of whites, which you helped writing, is being nominated for deletion. If you want, you could state your opinion here. Thank you. M.V.E.i. 21:09, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Ouuu sorry, you werent editing it. You i found at Drenched‎'s user page. Why did i enter your page? Ah yeah. I wanted to tell you that my grandfather visited China during the Soviet era, and must i say, he told us that there are many Chinese who are very tall. M.V.E.i. 21:40, 3 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

He didn't menegge them his an engeneer, but he came stood near them and he talked to them (i dont know using a trnslator or did they know Russian). Hhhh o my, chinese are one of the most contributing nations in the world but "the superior race" is not the best language to use. His reasons are said in a kind of weird way. But we do have this thing that an avarage hight in a country or a region is different from place to place. But again, a certain % cant judge about the complete 100%. M.V.E.i. 05:37, 4 September 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Working on recreating “Race and crime”.

I’m posting this comment on the discussion pages of several users who were involved in the article Race and crime before it was merged into Anthropological criminology, to let all of you know that I’m working on recreating the Race and crime article. My current draft for it can be found here. I would appreciate help from any of you with two things related to this:

1: RegentsPark, the admin who protected the redirect from Race and crime to Anthropological criminology, has suggested that the statistical information in this article should be better-integrated into the portion of it that discusses how these statistics can be interpreted. I would appreciate help with improving this aspect of the article, or any other aspects of it that you think could be improved.

2: RegentsPark has let me know here that he won’t be willing to unprotect the article himself, no matter how much it’s improved, so if I would like it to be unprotected I should propose this at WP:RFPP. I’ve proposed there that it be unprotected, but the admin who responded (User:Camaron) stated that without RegentsPark’s approval, I would need to first obtain a consensus that the article should be recreated. If you think the article does not require any additional improvements, and is good enough to be recreated in its current state, I would appreciate you making your opinion about this known on the draft’s discussion page, so that we can begin to create a consensus for this.

Thanks in advance. --Captain Occam (talk) 07:48, 23 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]