User talk:Goonzobye diver

This is Goonzobye diver's talk page, where you can send them messages and comments.

Put new text under old text. Click here to start a new topic.
New to Wikipedia? Welcome! Learn to edit; get help.

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raimondo Bucher (April 18)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by Dan arndt were:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of people). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The content of this submission includes material that does not meet Wikipedia's minimum standard for inline citations. Please cite your sources using footnotes. For instructions on how to do this, please see Referencing for beginners. Thank you.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Lacks any inline citations, referencing reliable secondary sources - see WP:REFB.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raimondo Bucher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raimondo Bucher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Goonzobye diver! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 09:20, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Referencing

Is a reference such as an article in "LIFE" magazine considered a reliable reference?

The relevant article is accessible even from web:

https://books.google.it/books?id=tFIEAAAAMBAJ&pg=PA32&dq=bucher+1952+life+record&hl=it&sa=X&ved=2ahUKEwjCqaGgjZ33AhVa57sIHXPiBj4Q6AF6BAgDEAI#v=onepage&q=bucher%201952%20life%20record&f=false%7C

and it is reported in "References" section.

Same question for the book written by Gilbert Doukan in 1959, an electronic copy of this book is stored in archive.org at

https://archive.org/details/worldbeneaththew009216mbp/page/n117/mode/2up

and it is also reported in "References" section.

Is it considered a reliable source? Goonzobye diver (talk) 11:40, 18 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

The Life magazine article and the book by Doukan are both reliable sources - the issue is the way that these references are cited. All information contained within the draft needs to be referenced with inline citations (see Wikipedia's guide to referencing for beginners). If you need any help with this let me know. Dan arndt (talk) 01:28, 19 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raimondo Bucher (June 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms that promote the subject.

The comment the reviewer left was:

The following changes are needed:

1. Some of this does indeed need inline citations: the list of accomplishments; every one needs a third party reference The biography section needs to be rewritten in idiomatic English--some of the tenses are wrong-- we use the past tense for things in the past; some of the sentence structure is confusing; ssome of the writing is over-personal; The quote from Doukan is excessive detail. .

I apologize if my previous comment misled you; inline quotes are not needed for everything, but they are needede for specific things, such as I listed here.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Raimondo Bucher and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Raimondo Bucher, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page ]].

DGG ( talk ) 01:04, 27 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Bucher rolleiflex.jpg

Thanks for uploading File:Bucher rolleiflex.jpg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 12:30, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Raimondo Bucher has been accepted

Raimondo Bucher, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. Most new articles start out as Stub-Class or Start-Class and then attain higher grades as they develop over time. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

S0091 (talk) 18:07, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Goonzobye diver, I suggest adding a bit a about him to Freediving#History. Its odd he's not mentioned. S0091 (talk) 18:11, 9 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Great suggestion! Thank you, I'll do it! Goonzobye diver (talk) 19:37, 10 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]